This removes the Cartesian product in the DB for GrantsForUser in favor
of returning the actual grant scope information and dealing with it in
application code.
(cherry picked from commit 913cd536823d73994acc4f4d833208c1cc05f91b)
* Add ListResolvableAliases to the user service
There are a few non common ways this method uses our ACL
and grant system. A user is able to list resolvable
aliases for another user if they are granted permission
to do so. That means we had to load the grants for
the user being listed for and not the requester when
determining if an alias is able to resolve to a destination
for which the requested user has permission.
Similarly, the grant hash used for the list pagination
is required to be that of the user being listed and not
the requester.
* handlers/targets: always return pagination parameters in list
* handlers/authmethods: test for pagination parameters
Note that this already always returned the pagination parameters,
but now we have a test that it does so.
* handlers/accounts: test for pagination parameters
Note that this already always returned the pagination parameters,
but now we have a test that it does so.
* handlers/authtokens: test for pagination parameters
Note that this already always returned the pagination parameters,
but now we have a test that it does so.
* handlers/credentiallibraries: test for pagination parameters
Note that this already always returned the pagination parameters,
but now we have a test that it does so.
* handlers/credentials: test for pagination parameters
Note that this already always returned the pagination parameters,
but now we have a test that it does so.
* handlers/credentialstores: test for pagination parameters
Note that this already always returned the pagination parameters,
but now we have a test that it does so.
* handlers/groups: test for pagination parameters
Note that this already always returned the pagination parameters,
but now we have a test that it does so.
* handlers/host_catalogs: test for pagination parameters
Note that this already always returned the pagination parameters,
but now we have a test that it does so.
* handlers/host_sets: test for pagination parameters
Note that this already always returned the pagination parameters,
but now we have a test that it does so.
* handlers/hosts: test for pagination parameters
Note that this already always returned the pagination parameters,
but now we have a test that it does so.
* handlers/managed_groups: test for pagination parameters
Note that this already always returned the pagination parameters,
but now we have a test that it does so.
* handlers/roles: test for pagination parameters
Note that this already always returned the pagination parameters,
but now we have a test that it does so.
* handlers/scopes: test for pagination parameters
Note that this already always returned the pagination parameters,
but now we have a test that it does so.
* handlers/sessions: test for pagination parameters
Note that this already always returned the pagination parameters,
but now we have a test that it does so.
* handlers/users: test for pagination parameters
Note that this already always returned the pagination parameters,
but now we have a test that it does so.
This registers the ActionSets for each resource when the handler
packages are initialized. This then allows other packages to retrieve
the ActionSets for a given resource from the action package.
The initial consumer of this will be the ratelimit package so that it
can programmatically enumerate all of the valid combinations of a
resource and action.
This leaves a number of TODO to refactor the handler packages to also
retrieve the action sets from the registered actions instead of using a
package variable. This is left as a TODO since there is some
inconsistencies in how these package variables are used between the
handlers. For example a number of packages use a map of subtypes to
ActionSets which is then used withing the handler implementation. Others
use a map, but don't seem to use it at all. And others just use an
ActionSet.
This switches the implementation of an ActionSet from a slice to a map
to ensure the elements in an ActionSet are unique. This allows for other
packages to perform set operations such as a union or difference without
needing to account for duplicates.
* Adding explicit MPL license for sub-package.
This directory and its subdirectories (packages) contain files licensed with the MPLv2 `LICENSE` file in this directory and are intentionally licensed separately from the BSL `LICENSE` file at the root of this repository.
* Adding explicit MPL license for sub-package
This directory and its subdirectories (packages) contain files licensed with the MPLv2 `LICENSE` file in this directory and are intentionally licensed separately from the BSL `LICENSE` file at the root of this repository.
* Updating the license from MPL to Business Source License
Going forward, this project will be licensed under the Business Source License v1.1. Please see our blog post for more details at https://hashi.co/bsl-blog, FAQ at www.hashicorp.com/licensing-faq, and details of the license at www.hashicorp.com/bsl.
* Update copyright file headers to BUS-1.1
* Rerun make gen
This will pick up the last of the license changes
* Revert "Rerun make gen"
This reverts commit dbe0968bffd92745d8663c6940debae098395a6b.
* Remove copywrite from generation script
The current version of copywrite is not sophisticated enough
to only apply the copywrite changes to certain subdirectories,
so to avoid accidentally relicensing our api and sdk modules,
we will stop running the copywrite script until such time
that it can do the right thing.
* License protobuf API as MPL
The protobuf API files are used to generate the SDK,
since we want the SDK to be MPL, the protobuf files
must also be MPL. This extends to all protobuf files
whose sources end up in the SDK directory, including:
- internal/proto/controller/api
- internal/proto/controller/custom_options
- internal/proto/plugin
It also includes the generated service directory in
internal/gen/controller/api/services, since they are
generated from the protobuf sources used for the SDK.
* Change website license file name
This makes the naming scheme consistent with the rest
of the repository.
* Add note on licensing to README
* Set copywrite license to BUSL
* Revert "Add note on licensing to README"
This reverts commit 4d865a91a7a4f11605f0dc4609355d7e3c3cfffe.
---------
Co-authored-by: hashicorp-copywrite[bot] <110428419+hashicorp-copywrite[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Johan Brandhorst-Satzkorn <johan.brandhorst@gmail.com>
* testing(perms): Add Parse fuzz test
I ran this for a few minutes and it didn't discover anything catastrophic.
* Add roundtrip tests
* Fix invalid unicode parsing, empty output fields
* Do the unicode conversion once on input
* Remove incorrect fix for empty output fields
* Allow empty output_fields
This is the same behavior as output_fields=,
* Add tests back, make JSON behaviour consistent
* Rework the output fields mechanism to fix some bugs such as properly handling no fields
* Change signature of Fields
Co-authored-by: Jeff Mitchell <jeffrey.mitchell@gmail.com>
Add initial templating support to Vault credential libraries
This adds support for templating various account and user values into
Vault dynamic credential library POST bodies and GET/POST paths.
It also unifies how parameters are used in grants, with backwards
compatibility.
Although there is a compile time check on the type, it will always
succeed due to the Unimplemented embedding requirement.
As a result, this PR also changes Unimplemented calls to Unsafe calls,
which were added later "for those that prefer their code to break"; the
comments on these state:
// UnsafeXServiceServer may be embedded to opt out of forward compatibility for this service.
// Use of this interface is not recommended, as added methods to XServiceServer will
// result in compilation errors.
See https://github.com/grpc/grpc-go/issues/4500#issuecomment-852597871
for some more context.
I think we're fine with compilation errors though; we own both the
server and client side of things and generally are going to add new
methods only when we intend to also add them on the client side.
Notably, what the comment does not indicate is that it will break at
runtime; already it should return a suitable (404 or 405) error if the
client requests a method that does not exist.
* Move the server daemons into their own package
With this change the internal/server package now is dedicated to the server domain (workers and controllers) and not to the server daemons.
The hope is that this will make it easier to keep the daemons decoupled from the representation of the servers in the database.
Jeff Mitchell
Todd
Johan Brandhorst-Satzkorn
Timothy Messier
hashicorp-copywrite[bot]andJohan Brandhorst-Satzkorn
Jim
Elim Tsiagbey
Irena Rindos