Because of listing visibility, if no actions are assigned to a user for
an individual resource, it's excluded from the list. This is fine and
good. However, when we made a change in 0.2.0 to restrict the
information returned from listing for the anonymous user for scopes and
auth methods, it exposed the fact that because of the way this
visibility works we had to add `read` to scopes by default -- thereby
rather defeating the purpose of restricting what goes back to `u_anon`
requests.
The purpose of "no-op" is to never be used for real actions within the
API, but as something that can be granted to specifically enable
visibility for the targeted user. This makes the controls over list
visibility much more granular.
When using a disabled verifier context we were faking scope information. Due to other recent changes, this was now causing test errors. This adjusts that flow to actually query the DB, fixing tests and making them more like real code.
* Scopes inline version into update request body.
* Users inline version into update request body.
* Group inline version into update and add|set|remove member request body.
* Role inline version into update and add|set|remove grant|principal request body.
* Auth method inline version into update request body.
* Auth Account inline version into update request body.
* host catalog version is inlined for update.
* Gen after merge.
* Submitting template changes for version handling.
Don't rely on token for scopes collection actions
This requires `scope_id` to be passed (via query param) for actions on
the scopes collection; that is, listing or creating. However, it removes
the dependency on using the token for the scope of the command. For
actions on a specific scope, we use the given ID to determine the scope
we should be operating at, doing a lookup if necessary.
Existing tests have been updated. Of particular note, the CORS test was
already operating on the scopes collection so served as a good test to
ensure that from an API level the scope_id parameter was being parsed
and passed through (the tests fail without adding that query parameter
in).
* Create user handler stuff.
* Fixing Not Found errors from DB.
* Fixing param names.
* Update the proto's go package generation.
* Generate the user resource.
* Adding SDK methods for users.
* Fix the base type of Users and add tests.
* Connect user service to the controller handler.
* Attach the default org to the Test Controller's client.
* Take into account the provided request paths when the client builds the org/project path prefix.
* Adding comments to the API.
* rename repo function to repoFn.
* Fix typo in update mask errors.
* Clean up tests.
* Remove special checks for request url content in the api client and fix CORS test.
Todd Knight
Jeff Mitchell
Jim
Lars Lehtonen
Michael GaffneyandJeff Mitchell