* Fix target port handling
This fixes two issues that compounded on each other (see the Changelog
update for more information):
* The verification logic for hosts was not correct for update operations
(in multiple ways) which meant that a host could be updated after
creation to have a port. Targets had a previously fixed bug where they
did not require a default port, which meant that ports could be used
from hosts
* A recent (unreleased) change had prioritized any port coming from the
host over the default port, which would mean there was no way if a
host had a port specified to use it in multiple targets.
This fixes the update verification logic, and strikes a middle ground
between breaking things and not by allowing existing addresses with
ports to be used with targets but ignoring that port, instead requiring
targets to have default port set at authorize time (currently there is
backwards compat that does not require this due to the original optional
port bug).
* Update CHANGELOG.md
Co-authored-by: Johan Brandhorst-Satzkorn <johan.brandhorst@gmail.com>
* testing(perms): Add Parse fuzz test
I ran this for a few minutes and it didn't discover anything catastrophic.
* Add roundtrip tests
* Fix invalid unicode parsing, empty output fields
* Do the unicode conversion once on input
* Remove incorrect fix for empty output fields
* Allow empty output_fields
This is the same behavior as output_fields=,
* Add tests back, make JSON behaviour consistent
* Rework the output fields mechanism to fix some bugs such as properly handling no fields
* Change signature of Fields
Co-authored-by: Jeff Mitchell <jeffrey.mitchell@gmail.com>
Although there is a compile time check on the type, it will always
succeed due to the Unimplemented embedding requirement.
As a result, this PR also changes Unimplemented calls to Unsafe calls,
which were added later "for those that prefer their code to break"; the
comments on these state:
// UnsafeXServiceServer may be embedded to opt out of forward compatibility for this service.
// Use of this interface is not recommended, as added methods to XServiceServer will
// result in compilation errors.
See https://github.com/grpc/grpc-go/issues/4500#issuecomment-852597871
for some more context.
I think we're fine with compilation errors though; we own both the
server and client side of things and generally are going to add new
methods only when we intend to also add them on the client side.
Notably, what the comment does not indicate is that it will break at
runtime; already it should return a suitable (404 or 405) error if the
client requests a method that does not exist.
* Move the server daemons into their own package
With this change the internal/server package now is dedicated to the server domain (workers and controllers) and not to the server daemons.
The hope is that this will make it easier to keep the daemons decoupled from the representation of the servers in the database.
Danielle Miu
Damian Debkowski
Louis Ruch
Hugo Vieira
Jeff Mitchell
Johan Brandhorst-Satzkorn
Irena Rindos
Jim
Todd