Secret Scan / scan (push) Successful in 4s
Build App (Preview) / compute-version (pull_request) Successful in 3s
Secret Scan / scan (pull_request) Successful in 4s
Build App (Preview) / create-release (pull_request) Successful in 1s
Build App (Preview) / build-linux (pull_request) Failing after 1m49s
Build App (Preview) / build-macos (pull_request) Successful in 2m41s
Build App (Preview) / build-windows (pull_request) Successful in 4m55s
Build App (Preview) / prune-previews (pull_request) Skipped
An adversarial review of the previous commit found six real problems and corrected one of my claims. Taking all of it. **The anchoring could kill the channel it exists to protect.** It did DELETE-then-POST so the tag would name the current build. If the POST failed for any transient reason the script aborted having already deleted the anchor a previous run put there, and the next mirror run pruned GitHub's copy — a transient Gitea error converting a healthy channel into a dead one, which is strictly worse than the step not existing. There was also a real window between the two calls with no tag at all. The DELETE bought nothing. The update string resolves the tag by *name* and the assets hang off the release object, so nothing about the channel depends on which commit the tag points at; moving it changes only the source-zip link. It existed solely to get past a 409, since Gitea's POST /tags has no force semantics. Now the tag is created if absent and otherwise left alone, which removes the window too. **My "no window where the two disagree" claim was wrong, and it is the third time in this area I have asserted something I had not established.** The release POST sets no `target_commitish`, so GitHub creates its tag at its own default-branch HEAD, not at `GITEA_SHA`; the two agree only because `sync_on_commit` pushes main minutes earlier. And the DELETE actively created the window. What the ordering genuinely buys is narrower: if anchoring fails, the script aborts before creating a GitHub release that would be orphaned. **Orphaned drafts were invisible to the release lookup.** GitHub demotes a release to a draft when its tag is deleted, and `/releases/tags/` never returns drafts — precisely the state every mirror run left behind. The by-tag lookup reported "absent" while 86 MB drafts accumulated, one per release. The lookup now reads the authenticated list, republishes the newest, and deletes the rest. **A guard that could not catch what it named.** The update-info assertion was a substring match on the tag, so it passed for a wrong host, path, filename or transport — verified: an `evil.example.com/.../linux-latest/...` string passes the old check and fails the new one. Now a fixed full-string match. Also from the review: an absent bundled library no longer exits early, because that skipped the metadata *and* left `update-channel/` uncreated, killing the publish step on a missing directory and taking the tag and mirror jobs with it; the Categories guard asserts the absence of an empty value rather than the presence of any filled one; the channel directory is cleared before use so a stale zsync cannot satisfy an existence check while describing the previous build; the AppImage count uses a glob array, since `ls | wc -l` aborted under pipefail before the message it promised could print; uploads carry the retry/http1.1 hardening this repo's other upload steps already learned to need; verification compares served size against built size, because a status code only proves something is served; and the release workflow now fails on empty artifacts instead of publishing a release with no AppImage. The metainfo file is installed as `Triple-C.appdata.xml`. appimagetool derives the name it looks for from the .desktop basename, so under the id-based name it warned the metadata was missing on every build while this script reported it present. Now it prints "AppStream upstream metadata found in usr/share/metainfo/Triple-C.appdata.xml" — the AppStream id inside the file is unchanged and is what identifies the component. Two review hypotheses did not hold and nothing was changed for them: `set -e` does not abort on a failing `&&` list mid-script, and my claim of a `trap` reassignment was wrong — there is one trap, installed once. Verified against the real 0.4.19 artifact: exit 0, one AppImage beside the release, channel pair in its own directory, appimagetool reporting the metadata found, and the wayland fallback intact. Guards exercised individually — the duplicate one bites, the exact-match one rejects an impostor carrying the tag, the empty directory reports cleanly, and all four publisher preconditions refuse rather than half-publishing. Header parsing for the size check was tested against a real redirecting GitHub asset URL. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_011YPqHpjV4EL6RNEwrRKqQm