This commit changes the logic around selecting jobs to run. Before this, Boundary used a view "job_jobs_to_run" which was a collation of all jobs that were not running and scheduled to run. When jobs were requested to run, Boundary would look at this view, grab a certain amount of jobs and insert them into the "job_run" table. Importantly, while the amount of jobs to be scheduled at once defaulted to 1 in the scheduler package, this was entirely overriden in the controller package to -1 (no limit, run all jobs that the query would return). With this commit, Boundary now looks at the "job" table directly for jobs to run, regardless of job run status. This was done to improve DB performance as the view (which queried all "job_run" rows) was causing significant DB contention. Additionally, the option to limit job runs is now removed since it was already hardcoded to -1 and not user-configurable anyways. Should the need arise to implement this limit again, this will have to be done in a different way since the new query does not account for running jobs and limiting the rows returned after jobs are already running would yield a no-op (the new query inserts nothing into "job_run" if any given job is already running).
434 lines
12 KiB
Go
434 lines
12 KiB
Go
// Copyright (c) HashiCorp, Inc.
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: BUSL-1.1
|
|
|
|
package scheduler
|
|
|
|
import (
|
|
"context"
|
|
"sync"
|
|
"testing"
|
|
"time"
|
|
|
|
"github.com/hashicorp/boundary/internal/db"
|
|
"github.com/hashicorp/boundary/internal/errors"
|
|
"github.com/hashicorp/boundary/internal/iam"
|
|
"github.com/hashicorp/boundary/internal/kms"
|
|
"github.com/hashicorp/boundary/internal/scheduler/job"
|
|
"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
|
|
"github.com/stretchr/testify/require"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
func TestScheduler_New(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
ctx := context.Background()
|
|
conn, _ := db.TestSetup(t, "postgres")
|
|
rw := db.New(conn)
|
|
wrapper := db.TestWrapper(t)
|
|
kmsCache := kms.TestKms(t, conn, wrapper)
|
|
iam.TestRepo(t, conn, wrapper)
|
|
|
|
jobRepoFn := func() (*job.Repository, error) {
|
|
return job.NewRepository(ctx, rw, rw, kmsCache)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
type args struct {
|
|
serverId string
|
|
jobRepo jobRepoFactory
|
|
runInterval time.Duration
|
|
monitorInterval time.Duration
|
|
}
|
|
tests := []struct {
|
|
name string
|
|
args args
|
|
opts []Option
|
|
want args
|
|
wantErr bool
|
|
wantErrCode errors.Code
|
|
wantErrMsg string
|
|
}{
|
|
{
|
|
name: "with-no-server-id",
|
|
wantErr: true,
|
|
wantErrCode: errors.InvalidParameter,
|
|
wantErrMsg: "scheduler.New: missing server id: parameter violation: error #100",
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "with-no-job-repo",
|
|
args: args{
|
|
serverId: "test-server",
|
|
},
|
|
wantErr: true,
|
|
wantErrCode: errors.InvalidParameter,
|
|
wantErrMsg: "scheduler.New: missing job repo function: parameter violation: error #100",
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "valid",
|
|
args: args{
|
|
serverId: "test-server",
|
|
jobRepo: jobRepoFn,
|
|
},
|
|
want: args{
|
|
serverId: "test-server",
|
|
runInterval: defaultRunJobsInterval,
|
|
monitorInterval: defaultMonitorInterval,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "valid-with-interval",
|
|
args: args{
|
|
serverId: "test-server",
|
|
jobRepo: jobRepoFn,
|
|
},
|
|
opts: []Option{
|
|
WithRunJobsInterval(time.Hour),
|
|
},
|
|
want: args{
|
|
serverId: "test-server",
|
|
monitorInterval: defaultMonitorInterval,
|
|
runInterval: time.Hour,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "valid-with-unlimited",
|
|
args: args{
|
|
serverId: "test-server",
|
|
jobRepo: jobRepoFn,
|
|
},
|
|
opts: []Option{},
|
|
want: args{
|
|
serverId: "test-server",
|
|
runInterval: defaultRunJobsInterval,
|
|
monitorInterval: defaultMonitorInterval,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "valid-with-limit",
|
|
args: args{
|
|
serverId: "test-server",
|
|
jobRepo: jobRepoFn,
|
|
},
|
|
opts: []Option{},
|
|
want: args{
|
|
serverId: "test-server",
|
|
runInterval: defaultRunJobsInterval,
|
|
monitorInterval: defaultMonitorInterval,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "valid-with-monitor",
|
|
args: args{
|
|
serverId: "test-server",
|
|
jobRepo: jobRepoFn,
|
|
},
|
|
opts: []Option{
|
|
WithMonitorInterval(time.Hour),
|
|
},
|
|
want: args{
|
|
serverId: "test-server",
|
|
runInterval: defaultRunJobsInterval,
|
|
monitorInterval: time.Hour,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "valid-with-all",
|
|
args: args{
|
|
serverId: "test-server",
|
|
jobRepo: jobRepoFn,
|
|
},
|
|
opts: []Option{
|
|
WithRunJobsInterval(time.Hour),
|
|
WithMonitorInterval(2 * time.Hour),
|
|
},
|
|
want: args{
|
|
serverId: "test-server",
|
|
runInterval: time.Hour,
|
|
monitorInterval: 2 * time.Hour,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for _, tt := range tests {
|
|
tt := tt
|
|
t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
assert, require := assert.New(t), require.New(t)
|
|
got, err := New(ctx, tt.args.serverId, tt.args.jobRepo, tt.opts...)
|
|
if tt.wantErr {
|
|
require.Error(err)
|
|
assert.Truef(errors.Match(errors.T(tt.wantErrCode), err), "Unexpected error %s", err)
|
|
assert.Equal(tt.wantErrMsg, err.Error())
|
|
assert.Nil(got)
|
|
return
|
|
}
|
|
require.NoError(err)
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(tt.want.serverId, got.serverId)
|
|
assert.Equal(tt.want.runInterval, got.runJobsInterval)
|
|
assert.Equal(tt.want.monitorInterval, got.monitorInterval)
|
|
assert.NotNil(got.jobRepoFn)
|
|
assert.NotNil(got.runningJobs)
|
|
assert.NotNil(got.registeredJobs)
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestScheduler_RegisterJob(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
conn, _ := db.TestSetup(t, "postgres")
|
|
rw := db.New(conn)
|
|
wrapper := db.TestWrapper(t)
|
|
iam.TestRepo(t, conn, wrapper)
|
|
|
|
sched := TestScheduler(t, conn, wrapper)
|
|
|
|
tests := []struct {
|
|
name string
|
|
job Job
|
|
wantErr bool
|
|
wantErrCode errors.Code
|
|
wantErrMsg string
|
|
}{
|
|
{
|
|
name: "nil-job",
|
|
wantErr: true,
|
|
wantErrCode: errors.InvalidParameter,
|
|
wantErrMsg: "scheduler.(Scheduler).RegisterJob: scheduler.validateJob: missing job: parameter violation: error #100",
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "missing-job-name",
|
|
job: testJob{},
|
|
wantErr: true,
|
|
wantErrCode: errors.InvalidParameter,
|
|
wantErrMsg: "scheduler.(Scheduler).RegisterJob: scheduler.validateJob: missing name: parameter violation: error #100",
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "missing-job-description",
|
|
job: testJob{
|
|
name: "name",
|
|
},
|
|
wantErr: true,
|
|
wantErrCode: errors.InvalidParameter,
|
|
wantErrMsg: "scheduler.(Scheduler).RegisterJob: scheduler.validateJob: missing description: parameter violation: error #100",
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "valid",
|
|
job: testJob{
|
|
name: "valid",
|
|
description: "description",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for _, tt := range tests {
|
|
tt := tt
|
|
t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
assert, require := assert.New(t), require.New(t)
|
|
err := sched.RegisterJob(context.Background(), tt.job)
|
|
if tt.wantErr {
|
|
require.Error(err)
|
|
assert.Truef(errors.Match(errors.T(tt.wantErrCode), err), "Unexpected error %s", err)
|
|
assert.Equal(tt.wantErrMsg, err.Error())
|
|
return
|
|
}
|
|
require.NoError(err)
|
|
|
|
j, ok := sched.registeredJobs.Load(tt.job.Name())
|
|
require.True(ok)
|
|
require.NotNil(j)
|
|
assert.Equal(tt.job, j)
|
|
|
|
// Verify job has been persisted
|
|
var dbJob job.Job
|
|
err = rw.LookupWhere(context.Background(), &dbJob, "name = ?", []any{tt.job.Name()})
|
|
require.NoError(err)
|
|
require.NotNil(dbJob)
|
|
assert.Equal(tt.job.Name(), dbJob.Name)
|
|
assert.Equal(tt.job.Description(), dbJob.Description)
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
t.Run("multiple-same-job", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
assert, require := assert.New(t), require.New(t)
|
|
tj := testJob{
|
|
name: "multiple-same-job",
|
|
description: "description",
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Job should not be registered
|
|
_, ok := sched.registeredJobs.Load(tj.name)
|
|
assert.False(ok)
|
|
|
|
err := sched.RegisterJob(context.Background(), tj)
|
|
require.NoError(err)
|
|
|
|
// Job should now be registered
|
|
_, ok = sched.registeredJobs.Load(tj.name)
|
|
assert.True(ok)
|
|
|
|
// Registering the same job should not return an error
|
|
err = sched.RegisterJob(context.Background(), tj)
|
|
require.NoError(err)
|
|
|
|
// Job should still be registered
|
|
_, ok = sched.registeredJobs.Load(tj.name)
|
|
assert.True(ok)
|
|
})
|
|
t.Run("multiple-schedulers-registering-same-job", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
assert, require := assert.New(t), require.New(t)
|
|
tj := testJob{
|
|
name: "multiple-schedulers-registering-same-job",
|
|
description: "description",
|
|
}
|
|
err := sched.RegisterJob(context.Background(), tj)
|
|
require.NoError(err)
|
|
_, ok := sched.registeredJobs.Load(tj.name)
|
|
assert.True(ok)
|
|
|
|
sched1 := TestScheduler(t, conn, wrapper)
|
|
// Verify job is not registered on second scheduler
|
|
_, ok = sched1.registeredJobs.Load(tj.name)
|
|
assert.False(ok)
|
|
|
|
// Registering job on second scheduler should not return an error and should be registered
|
|
err = sched1.RegisterJob(context.Background(), tj)
|
|
require.NoError(err)
|
|
_, ok = sched.registeredJobs.Load(tj.name)
|
|
assert.True(ok)
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestScheduler_UpdateJobNextRunInAtLeast(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
conn, _ := db.TestSetup(t, "postgres")
|
|
rw := db.New(conn)
|
|
wrapper := db.TestWrapper(t)
|
|
iam.TestRepo(t, conn, wrapper)
|
|
|
|
sched := TestScheduler(t, conn, wrapper)
|
|
|
|
t.Run("missing-job-name", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
assert, require := assert.New(t), require.New(t)
|
|
|
|
err := sched.UpdateJobNextRunInAtLeast(context.Background(), "", time.Hour)
|
|
require.Error(err)
|
|
assert.Truef(errors.Match(errors.T(errors.InvalidParameter), err), "Unexpected error %s", err)
|
|
assert.Equal("scheduler.(Scheduler).UpdateJobNextRunInAtLeast: missing name: parameter violation: error #100", err.Error())
|
|
})
|
|
t.Run("job-not-found", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
assert, require := assert.New(t), require.New(t)
|
|
|
|
// Insert fake job to bypass registration check
|
|
sched.registeredJobs.Store("fake-job-name", nil)
|
|
|
|
err := sched.UpdateJobNextRunInAtLeast(context.Background(), "fake-job-name", time.Hour)
|
|
require.Error(err)
|
|
assert.Truef(errors.Match(errors.T(errors.RecordNotFound), err), "Unexpected error %s", err)
|
|
assert.Equal("scheduler.(Scheduler).UpdateJobNextRunInAtLeast: job.(Repository).UpdateJobNextRunInAtLeast: db.DoTx: job.(Repository).UpdateJobNextRunInAtLeast: job \"fake-job-name\" does not exist: search issue: error #1100", err.Error())
|
|
})
|
|
t.Run("valid", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
assert, require := assert.New(t), require.New(t)
|
|
|
|
tj := testJob{
|
|
name: "valid",
|
|
description: "description",
|
|
}
|
|
err := sched.RegisterJob(context.Background(), tj, WithNextRunIn(2*time.Hour))
|
|
require.NoError(err)
|
|
|
|
// get job from repo
|
|
var dbJob job.Job
|
|
err = rw.LookupWhere(context.Background(), &dbJob, "name = ?", []any{tj.name})
|
|
require.NoError(err)
|
|
previousNextRun := dbJob.NextScheduledRun.AsTime()
|
|
|
|
err = sched.UpdateJobNextRunInAtLeast(context.Background(), tj.name, time.Hour)
|
|
require.NoError(err)
|
|
|
|
err = rw.LookupWhere(context.Background(), &dbJob, "name = ?", []any{tj.name})
|
|
require.NoError(err)
|
|
// Verify job run time in repo is at least 1 hour before than the previous run time
|
|
assert.Equal(previousNextRun.Add(-1*time.Hour).Round(time.Minute), dbJob.NextScheduledRun.AsTime().Round(time.Minute))
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
t.Run("next-run-already-sooner", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
assert, require := assert.New(t), require.New(t)
|
|
|
|
tj := testJob{
|
|
name: "next-run-already-sooner",
|
|
description: "description",
|
|
}
|
|
err := sched.RegisterJob(context.Background(), tj, WithNextRunIn(2*time.Hour))
|
|
require.NoError(err)
|
|
|
|
// get job from repo
|
|
var dbJob job.Job
|
|
err = rw.LookupWhere(context.Background(), &dbJob, "name = ?", []any{tj.name})
|
|
require.NoError(err)
|
|
previousNextRun := dbJob.NextScheduledRun.AsTime()
|
|
|
|
err = sched.UpdateJobNextRunInAtLeast(context.Background(), tj.name, 4*time.Hour)
|
|
require.NoError(err)
|
|
|
|
err = rw.LookupWhere(context.Background(), &dbJob, "name = ?", []any{tj.name})
|
|
require.NoError(err)
|
|
// Job should not have updated next run time, since its later than the already scheduled time
|
|
assert.Equal(previousNextRun, dbJob.NextScheduledRun.AsTime())
|
|
|
|
err = sched.UpdateJobNextRunInAtLeast(context.Background(), tj.name, time.Hour)
|
|
require.NoError(err)
|
|
|
|
err = rw.LookupWhere(context.Background(), &dbJob, "name = ?", []any{tj.name})
|
|
require.NoError(err)
|
|
// Verify job run time in repo is at least 1 hour before than the previous run time
|
|
assert.Equal(previousNextRun.Add(-1*time.Hour).Round(time.Minute), dbJob.NextScheduledRun.AsTime().Round(time.Minute))
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestScheduler_Start(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
conn, _ := db.TestSetup(t, "postgres")
|
|
wrapper := db.TestWrapper(t)
|
|
iam.TestRepo(t, conn, wrapper)
|
|
|
|
sched := TestScheduler(t, conn, wrapper)
|
|
|
|
tests := []struct {
|
|
name string
|
|
ctx context.Context
|
|
wg *sync.WaitGroup
|
|
wantErr bool
|
|
wantErrContains string
|
|
}{
|
|
{
|
|
name: "missing-ctx",
|
|
wg: &sync.WaitGroup{},
|
|
wantErr: true,
|
|
wantErrContains: "missing context",
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "missing-waitgroup",
|
|
ctx: context.Background(),
|
|
wantErr: true,
|
|
wantErrContains: "missing wait group",
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
name: "valid",
|
|
ctx: context.Background(),
|
|
wg: &sync.WaitGroup{},
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
for _, tt := range tests {
|
|
t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
assert, require := assert.New(t), require.New(t)
|
|
err := sched.Start(tt.ctx, tt.wg)
|
|
if tt.wantErr {
|
|
require.Error(err)
|
|
if tt.wantErrContains != "" {
|
|
assert.Contains(err.Error(), tt.wantErrContains)
|
|
}
|
|
return
|
|
}
|
|
require.NoError(err)
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
}
|