* test(cli): Remove skips in CI for cli tests
* fix(enos): Fix enos bats tests
The tests still sometimes suffer from timing issues,
but I was able to run a successful run (setup, run, destroy)
of the tests from my machine at least once.
There were 2 issues:
- Some tests in groups.bats were hardcoding the default user id
- The default grants for a user in a project were missing
the permission to connect to a target. We now add this
explicitly.
Co-authored-by: Timothy Messier <tim.messier@gmail.com>
* [QTI-275] Add infrastructure integration testing
On pull requests that originate from branches of the `hashicorp/boundary`
repo, we now conditionally dispatch infrastructure integration tests using
the Enos framework. The `integration` Enos scenario includes two `builder`
variants which allow developers or CI to deploy a Boundary cluster in AWS
using either a local `boundary` install bundle or that which is produced
in the `build` workflow for CRT. The `test` variants determine which type
of infrastructure integration test to run. At present those options are
`cli_ui` (Bats CLI tests) or `smoke` (creates target instances and a
target host catalog and verifies that `boundary` works).
In addition to the new workflow and quality scenarios, we simplified the
some `build` workflow steps and added Go module caching to speed up the
build pipeline.
See the [enos/README.md](https://github.com/hashicorp/boundary/blob/main/enos/README.md)
for a detailed explanation on how to configure and execute Enos scenarios
from your machine.
Signed-off-by: Ryan Cragun <me@ryan.ec>
Co-authored-by: Rebecca Willett <rwillett@hashicorp.com>
Co-authored-by: Josh Branch <jbrand@hashicorp.com>
* refactor (controller): Use a grpc server for the grpc-gateway
This starts a grpc server for the grpc-gateway. The new gateway
server uses an in-memory listener which also supports "dialing", so
the http proxy can connect to the in-memory listener.
This change allows us to use all grpc server features and was in part
motivated by a need for an interceptor of inbound requests. With that
said, having a "proper" grpc server for the gateway will provide a lot
more flexibility and capabilities moving forward.
The request context will still be verified via middleware in the
http proxy (see wrapHandlerWithCommonFuncs). This verified context
will be serialized into a protobuf and sent along to the grpc-gateway
via metadata where an interceptor will add the verified request
info to the request's context (see requestCtxInterceptor). The
interceptor will verify the serialized request info via a shared ticket
with it's companion in-memory http proxy. FYI: the ticket is simply
random base62 string (see db.NewPrivateId).
This change also necessitated a minor change to services. We need to
return an empty response instead of nil, nil when there are no errors
and the response is empty.
* refactor (handlers): Rename gRPC Gateway filter
Originally, this was called an OutgoingInterceptor, which is an
unfortunate name since it's not an interceptor. Now that we're
refactoring the gateway stuff and have proper interceptors, renaming
this should remove ambiguity
* refactor: Rework how 204 with empty msg is handled
Recent changes to grpc gateway has necessitated a change to how
204s are handled by the gateway
* tests (bats): Check status codes for delete operations
Johan Brandhorst-SatzkornandTimothy Messier
Jim
Jeff Mitchell
Jeff Malnick