* Adds job repo
* Adds scheduler
* Adds plugin table which is a place holder for future expansion of the scheduler. Currently all jobs that are created are linked to the pi_system plugin which are jobs that are held in a local registeredJobs map populated at controller startup.
This PR changes delete behavior:
* On success, a 204 is returned rather than a 200 with an empty JSON object
* The CLI now passes through the 404 error if encountered instead of swallowing it
It also updates formatting for JSON to use the response body, which means that the item (or items) in the JSON format are actually the format across the wire, instead of being reinterpreted by unmarshaling into the Go SDK and then remarshaling.
Because of listing visibility, if no actions are assigned to a user for
an individual resource, it's excluded from the list. This is fine and
good. However, when we made a change in 0.2.0 to restrict the
information returned from listing for the anonymous user for scopes and
auth methods, it exposed the fact that because of the way this
visibility works we had to add `read` to scopes by default -- thereby
rather defeating the purpose of restricting what goes back to `u_anon`
requests.
The purpose of "no-op" is to never be used for real actions within the
API, but as something that can be granted to specifically enable
visibility for the targeted user. This makes the controls over list
visibility much more granular.
This keeps only essential information in list output for auth methods
when the user is u_anon. Boundary's default is to allow listing of
auth methods for anonymous users to allow discovery of authentication
points, but there's no need to return more information about internal
configuration than necessary.
BK clued me into the fact that for some types, similar alignment
problems exist as with the normal atomic package (e.g. 64-bit types on
32-bit architectures) if they are not pointer values. So change the few
places they weren't pointers to pointers.
None of these are 64-bit, but it feels like best practice for using the
library and should just standardize on it.
When using a disabled verifier context we were faking scope information. Due to other recent changes, this was now causing test errors. This adjusts that flow to actually query the DB, fixing tests and making them more like real code.
Current behavior is that you need list grant on the parent scope when
recursively listing, and this is sufficient. This is good for
administrative workflows but can be unintuitive for resources that only
exist at a project level. This change allows permissions on the child
scope to also be taken into account, so that you can start a recursive
list from a parent scope without direct list support on that scope but
still get back child scopes for which list access is granted.
This also fixes a bug where visibility of a scope for recursive listing
would be based on whether the user had list resources for roles within
that scope instead of for the resource type in question.
Currently this would validate that a KeyId was in the returned wrapper
but then return the base wrapper; and if it required a database lookup
it wouldn't validate it anyways.
All uses of this were for decryption so it didn't actually affect
anything to this point (you'd error later instead of sooner) but for any
case where we need to encrypt against a specific version or derive a key
against a specific version this would be broken, in a way that could
lead you to use the wrong key version.
This also properly sends the Key ID around sessions. This worked
currently for the same reason as above but would have broken for any
session in flight once a key was rotated.
* Sessions support for read:self and cancel:self permissions. This is automatic with fallback; no API change is needed.
* Strips out values from listing if only self actions are allowed on the resource and the user ID is different. This prevents a default ACL of id=*;type=session;actions=read:self,cancel:self from causing all values to be visible when listing.
* Adds an unprivileged user to development/testing instances. This user has only default permissions plus the ability to authorize sessions in the default target.
* Remove list:self from main
As per futher discussions, we won't be supporting this, in favor of
simply read:self and cancel:self (since listing now already filters out
items on which you have no permissions).
This doesn't remove list:self entirely from the code base as much of
that will simply be converted to read:self and cancel:self -- that will
be in a later PR. However, with this removed if we want to release we
won't expose an API publicly that isn't going to stick around.
Jeff Mitchell
Louis Ruch
Jim
s-christoff
Todd Knight
Lars Lehtonen
