Files
Triple-C/container/mission-control/.claude/skills/init-project/FLIGHT_OPERATIONS.md
Josh Knapp 2dffef0767
All checks were successful
Build App / compute-version (push) Successful in 2s
Build App / build-macos (push) Successful in 2m47s
Build Container / build-container (push) Successful in 9m0s
Build App / build-linux (push) Successful in 4m41s
Build App / build-windows (push) Successful in 5m33s
Build App / create-tag (push) Successful in 3s
Build App / sync-to-github (push) Successful in 10s
Bundle mission-control into Triple-C instead of cloning from GitHub
The mission-control (Flight Control) project is being closed upstream.
This embeds the project files directly in the repo under container/mission-control/,
bakes them into the Docker image at /opt/mission-control, and copies them into place
at container startup instead of git cloning from GitHub.

Also adds missing osc52-clipboard, audio-shim, and triple-c-sso-refresh to the
programmatic Docker build context in image.rs.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-03 09:09:15 -07:00

6.6 KiB

Flight Operations Quick Reference

For full methodology docs, see mission-control

Before You Start

Read these files in order:

  1. .flightops/ARTIFACTS.md — Where and how artifacts are stored (project-specific)
  2. The flight log for your active flight — Ground truth for what happened
  3. The leg artifact you're implementing — Your acceptance criteria

Project Crew & Phases

Each phase of the Flight Control workflow has a crew definition in .flightops/agent-crews/:

Crew Purpose
mission-design.md Crew for /mission (e.g., Architect validates viability)
flight-design.md Crew for /flight (e.g., Architect reviews spec)
leg-execution.md Crew for /agentic-workflow (e.g., Developer + Reviewer)
flight-debrief.md Crew for /flight-debrief (e.g., Developer provides perspective)
mission-debrief.md Crew for /mission-debrief (e.g., Architect provides perspective)

Crew files define: roles, models, interaction protocols, prompts, and signals. Customize these to change your project's agent configuration.


Multi-Agent Workflow

Legs must be implemented by a separate Developer instance and reviewed by a separate Reviewer instance (or whatever crew is defined in leg-execution.md). Mission Control designs legs and orchestrates — it does NOT implement code directly.

The Reviewer has no knowledge of the Developer's reasoning — only the resulting changes. This separation provides objective code review. Use the /agentic-workflow skill in mission-control to drive this cycle.


⚠️ Leg Completion Checklist (MANDATORY)

You MUST complete ALL of these before emitting [COMPLETE:leg]:

Step Action
1 All acceptance criteria verified
2 Tests passing
3 Update flight log — Add leg progress entry (see below)
4 Mark leg completed — Update leg status to completed
5 Update flight — Check off the leg in flight artifact
6 Commit/save with all artifact updates

Flight log entry MUST include:

  • Leg status, started date, completed date
  • Changes Made (what was implemented)
  • Verification (how acceptance criteria were confirmed)
  • Any decisions, deviations, or anomalies

Refer to .flightops/ARTIFACTS.md for exact locations and formats.


Workflow Signals

Emit at the end of your response, on its own line:

Signal When
[HANDOFF:review-needed] Artifact changes ready for validation
[HANDOFF:confirmed] Review complete, no issues
[BLOCKED:reason] Cannot proceed
[COMPLETE:leg] Leg done AND checklist complete

Implementing a Leg

Pre-Implementation

  1. Read mission, flight, and leg artifacts
  2. Read flight log for context from prior legs
  3. Verify leg accuracy against existing code
  4. Update leg status to in-flight
  5. Present summary and get approval before proceeding

Implementation

  1. Implement to acceptance criteria
  2. Run tests with a timeout — use the test runner's timeout flag (e.g., --timeout, --test-timeout, -timeout) so hanging tests fail fast instead of stalling. If a test hangs, kill it, isolate the hanging test, and fix the root cause before continuing. Log hanging tests and their resolution in the flight log.
  3. Run code review, fix Critical/Major issues
  4. Re-review until clean

Post-Implementation

  1. Propagate changes (project docs, flight artifacts if scope changed)
  2. Complete the Leg Completion Checklist above
  3. Signal [COMPLETE:leg]

Just-in-Time Planning

Flights and legs are created one at a time, not upfront.

Reviewing... Should exist Should NOT exist yet
Mission Mission artifact Flight artifacts (only listed)
Flight Flight artifact Leg artifacts (only listed)
Leg Leg artifact Ready to implement

Listed flights/legs are tentative suggestions that evolve based on discoveries.


Reviewing Artifacts

When reviewing a mission, flight, or leg:

  1. Read the artifact thoroughly
  2. Validate against project goals and existing code
  3. Check for ambiguities or missing details
  4. Make changes directly if needed
  5. Describe any changes made
  6. Signal [HANDOFF:confirmed] if no issues, or describe changes for validation

Code Review Gate

Implement → Test → Review → Fix → Re-review → Complete
Severity Action
Critical Must fix
Major Must fix
Minor Fix if safe, else defer

Deferred issues go in the flight log.


⚠️ Flight Completion Checklist (MANDATORY)

When you complete the FINAL leg of a flight, also complete these steps:

Step Action
1 Complete all items in the Leg Completion Checklist above
2 Update flight log — Add flight completion entry with summary
3 Update flight status — Set **Status**: landed in flight.md
4 Update mission — Check off this flight in mission.md
5 Verify all legs — Confirm all legs show completed status
6 Update project docs — Ensure CLAUDE.md, README, and other docs reflect any new commands, endpoints, configuration, or APIs introduced during the flight
7 Signal [COMPLETE:leg] (the orchestrator will trigger Phase 4)

The orchestrator will then:

  • Mark the PR ready for human review

The flight debrief is a separate step run via /flight-debrief, which transitions the flight from landed to completed.


Database Schema Changes

When a flight modifies database schemas:

  1. Include migration steps in the leg — schema changes need explicit CREATE/ALTER statements or migration commands
  2. Verify migrations run — acceptance criteria must include confirming the migration executed successfully against the live database
  3. Update SCHEMA docs — if the project maintains a SCHEMA reference, update it in the same leg that creates the migration
  4. Test against real DB — unit tests with mocks are not sufficient for schema changes; verify against the actual database

A table defined in SCHEMA but never created via migration is a gap — treat schema documentation and migration execution as a single atomic operation.


Key Principles

  1. Flight log is ground truth — Read it first, update it always
  2. Never modify in-flight legs — Create new ones instead
  3. Binary acceptance criteria — Met or not met
  4. Log everything — Decisions, deviations, anomalies
  5. Signal clearly — End of response, own line