* Remove list:self from main
As per futher discussions, we won't be supporting this, in favor of
simply read:self and cancel:self (since listing now already filters out
items on which you have no permissions).
This doesn't remove list:self entirely from the code base as much of
that will simply be converted to read:self and cancel:self -- that will
be in a later PR. However, with this removed if we want to release we
won't expose an API publicly that isn't going to stick around.
This was always an RPC-only distinction and from that perspective it
makes sense; however it causes the generated docs to treat it as an
entirely separate service even though it's under the same collection
path as auth methods and this is confusing.
* Possible api changes.
* Worker API update.
* Updating import alias name.
* Moving session down a level as a member of the GetSessionResponse.
* Marshal the auth flag into the GetSessionResponse proto instead of the session.
* Scopes inline version into update request body.
* Users inline version into update request body.
* Group inline version into update and add|set|remove member request body.
* Role inline version into update and add|set|remove grant|principal request body.
* Auth method inline version into update request body.
* Auth Account inline version into update request body.
* host catalog version is inlined for update.
* Gen after merge.
* Submitting template changes for version handling.
* Start adding version to host resources and fixing up tests
* Add versioning to host resources and update API tests
* Fix nil in test
* Add missing update
Don't rely on token for scopes collection actions
This requires `scope_id` to be passed (via query param) for actions on
the scopes collection; that is, listing or creating. However, it removes
the dependency on using the token for the scope of the command. For
actions on a specific scope, we use the given ID to determine the scope
we should be operating at, doing a lookup if necessary.
Existing tests have been updated. Of particular note, the CORS test was
already operating on the scopes collection so served as a good test to
ensure that from an API level the scope_id parameter was being parsed
and passed through (the tests fail without adding that query parameter
in).
Todd Knight
