239 lines
21 KiB
Plaintext
239 lines
21 KiB
Plaintext
|
|
Episode: 1533
|
||
|
|
Title: HPR1533: Beginner's guide to the night sky 2
|
||
|
|
Source: https://hub.hackerpublicradio.org/ccdn.php?filename=/eps/hpr1533/hpr1533.mp3
|
||
|
|
Transcribed: 2025-10-18 04:46:07
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
---
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Yeah this is a good time.
|
||
|
|
Thank you.
|
||
|
|
Hello and welcome to episode 2 in the series of podcasts that I've entitled A Beginner's
|
||
|
|
Guide to the Night Sky. So two apologies. First of all, I apologise for not mentioning
|
||
|
|
HPR Hacker Public Radio in the previous episode. This was because when I recorded it, I had
|
||
|
|
no idea where it was going to be released and it was at the suggestion of Nibble, also known
|
||
|
|
as Enwai Bill, and when to go, I think, on the status net ferry verse, that I released
|
||
|
|
it in Hacker Public Radio. So thank you to them and a big hello to all you out there in
|
||
|
|
Hacker Public Radio. Please do consider recording this jewel if you haven't already done so.
|
||
|
|
The second apology I have to make is for the huge gap between episodes 1 and 2, is it
|
||
|
|
six months? Is it really six months? Well, I think it does. Well, that's just life, isn't
|
||
|
|
it? It gets in the way sometimes. So I got some lovely feedback on the first episode I
|
||
|
|
have to say. In no particular order, Dave Morris got in touch to see how much she enjoyed
|
||
|
|
it and actually, coincidentally, I was quite enjoying a couple of episodes that Dave has
|
||
|
|
put out in the recent past. Also, Neander Geek got in touch to let me know about an
|
||
|
|
HPR episode that I had missed. I can't believe I missed it. It was episode 1366, and he was
|
||
|
|
talking about K-stars and using this Raspberry Pi with a telescope, and I do recommend that
|
||
|
|
you go and listen to that. Thank you, Neander Geek, for getting in touch. Also, Poki left
|
||
|
|
a nice comment on the HPR website, and Vanden said some kind words, but felt that I gave
|
||
|
|
the moon illusion short shrift. Maybe I'll return to the moon illusion in a future episode.
|
||
|
|
But anyway, thank you for all that feedback. Always welcome. So I think six months ago,
|
||
|
|
I promised in the second episode I would look at astronomy software, and I'm going through
|
||
|
|
my word. I am going to do that, and I'm going to look at four bits of software. The first two
|
||
|
|
are on Android, and the second two are GNU Linux based applications. So let's start. I'm going
|
||
|
|
to do this in reverse order of how much I like and use them. So the first app that I have on
|
||
|
|
my Android phone, and I am currently using a Google Nexus 4, although I do have some old HTC
|
||
|
|
desire Zs, or desire Zs, also known as G2s, that I've tested these on. And the first one is
|
||
|
|
Starmap. Now Starmap is unique amongst the four I'm going to talk about because it's proprietary,
|
||
|
|
and I think it came out on iOS or iOS first. I don't know that, but it doesn't feel like a lot
|
||
|
|
of Android apps that I have used. In particular, it seems very keen to extract money out of you
|
||
|
|
at every twist and turn. Although I think the basic app is actually free on Android, certainly.
|
||
|
|
Well, the reason I came across it is because I was teaching an astronomy class. It was first year
|
||
|
|
students at Glasgow University. And to get them engaged with astronomy, I thought, well,
|
||
|
|
let's get them using their phones. So I put up a challenge to them, find whatever app you can
|
||
|
|
in your phone, and they all had iPhones, as it turns out, these poor and poverty university
|
||
|
|
students, and well not all of them, but most of them are 20, 25, 30. And a lot of them came back
|
||
|
|
with the Starmap app, which was pretty good and available on Android for free. So I gave it a
|
||
|
|
look. Now, it's by a games developer, which shows, because it has absolutely gorgeous looking
|
||
|
|
graphics, and it looks beautiful, striking, milky way, and gradient filled backgrounds,
|
||
|
|
and you know, it just all looks just like, you know, like a computer game, and a gorgeous computer
|
||
|
|
game graphics. And that actually would also be by main criticism of it. It is all looks, and not
|
||
|
|
much substance, and to get more substance out of it, you have to pay money. So yes, it looks
|
||
|
|
lovely, and it has the wild factor, and if you hold it up against a patch, the night sky, it will
|
||
|
|
show you, you know, hold your phone up against the patch, the night sky, it will show you what's
|
||
|
|
there. Which is all good, but I feel done with rather too much fuss, which brings me on to the
|
||
|
|
second app, which is Google Sky, also I think called Google Skymap. Now, I think something to do
|
||
|
|
with the extension to the Google Earth desktop application, but in my mind, it really was the first
|
||
|
|
app on my first smartphone, which was a, a Google HTC G1, back when it first came out. It's
|
||
|
|
actually October 2008, it's a long time now, and I remember when I got my phone, the first app
|
||
|
|
that really made me go, wow, this is something I could never do before, and indeed I could show it
|
||
|
|
to other people. I think even the iPhone, my iPhone brethren were impressed by this, I don't know if
|
||
|
|
such a similar app was available on iPhones at the time. I don't recall exactly, but I remember
|
||
|
|
them being impressed and poking away to see if they could get something up the app store,
|
||
|
|
and their phones. Anyway, it's Google Sky, and it is now, I think, open sourced in a patchy
|
||
|
|
two license, and really what it does, it does one thing, does it very well, you hold your phone up,
|
||
|
|
and it will show you what is present in the next guy. An unlike start-up, it has very basic
|
||
|
|
graphics, but it has all the things I would want in it, all the objects you can see with the
|
||
|
|
naked eye are there, the planets are labeled, and you've got enough menus and options to cover
|
||
|
|
all my basic ones. The only thing is, and I don't remember this being a problem with my G1,
|
||
|
|
but it seemed to be a problem with more modern phones, and it could be in my imagination, maybe my
|
||
|
|
expectations have risen, is that it does seem to trigger about, so you hold up the phone against
|
||
|
|
the night sky, and it will show you the stars and the constellations, etc, that are there, but
|
||
|
|
it seems to just jitter about in the screen, with backwards and forwards in the screen, quite sensitive
|
||
|
|
as if it's amplifying, just letting natural emotions in your hand, and I don't remember that
|
||
|
|
being a problem with my own G1, but maybe it's because accelerometers and phones have become more
|
||
|
|
sensitive, could be, or maybe it's my memory, maybe my expectations as I say are raised.
|
||
|
|
So I would really recommend that it's available on Google Play, or you can get it through
|
||
|
|
F-Droid, and the latter is generally my preference, although if you get it through F-Droid,
|
||
|
|
sees on location, finding services provided through Google are removed, and there's a bit of a
|
||
|
|
warning about that, although I haven't encountered a problem as far as I know, but then I haven't
|
||
|
|
really travelled about it, I'm just using it at home, so my phone probably isn't too bothered
|
||
|
|
about it, but I might have gone a few ways in order to spin, how difficult is it really to look
|
||
|
|
up along a given latitude of another place, if that's what you have to do. It's slightly annoying,
|
||
|
|
but I don't think it's a major deal, so go with the version of that on F-Droid if you can.
|
||
|
|
And that brings me on to the apps available for GNU Linux, and when I say GNU Linux, I guess,
|
||
|
|
technically these apps are available on other platforms, because I haven't tested them in
|
||
|
|
anything other than GNU Linux, and the first one I'd like to review is K-Stars. Now K-Stars was
|
||
|
|
the one recommended to me by Nyandru Geek, although I have actually looked at it before
|
||
|
|
because it comes with KDE, and KDE is the desktop that I use with Slackware on my day-to-day laptop,
|
||
|
|
so I have used K-Stars before, and I think one occasion, because it was just present on my laptop,
|
||
|
|
and I hadn't installed anything else, I just used it with a class I was teaching. Now I am privileged
|
||
|
|
in that people actually pay me to do astronomy, and one of the things I do is, or one of the things
|
||
|
|
I like to do are evening classes, and so I need to be able to show people on a screen, your laptop,
|
||
|
|
connector projector, project up into a screen, I need to be able to show them what's up in the
|
||
|
|
night sky. As K-Stars does the job, it's not pretty, but there's nothing, there's no problem with
|
||
|
|
it either, it works really well, and as I say it comes in the default software compilation of KDE,
|
||
|
|
so just as they are at the box for me, I don't often install anything when I'm using my Slackware
|
||
|
|
laptop, and it shows you what's in the night sky, you can turn on things like the Eclipse Tick,
|
||
|
|
which is the line across the sky where you'll find the sun, the moon, and the planets,
|
||
|
|
technically the sun should always be on the Eclipse Tick, the moon can be a little bit off it,
|
||
|
|
but you know for, to give you an example, it shows to be Eclipse Tick, where these objects would be
|
||
|
|
found in it, of course it shows, and labels the planets as well, and the sun and the moon etc,
|
||
|
|
and you can turn this on and off, and as a security application you can configure it through your
|
||
|
|
blue in the face. So I haven't, I have to say used K-Stars too much, so I can't comment on
|
||
|
|
its in depth features, but I noticed it did offer to download an extra pile of star catalog goodies
|
||
|
|
on its first run, and I didn't look too much into what that involved, but I thought that was nice,
|
||
|
|
it gives you the option of just on use it, or I want the in depth stuff, like that, that's a good
|
||
|
|
option to have up front, and I noticed that it had a plethora of options for displaying information
|
||
|
|
pages from various sources on the internet, so you could view images, view further information,
|
||
|
|
link to observing pages, all kinds of things, I mean it just was superb. I don't know if K-Stars has
|
||
|
|
been updated all that much in recent years, but that isn't, as I've learned, a system of software,
|
||
|
|
if it's reached a stable state, and frankly the night's guy, most of it isn't changing very much,
|
||
|
|
and will the bits that do change that are largely predictable out of the motions of the planets,
|
||
|
|
then that's not a bad thing, I presume it's got plugins so you can put in satellites and
|
||
|
|
comments that have only recently been discovered, but I haven't looked, but as I say, K-Stars is
|
||
|
|
a fully featured grade, a GPL licensed planetarium software, and it brings me to my final
|
||
|
|
piece of software, which is Stellarium, which to me is the bees knees, it's the Stellarium
|
||
|
|
package that I would use, it's available on Grool and Exx, it's available on Mac, OS10s,
|
||
|
|
available on Windows, and I've used it on all of these platforms, and it's just grade,
|
||
|
|
and it's got a beautiful user interface that keeps up your way, it's got excellent keyword shortcuts,
|
||
|
|
and it looked pretty as well, actually, and it's a nice understated sort of a way.
|
||
|
|
Now, I use Stellarium in two different ways, I use at my desktop, as I mentioned,
|
||
|
|
projected up into a screen, and for that, I do tend to use the gray interface that comes with it,
|
||
|
|
and I think I like about this interface, and I believe there's a number of different interfaces
|
||
|
|
you can get, but the one I use is the one where it slides out the way into the bottom left
|
||
|
|
and the bottom left of the screen, and there's two panels, one that comes in from the left side
|
||
|
|
of the screen, and the other one that comes in from the bottom of the screen, oh, and you put the
|
||
|
|
mouse down there, these slide gently into view, and they're really quite understated and faintly
|
||
|
|
drawn, but not so faint that you can't see it, but this is what you want in a darkened room, you don't
|
||
|
|
want a bright white window dazzling everybody, and also what would mean is that it's used
|
||
|
|
for actually, in real night sky conditions, where your dark adapted your eyes are used to the dark,
|
||
|
|
again you want a nice black background, and as dim as possible foreground displays,
|
||
|
|
and out the box, still the game delivers that for me,
|
||
|
|
as I see these gooey controls are very easy to use, but when I'm in the planetarium, the real planetarium,
|
||
|
|
that is a darkened room with a dome ceiling, and the one I use that's in the observatory down the road
|
||
|
|
from my house where I give classes, actually the dome ceiling is a giant umbrella, when I say
|
||
|
|
giant umbrella, I mean a 5 meter diameter job hung from the ceiling, full of spokes and stretched
|
||
|
|
fabric in between, and it hangs from the ceiling by another old looking rope, so I do caution
|
||
|
|
my guests in the planetarium that is in principle possible for the sky to fall in them, but
|
||
|
|
as never happened yet, and when the sky has a big spoke sticking out of it, yeah you don't want
|
||
|
|
that to happen, anyway, so the setup in there is that you have a computer projector,
|
||
|
|
and it's mounted quite high, so it's sitting about six feet off the ground and especially
|
||
|
|
constructed stand, and it is connected to, it's a normal computer projector I should add,
|
||
|
|
and it's connected to a laptop, which is an ancient MacBook, not my choice, but that's what was
|
||
|
|
provided, and on that is an ancient version of Stellarium, is it 0.4, maybe it is well with
|
||
|
|
8 enemy, but that's what's on it, and an important bit is that the projector projects in a completely
|
||
|
|
normal way, but not on to a screen, but on to this curved mirror, and it's like a convex
|
||
|
|
mirror that's a couple of feet across, if you imagine like it being like a quarter of a rug
|
||
|
|
people, that's what it looks like, and then when the reflection of this is reflected up
|
||
|
|
onto the inside of this giant umbrella, which is going to be the sky, and you get this image
|
||
|
|
of the next sky projected up, and now the first thing to say about that is that the view just above
|
||
|
|
the mirror is pretty poor, but the rest of the night sky is okay, quite usable, I have to say
|
||
|
|
that the quality of the night sky is nowhere near as good as the old-fashioned type of projector,
|
||
|
|
no, we used to have one in the observatory where it was on mechanical, and it was a ball with
|
||
|
|
the like pinpricks where all the stars were, well professionally machine drill pricks if you like,
|
||
|
|
holes, and there was just a lamp inside, a very bright lamp that ensured you got nice sharp
|
||
|
|
star images, now that produced a more realistic and a better view of the night sky, and I loved
|
||
|
|
operating the old-fashioned, you had six knobs in front of you, a couple of switches in that
|
||
|
|
was it, but you could dim the sky down, you could have a bit of red glow at one side and you could
|
||
|
|
stop and start things with like a switch, I appreciated the minimal simplicity and the mechanical
|
||
|
|
elegance that went into it and see the engineer dismantle it, but you can't do an awful lot with
|
||
|
|
it, and with this new setup, although with the projector you get this nice night sky, it is
|
||
|
|
aesthetically not quite as nice, but as I say you can do a lot more with it because you've got the
|
||
|
|
whole power of Stellarium under your belt, now the first thing is, is that when you're operating
|
||
|
|
the planetarium, you're in the pitch, in the pitch black, you can't even allow the back of a
|
||
|
|
backlit keyboard, that's too bright, so you have to do things by touch, I'm not a great touch
|
||
|
|
typist, and it's not like touch typing, but Stellarium is good because it is all operable via
|
||
|
|
keyboard shortcuts, which is what you want, unfortunately in the dark, when an alien keyboard
|
||
|
|
in the MacBook, which is particularly alien to me, it's quite hard to find your way around,
|
||
|
|
so I do have a little red torch on a hand to show you in the keyboard, briefly if I can't find the
|
||
|
|
key, and it's occasional giggles where I hit the wrong key and something bizarre happens,
|
||
|
|
like I said I've seen Jupiter, they get a constellation or appearing all over the sky,
|
||
|
|
or they get transported to the wrong place in Earth, something like that, it does occasionally
|
||
|
|
happen, but you know I usually have a bit of a laugh with the audience about it when that does happen,
|
||
|
|
but with Stellarium you can do a number of really quite cool things, I mean my favourite thing to
|
||
|
|
do, and this does bring in audible gasps when I do it, people have not seen it before,
|
||
|
|
is that for example I show them, let's say a Ryan, and they can see a Ryan's belt underneath the
|
||
|
|
belt in the planetarium display projected up, they can see this Ryan Nebula little fuzzy patch,
|
||
|
|
and I can click in that, and then I hit, I think it's the forward slash key, and then that
|
||
|
|
causes you to zoom in, but not only zoom in, it will then move Ryan Nebula to the zest, the point
|
||
|
|
directly above your head, zoom right into it, and a nice smooth zooming action, and you zoom right
|
||
|
|
into a beautiful big telescope, long exposure picture of the Ryan Nebula with all the colours,
|
||
|
|
and it fills up the top portion of the dome, the zenith, that's the zenith, the zenith is the point
|
||
|
|
we're right above your head, and the altitude of 90 degrees, technical astronomy speak,
|
||
|
|
incidentally people often use the word Nadir in everyday language, but an astronomy Nadir means
|
||
|
|
the opposite, it means the point directly below the zenith, directly below your feet, the point
|
||
|
|
which is least observable, you'd have to drill a hole all the way right through the earth to be
|
||
|
|
able to observe something in the Nadir, anyway, I digress, this picture of the Ryan Nebula above
|
||
|
|
people's heads doesn't fail to get a gasp if they've not seen it before, it is quite impressive,
|
||
|
|
and then you can do the same with Jupiter, and the positions of the moons will be visible,
|
||
|
|
and when you're finished you press, I think it's the backspace key, which is located in a
|
||
|
|
weird position in a mat keyboard, and you'll zoom back out again to where you were, which is really
|
||
|
|
handy because you can pick up where you're left off, and you can do all kinds of other things,
|
||
|
|
you can speed up, slow down time, reverse time, set time, move, latitudes go to the North Pole,
|
||
|
|
North Pole's always fun because the insured and the sun is just trundling along above the horizon,
|
||
|
|
not getting much higher or lower as the day goes by, and certainly not rising in setting,
|
||
|
|
that's another favourite, and then you can demonstrate like you go to the equator, and demonstrate
|
||
|
|
that the equator, that the sun, especially like the equinoxes in the 21st of March and 21st of
|
||
|
|
September, the equinoxes sunrise, the sun comes straight up, 92 degrees up from Eastern point
|
||
|
|
with the horizon, passes right through the zenith, there's zenith again, you know what that is now,
|
||
|
|
and then we'll set down in the Western, not Western, but in due west on the equinox,
|
||
|
|
and it comes vertically down and disappears below the horizon, and so sunset and sunrise
|
||
|
|
are over very quickly at the equator compared to a high latitude like Glasgow where I am,
|
||
|
|
which is 56 degrees north, and Stellarium is really well set up for this, now I think there's a
|
||
|
|
planetary mode you put Stellarium into, although I can't comment on how you do that because I never
|
||
|
|
said to upwards, the very good technician at Glasgow University Observatory who looks after that.
|
||
|
|
Anyway, so Stellarium is a great piece of software, whether in a real planetarium or in the
|
||
|
|
desktop, the other thing I should mention about it is that you can put in various other objects,
|
||
|
|
so when we had comment eyes on last year and comment pan stars just over a year ago,
|
||
|
|
greater skies, that wasn't by default loaded into the list of objects in Stellarium's database
|
||
|
|
because when the last release took place, nobody had discovered those comments yet, let alone realize
|
||
|
|
there were going to be, well, actually neither of them turned up to be that visually exciting
|
||
|
|
in the real night sky, although they could have been, but the point is that Stellarium didn't include
|
||
|
|
them, but it's not too difficult in Stellarium to add in these objects. Now, I'm not going to attempt
|
||
|
|
to describe the details of how you would do that, but I think in the show notes, I'll provide you
|
||
|
|
a link of how to, like, the grocery how to add a comment in, so that if comment super-duper,
|
||
|
|
wonderful seven appears and promises a spectacular view, promises it to be a spectacle in a night
|
||
|
|
sky later in the year that you can go and add it in yourself and find out exactly where to look
|
||
|
|
and prepare yourself for the ultimate disappointment, which is any almost every
|
||
|
|
spectacular comment, or meet your shower that is predicted. Well, not everyone, no, I'm exaggerating,
|
||
|
|
there are some, been some real corkers of comments in my lifetime, comment, hillbop, comment,
|
||
|
|
hike, tacky, to need a book to. Anyway, so that's my roundup. Now, apologies if you feel I've given
|
||
|
|
to Boroughland and its expression short shrift to the other applications, in particular case to
|
||
|
|
ours, that's really because I use Stellarium more than anything else. Another piece of software
|
||
|
|
which I'll probably come back to in a future episode is Celestea, which lets you leave the
|
||
|
|
surf to the earth and fly around through space in a very scientific and accurate and mind-bogglingly
|
||
|
|
confusing 3D sort of a way. I think I will talk about that in the future, but I think that's
|
||
|
|
enough for this episode. So thank you very much for listening and thank you to the good folks
|
||
|
|
at HPR and its community for allowing me to be a part of it and providing so many other podcasts
|
||
|
|
that I've enjoyed. Thank you very much for listening and please do let me know if you've got any
|
||
|
|
feedback on the website or wherever it is, see you prefer to leave feedback. Thank you very much.
|
||
|
|
Bye-bye.
|
||
|
|
You have been listening to Hacker Public Radio at Hacker Public Radio.
|
||
|
|
We are a community podcast network that releases shows every weekday and Monday through Friday.
|
||
|
|
Today's show, like all our shows, was contributed by a HPR listener like yourself.
|
||
|
|
If you ever consider recording a podcast, then visit our website to find out how easy it really is.
|
||
|
|
Hacker Public Radio was founded by the digital dog pound and the infonomicum computer club.
|
||
|
|
HPR is funded by the binary revolution at binref.com. All binref projects are crowd-responsive
|
||
|
|
by linear pages. From shared hosting to custom private clouds, go to lunarpages.com for all your
|
||
|
|
hosting needs. Unless otherwise stasis, today's show is released under a creative comments,
|
||
|
|
attribution, share a life, lead us our lives.
|