Files
shadow-testandClaude Opus 5 ab747ce53d
Build App (Preview) / compute-version (pull_request) Successful in 4s
Build App (Preview) / create-release (pull_request) Successful in 1s
Build App (Preview) / build-macos (pull_request) Successful in 2m40s
Build App (Preview) / build-linux (pull_request) Successful in 5m33s
Build App (Preview) / build-windows (pull_request) Successful in 5m40s
Build App (Preview) / prune-previews (pull_request) Successful in 1s
Say what "open in container" is doing, and land on the pane doing it
Opening a page is a container probe, a browser launch, a page load and
often a viewer start — several seconds during which the only feedback
was the click itself. Worse from a terminal, where the result appears in
a pane the user is not looking at.

So: the backend emits progress on the existing `container-progress`
channel at each step, the Browser tab renders that line whenever it is
set — the progress belongs to the project, not to whoever pressed the
button, which is what lets a terminal-initiated open report anywhere at
all — and the terminal's "In container" now selects the project's
Browser tab before starting, so the line has somewhere to appear.

Selecting a sub-tab from outside needed a route: `ProjectHome` keeps it
in local state, so `openProjectHomeTab` parks a request in the store and
the pane consumes it once. Consumed once, so it cannot fight the user's
own clicking afterwards.

Preview releases now prune themselves to the newest KEEP_PREVIEWS (2),
in a job that runs only if all three platforms published — a
half-finished run must not evict a good older build. The cleanup
workflow's manual sweep stays as the backstop.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-11 11:13:21 -07:00
..