This is a bit more than simply adding the action; we had some
checks to ensure that list/create could only happen/not happen
in some cases and those had to be modified to account for
subactions.
This also affected credential libraries and managed groups. It seems
that any end-to-end tests of these grants currently had them included in
wildcards instead of individually, but these types were never added to
the valid list for resources. Additionally, credential store wasn't
added as a valid top level type for pinning purposes.
Current behavior is that you need list grant on the parent scope when
recursively listing, and this is sufficient. This is good for
administrative workflows but can be unintuitive for resources that only
exist at a project level. This change allows permissions on the child
scope to also be taken into account, so that you can start a recursive
list from a parent scope without direct list support on that scope but
still get back child scopes for which list access is granted.
This also fixes a bug where visibility of a scope for recursive listing
would be based on whether the user had list resources for roles within
that scope instead of for the resource type in question.
* Remove list:self from main
As per futher discussions, we won't be supporting this, in favor of
simply read:self and cancel:self (since listing now already filters out
items on which you have no permissions).
This doesn't remove list:self entirely from the code base as much of
that will simply be converted to read:self and cancel:self -- that will
be in a later PR. However, with this removed if we want to release we
won't expose an API publicly that isn't going to stick around.
This adds parsing and validation for grant strings along with the ability to create canonical JSON and text strings from a grant.
It also adds an ACL implementation, allowing a collection of grant strings to then be checked against a resource/action tuple and indicate if it's allowed.
Note that only specific sets of provided data in grant strings is allowed. This vastly simplifies logic.
Test coverage is 100%.
A future update will consolidate and migrate types between this and IAM but I didn't want to mix that in with this.
Jeff Mitchell
Jim