Files
threshold/internal/perms/acl.go
T
Todd 0d67b86543 Add ListResolvableAliases to the user service (#4609)
* Add ListResolvableAliases to the user service

There are a few non common ways this method uses our ACL
and grant system. A user is able to list resolvable
aliases for another user if they are granted permission
to do so. That means we had to load the grants for
the user being listed for and not the requester when
determining if an alias is able to resolve to a destination
for which the requested user has permission.

Similarly, the grant hash used for the list pagination
is required to be that of the user being listed and not
the requester.
2024-04-17 08:26:46 -07:00

390 lines
13 KiB
Go

// Copyright (c) HashiCorp, Inc.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: BUSL-1.1
package perms
import (
"strings"
"github.com/hashicorp/boundary/globals"
"github.com/hashicorp/boundary/internal/types/action"
"github.com/hashicorp/boundary/internal/types/resource"
"github.com/hashicorp/boundary/sdk/pbs/controller/api/resources/scopes"
)
// AclGrant is used to decouple API-based grants from those we utilize for ACLs.
// Notably it uses a single ID per grant instead of multiple IDs.
type AclGrant struct {
// The scope ID, which will be a project ID or an org ID
scope Scope
// The ID to use
id string
// The type, if provided
typ resource.Type
// The set of actions being granted
actions actionSet
// The set of output fields granted
OutputFields *OutputFields
}
// Actions returns the actions as a slice from the internal map, along with the
// string representations of those actions.
func (a AclGrant) Actions() ([]action.Type, []string) {
return a.actions.Actions()
}
// ACL provides an entry point into the permissions engine for determining if an
// action is allowed on a resource based on a principal's (user or group) grants.
type ACL struct {
scopeMap map[string][]AclGrant
}
// ACLResults provides a type for the permission's engine results so that we can
// pass more detailed information along in the future if we want. It was useful
// in Vault, may be useful here.
type ACLResults struct {
AuthenticationFinished bool
Authorized bool
OutputFields *OutputFields
// This is included but unexported for testing/debugging
scopeMap map[string][]AclGrant
}
// Permission provides information about the specific
// resources that a user has been granted access to for a given scope, resource, and action.
type Permission struct {
ScopeId string // The scope id for which the permission applies.
Resource resource.Type
Action action.Type
ResourceIds []string // Any specific resource ids that have been referred in the grant's `id` field, if applicable.
OnlySelf bool // The grant only allows actions against the user's own resources.
All bool // We got a wildcard in the grant string's `id` field.
}
// UserPermissions is a set of Permissions for a User.
type UserPermissions struct {
UserId string
Permissions []Permission
}
// Resource defines something within boundary that requires authorization
// capabilities. Resources must have a ScopeId.
type Resource struct {
// ScopeId is the scope that contains the Resource.
ScopeId string `json:"scope_id,omitempty"`
// Id is the public id of the resource.
Id string `json:"id,omitempty"`
// Type of resource.
Type resource.Type `json:"type,omitempty"`
// Pin if defined would constrain the resource within the collection of the
// pin id.
Pin string `json:"pin,omitempty"`
}
// NewACL creates an ACL from the grants provided. Note that this converts the
// API-based Grants to AclGrants.
func NewACL(grants ...Grant) ACL {
ret := ACL{
scopeMap: make(map[string][]AclGrant, len(grants)),
}
for _, grant := range grants {
switch {
case len(grant.ids) > 0:
for _, id := range grant.ids {
ret.scopeMap[grant.scope.Id] = append(ret.scopeMap[grant.scope.Id], aclGrantFromGrant(grant, id))
}
default:
// This handles the no-ID case as well as the deprecated single-ID case
ret.scopeMap[grant.scope.Id] = append(ret.scopeMap[grant.scope.Id], aclGrantFromGrant(grant, grant.id))
}
}
return ret
}
func aclGrantFromGrant(grant Grant, id string) AclGrant {
return AclGrant{
scope: grant.scope,
id: id,
typ: grant.typ,
actions: grant.actions,
OutputFields: grant.OutputFields,
}
}
// Allowed determines if the grants for an ACL allow an action for a resource.
func (a ACL) Allowed(r Resource, aType action.Type, userId string, opt ...Option) (results ACLResults) {
opts := getOpts(opt...)
// First, get the grants within the specified scope
grants := a.scopeMap[r.ScopeId]
results.scopeMap = a.scopeMap
var parentAction action.Type
split := strings.Split(aType.String(), ":")
if len(split) == 2 {
parentAction = action.Map[split[0]]
}
// Now, go through and check the cases indicated above
for _, grant := range grants {
var outputFieldsOnly bool
switch {
case len(grant.actions) == 0:
// Continue with the next grant, unless we have output fields
// specified in which case we continue to be able to apply the
// output fields depending on ID and type.
if _, hasSetFields := grant.OutputFields.Fields(); hasSetFields {
outputFieldsOnly = true
} else {
continue
}
case grant.actions[aType]:
// We have this action
case grant.actions[parentAction]:
// We don't have this action, but it's a subaction and we have the
// parent action. As an example, if we are looking for "read:self"
// and have "read", this is sufficient.
case grant.actions[action.All]:
// All actions are allowed
default:
// No actions in the grant match what we're looking for, so continue
// with the next grant
continue
}
// We step through all grants, to fetch the full list of output fields.
// However, we shortcut if we find *.
//
// If the action was not found above but we did find output fields in
// patterns that match, we do not authorize the request, but we do build
// up the output fields patterns.
//
// Note that when using IsActionOrParent it is merely to test whether it
// is an allowed format since some formats operate ony on collections
// (or don't operate at all on collections) and we want to ensure that
// it is/isn't a create or list command or subcommand to know whether
// that form is valid. The actual checking of whether the given action
// is granted to the user already happened above.
var found bool
switch {
// Case 1: We only allow specific actions on specific types for the
// anonymous user. ID being supplied or not doesn't matter in this case,
// it must be an explicit type and action(s); adding this as an explicit
// case here prevents duplicating logic in two of the other more
// general-purpose cases below (3 and 4). See notes there about ID being
// present or not.
case !opts.withSkipAnonymousUserRestrictions &&
(userId == globals.AnonymousUserId || userId == ""):
switch {
// Allow discovery of scopes, so that auth methods within can be
// discovered
case grant.typ == r.Type &&
grant.typ == resource.Scope &&
(aType == action.List || aType == action.NoOp):
found = true
// Allow discovery of and authenticating to auth methods
case grant.typ == r.Type &&
grant.typ == resource.AuthMethod &&
(aType == action.List || aType == action.NoOp || aType == action.Authenticate):
found = true
}
// Case 2:
// id=<resource.id>;actions=<action> where ID cannot be a wildcard; or
// id=<resource.id>;output_fields=<fields> where fields cannot be a
// wildcard.
case grant.id == r.Id &&
grant.id != "" &&
grant.id != "*" &&
(grant.typ == resource.Unknown || grant.typ == globals.ResourceInfoFromPrefix(grant.id).Type) &&
!action.List.IsActionOrParent(aType) &&
!action.Create.IsActionOrParent(aType):
found = true
// Case 3: type=<resource.type>;actions=<action> when action is list or
// create (cannot be a wildcard). Must be a top level collection,
// otherwise must be one of the two formats specified in cases 4 or 5.
// Or, type=resource.type;output_fields=<fields> and no action. This is
// more of a semantic difference compared to 4 more than a security
// difference; this type is for clarity as it ties more closely to the
// concept of create and list as actions on a collection, operating on a
// collection directly. The format in case 4 will still work for
// create/list on collections but that's more of a shortcut to allow
// things like id=*;type=*;actions=* for admin flows so that you don't
// need to separate out explicit collection actions into separate typed
// grants for each collection within a role. This does mean there are
// "two ways of doing things" but it's a reasonable UX tradeoff given
// that "all IDs" can reasonably be construed to include "and the one
// I'm making" and "all of them for listing".
case grant.id == "" &&
r.Id == "" &&
grant.typ == r.Type &&
grant.typ != resource.Unknown &&
resource.TopLevelType(r.Type) &&
(action.List.IsActionOrParent(aType) ||
action.Create.IsActionOrParent(aType)):
found = true
// Case 4:
// id=*;type=<resource.type>;actions=<action> where type cannot be
// unknown but can be a wildcard to allow any resource at all; or
// id=*;type=<resource.type>;output_fields=<fields> with no action.
case grant.id == "*" &&
grant.typ != resource.Unknown &&
(grant.typ == r.Type ||
grant.typ == resource.All):
found = true
// Case 5:
// id=<pin>;type=<resource.type>;actions=<action> where type can be a
// wildcard and this this is operating on a non-top-level type. Same for
// output fields only.
case grant.id != "" &&
grant.id == r.Pin &&
grant.typ != resource.Unknown &&
(grant.typ == r.Type || grant.typ == resource.All) &&
!resource.TopLevelType(r.Type):
found = true
}
if found {
if !outputFieldsOnly {
results.Authorized = true
}
fields, _ := grant.OutputFields.Fields()
results.OutputFields = results.OutputFields.AddFields(fields)
if results.OutputFields.Has("*") && results.Authorized {
return
}
}
}
return
}
// ListResolvablePermissions builds a set of Permissions based on the grants in
// the ACL. The permissions will only be created if there is at least
// one grant of the provided resource type that includes at least one of the
// provided actions in the action set.
// Note that unlike the ListPermissions method, this method does not attempt to
// generate permissions for the u_recovery user. To get the resolvable aliases
// for u_recovery, the user could simply query all aliases with a destination id.
func (a ACL) ListResolvablePermissions(requestedType resource.Type, actions action.ActionSet) []Permission {
perms := make([]Permission, 0, len(a.scopeMap))
for scopeId := range a.scopeMap {
// Consider all scopes in the grants. They may not exist, but if that is
// the case the
p := Permission{
ScopeId: scopeId,
Resource: requestedType,
Action: action.ListResolvableAliases,
OnlySelf: true, // default to only self to be restrictive
}
if a.buildPermission(scopeId, requestedType, actions, &p) {
perms = append(perms, p)
}
}
return perms
}
// ListPermissions builds a set of Permissions based on the grants in the ACL.
// Permissions are determined for the given resource for each of the provided scopes.
// There must be a grant for a given resource for one of the provided "id actions"
// or for action.All in order for a Permission to be created for the scope.
// The set of "id actions" is resource dependant, but will generally include all
// actions that can be taken on an individual resource.
func (a ACL) ListPermissions(requestedScopes map[string]*scopes.ScopeInfo,
requestedType resource.Type,
idActions action.ActionSet,
userId string,
) []Permission {
perms := make([]Permission, 0, len(requestedScopes))
for scopeId := range requestedScopes {
p := Permission{
ScopeId: scopeId,
Resource: requestedType,
Action: action.List,
OnlySelf: true, // default to only self to be restrictive
}
if userId == globals.RecoveryUserId {
p.All = true
p.OnlySelf = false
perms = append(perms, p)
continue
}
if a.buildPermission(scopeId, requestedType, idActions, &p) {
perms = append(perms, p)
}
}
return perms
}
// buildPermission populates the provided permission with either the resource ids
// or marking All to true if there are grants that have an action that match
// one of the provided idActions for the provided type
func (a ACL) buildPermission(scopeId string,
requestedType resource.Type,
idActions action.ActionSet,
p *Permission,
) bool {
// Get grants for a specific scope id from the source of truth.
grants := a.scopeMap[scopeId]
for _, grant := range grants {
// This grant doesn't match what we're looking for, ignore.
if grant.typ != requestedType && grant.typ != resource.All && globals.ResourceInfoFromPrefix(grant.id).Type != requestedType {
continue
}
// We found a grant that matches the requested resource type:
// Search to see if one or all actions in the action set have been granted.
found := false
if ok := grant.actions[action.All]; ok {
found = true
} else {
for idA := range idActions {
if ok := grant.actions[idA]; ok {
found = true
break
}
}
}
if !found { // In this case, none of the requested actions were granted for the given scope id.
continue
}
actions, _ := grant.Actions()
excludeList := make(action.ActionSet, len(actions))
for _, aa := range actions {
if aa != action.List {
excludeList.Add(aa)
}
}
p.OnlySelf = p.OnlySelf && excludeList.OnlySelf()
switch grant.id {
case "*":
p.All = true
case "":
continue
default:
p.ResourceIds = append(p.ResourceIds, grant.id)
}
}
return p.All || len(p.ResourceIds) > 0
}