296 lines
23 KiB
Plaintext
296 lines
23 KiB
Plaintext
|
|
Episode: 1044
|
||
|
|
Title: HPR1044: OggCamp11: Oracle Linux
|
||
|
|
Source: https://hub.hackerpublicradio.org/ccdn.php?filename=/eps/hpr1044/hpr1044.mp3
|
||
|
|
Transcribed: 2025-10-17 17:53:23
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
---
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
I'm talking to JWP, one of our own hosts, and you've just come out of a talk given by
|
||
|
|
yourself, Coles.
|
||
|
|
It's about Oracle Linux, so how did that go down?
|
||
|
|
It went pretty well, I stuttered a lot, and so it's, I don't know if it was really good
|
||
|
|
or not, but we had a lot of questions, and there were some red hat people there that really
|
||
|
|
like red hat and lots of interaction, lots of interaction with Oracle, I hate it and
|
||
|
|
everything.
|
||
|
|
Well, that's, I'm looking forward to seeing the talks, because I'm don't here, I'm
|
||
|
|
not getting to see any of the talks at all, so they will be available on a separate
|
||
|
|
feed.
|
||
|
|
Okay, Ken, you should really talk about this, this is a really interesting device, you're
|
||
|
|
diverting the attention from yourself, so what topics did you cover in the interview?
|
||
|
|
What did you cover in the talk?
|
||
|
|
Well, about, you know, is it evil, did they break the GPL, did, where they're going
|
||
|
|
to go in three years, will it really matter about any kind of database in five years, things
|
||
|
|
like that?
|
||
|
|
Cool.
|
||
|
|
We're probably going to talk on the talk to the end of this episode.
|
||
|
|
Okay, great.
|
||
|
|
Alrighty, enjoy the show.
|
||
|
|
Hello everyone, I'm John and I'm here to kind of talk about the Oracle and it's, you
|
||
|
|
know, we've all heard of an evil thing that's come out, you know, it's a lot of access,
|
||
|
|
quite evil, everything that Oracle does, but actually, it wasn't such an evil move if
|
||
|
|
you really look at it, why?
|
||
|
|
So what is it really, it's exactly like you heard on the podcast, it's just a copy
|
||
|
|
of what it had.
|
||
|
|
In the moment, the reason that they did it was, Oracle owns an 85% share of the UNIX
|
||
|
|
database environment on proprietary UNIX system risk, AIX, HPX, some of the data-based
|
||
|
|
choice.
|
||
|
|
And it's no different on Linux, with Red Hat or Nobel, whatever they call the catch
|
||
|
|
main now, it's still 85%, so even though they went to X86 and they get a migration
|
||
|
|
now, there was a guy with a Hilti bag running around here, Hilti did a great migration,
|
||
|
|
took them about three years to get the payoff from the migration from the proprietary UNIX
|
||
|
|
stuff.
|
||
|
|
And the other reason they did it was because now they bought some, so some sells X86 servers,
|
||
|
|
so they control the whole stack, so they get the whole support line, and by the way,
|
||
|
|
they didn't have to develop, they can give support for 50% less than that, but you have
|
||
|
|
to buy the whole thing from you.
|
||
|
|
They're not, later as we talk, you'll see that they don't do, if you don't want part
|
||
|
|
of it, they're not really interested, they don't like it all or nothing.
|
||
|
|
In the enterprise space, especially with ERP and SAP, to a certain extent, people saw
|
||
|
|
that they're going to be, they had, for sure they're going to be, sless, they're cheaper
|
||
|
|
with that unbreakable kernel on the application side, I think it's 60% better benchmark performance,
|
||
|
|
so then the standard Red Hat kernel.
|
||
|
|
It's not really, the only thing with that is I say it's unbreakable, but when we benchmarked
|
||
|
|
it in my workplace, it crashes a lot, so you have to have a bunch of them to keep it
|
||
|
|
going.
|
||
|
|
Oracle also brings a lot to the table that in the moment that Red Hat and I'll just say
|
||
|
|
Sousa, now that I've found the right word, Sousa don't have, like they have ASM, storage
|
||
|
|
manager, they have Oracle DataGuard, it goes on for text, makes a copy of the database
|
||
|
|
over a long distance, and currently the cluster inside the Red Hat is just not enough reference
|
||
|
|
assistance, for an enterprise people, if you have 500 people working on your environment
|
||
|
|
and you have a database of, it can't be done because you're paying those people whatever
|
||
|
|
hourly that personnel cost is, plus whatever the customer says, so it can't be done at all,
|
||
|
|
especially if there's supply chain management systems, it just can't be.
|
||
|
|
And so it's going to be probably, when I talk to Red Hat, they said it probably in two
|
||
|
|
or three years, this problem will go away.
|
||
|
|
And it's more or less about references, like Hilti is their reference that they do
|
||
|
|
is when they usually visit people in Europe.
|
||
|
|
Oracle is going to have some real trouble with this, is that more and more companies are
|
||
|
|
making strategic decisions about their technology, right?
|
||
|
|
Like, for instance, who their storage provider can be, who their outsourcing partners can
|
||
|
|
be.
|
||
|
|
They make that choice up front, right?
|
||
|
|
This is, we're going to have Red Hat, right?
|
||
|
|
And, or we're going to have PMC or NetApp or HP or IBM Storage, and that's what we're
|
||
|
|
going to use for the next six years.
|
||
|
|
And when customers have made that choice, Oracle doesn't win, they don't have the choice,
|
||
|
|
the choice really, it's about, like, after that.
|
||
|
|
But in all other cases, where there's a unit and a database and a migration, Oracle
|
||
|
|
is quite strong.
|
||
|
|
As an example of this mix that I was talking about, well, you said your SAP server, and
|
||
|
|
when you sell it, you say, well, Oracle's support is 50% cheaper than Red Hat, but it's
|
||
|
|
only supported if you buy the database and the clustering software, right?
|
||
|
|
Because they won't support Oracle Linux on the application server.
|
||
|
|
So, almost every customer that I sold to for the last three or four years, they buy
|
||
|
|
cheap eight Intel or AMD boxes and scale it now.
|
||
|
|
So they won't pay $500,000 for a proprietary unit system anymore, though, but by a bunch
|
||
|
|
of little labels and do it that way.
|
||
|
|
Or two or three really big eight socket Intel boxes and do it that way.
|
||
|
|
But for sure, for sure, they're not going to give you $1.2 million for application
|
||
|
|
server, as it's not going to happen.
|
||
|
|
And so, Oracle won't support that.
|
||
|
|
So Red Hat has the chance, and Nobel has the chance to sell the low-hanging fruit more
|
||
|
|
or less and get into the customer that way with that.
|
||
|
|
Oracle is in a lot of work with Zen, they're a virtual machine that they sell in the enterprise
|
||
|
|
space, so they pay to Linux Foundation some money to put the hooks back in to the kernel
|
||
|
|
for Zen.
|
||
|
|
Somehow, their Oracle VM, when we're in the bench test, is much faster than VMware.
|
||
|
|
Much faster than almost anything else we've ever seen.
|
||
|
|
So it's really, really tuned, and I have to add that Oracle will send people to your
|
||
|
|
place and help you set up all that if you want to do that, so that are real interested
|
||
|
|
in being with boxes.
|
||
|
|
Of course, there's a lot of restrictions, and when I say the restrictions, so okay, they
|
||
|
|
have that great benchmark, and if you buy their Linux and have their database, you can use
|
||
|
|
their virtual desk technology.
|
||
|
|
But if you want to use their database with VMware or Zen, just playing from another provider
|
||
|
|
to get your support from your place else, or KVM, it's Dragonia, what they make you
|
||
|
|
out there.
|
||
|
|
It supports steps, and you can't install it, you can't do anything, it's just not supported.
|
||
|
|
I did sort of evil with the Linux space, and they're not interested in the desktop space
|
||
|
|
at all, as they gave away an open office thing.
|
||
|
|
We all heard about that, that was sort of poorly handled with the open office.
|
||
|
|
They've been pretty hard with Google, with the Java thing, and the Android.
|
||
|
|
I don't know if you all read about that, that was pretty stressful.
|
||
|
|
What's going to happen?
|
||
|
|
I have an entourage, an e-quant on one side, and Android tablet on the other side of
|
||
|
|
the Android, and I was quite concerned when they did the Java announcement, MySQL, lots
|
||
|
|
of people use that on the web now, and that's all owned by them now.
|
||
|
|
It's really, really stressful.
|
||
|
|
From my company, data cleared are HPUX, non-supportable, so all of our 20,000 HPUX Oracle
|
||
|
|
database customers have to move now, tell you, a new solution, I just arbitrarily killed
|
||
|
|
that, right?
|
||
|
|
The only real space where it's been really interesting is that with SAP, most of the mid-level managers
|
||
|
|
in Germany there, doing project development there, when they went to school, they used
|
||
|
|
Sousa, and so that's the development environment there, and so all the Linux appliances, their
|
||
|
|
business intelligence, this new Anna thing that they're doing, all of the client structures
|
||
|
|
from there.
|
||
|
|
It only runs on the Novel product.
|
||
|
|
Now, as I said before, Red Hat in the moment is really struggling with the cluster, but
|
||
|
|
in January, they brought out new cluster software, and it's finally a three-disset when you
|
||
|
|
put it into the server, so your integrator can want to three, put it in with no trouble.
|
||
|
|
But at the same time, Red Hat has a problem that people, though by two or three support licenses,
|
||
|
|
there's minimal support from them, but then they have 20 servers that run the Red Hat on
|
||
|
|
it.
|
||
|
|
You can't get a full representation of how many exactly Sousa and Novel have, because
|
||
|
|
it's very easy to clone the applications.
|
||
|
|
And so, if there is a problem, they call it the vendor and say, hey, I've got this problem.
|
||
|
|
And that's another problem, is that if you're a customer and you have a storage vendor,
|
||
|
|
server vendor, an operating system vendor, and a database vendor, and a guy that's doing
|
||
|
|
backup software, and something goes wrong, you get a lot of deaths.
|
||
|
|
And so, it's quite, with Oracle, they say, well, when we sold to the server, we sold
|
||
|
|
to the database, we sold to the high availability stuff, everything's good, we'll make it right.
|
||
|
|
But if you mix it, it's quite hard, and there's a lot of finger pointing.
|
||
|
|
So, the, what, you know, how did the market react, right, what were the initial market reactions,
|
||
|
|
right, how did they do it, right, well, okay, so, you know, the big, among the thing that
|
||
|
|
is HP got scared, because their whole infrastructure just got, it has a five-year shelf life now.
|
||
|
|
And so, what happened, the, you know, the CEO of the company, he's from SAP, some Leo's
|
||
|
|
there, and Leo called SAP, I guess, and SAP bought Sybase, and Sybase has a database company,
|
||
|
|
they're not really exciting, I mean, but they had some in-memory technology that's pretty
|
||
|
|
fantastic, and it only runs on Linux, but that's all right, there won't be any Microsoft
|
||
|
|
or any kind of anything else, and their mobility products for the phones have an in-phone
|
||
|
|
database, and I don't know if you've seen this thing yet, it's a touchpad, it's a polymer
|
||
|
|
less, well, that's Linux too, right, and so, there's going to be an interface, so if you're
|
||
|
|
out selling your beer salesman, everybody drinks beer here, your beer salesman, he pulled
|
||
|
|
up in his truck, I live in Germany, he pulled up in the truck, and he comes out, and he has
|
||
|
|
a little pad, and I buy beer, all right, it comes in, well, that automatically goes into
|
||
|
|
the ERP system now, and they know exactly what kind of beer is on teeth and talk straws
|
||
|
|
and is needed, and he'll only have that beer in his truck next time, not beer for everybody.
|
||
|
|
And so, that's what these are going to do, you always see these tablets, but they're
|
||
|
|
really going to come, and now, your doctor, well, he's going to have one of these two,
|
||
|
|
all right, it's all going to be home on those, it's not going to be, yeah, this paper thing
|
||
|
|
will exist anymore in the doctor's office, because you've been going to be out for over
|
||
|
|
a year, he's going to have one of those for you, all right, and flip, maybe even you'll
|
||
|
|
have a chip that runs Linux, and you give it to the hospital when you go buy a hospital
|
||
|
|
I got no idea, but the, so, in response, SAP is going to have this memory database technology,
|
||
|
|
so in three to four years, we won't even think about it, what people will be saying is,
|
||
|
|
memory is much faster, I'm running the inside of the machine, and I'm running running,
|
||
|
|
so it's not going to cost me any money, and so I really don't know what the future is,
|
||
|
|
it's really as clear as money on this, and it changes radically from month to month,
|
||
|
|
if you read the support notes that come from all three companies on what they support
|
||
|
|
and how this is going to happen, what they're doing, it's, I've never seen it, it's like
|
||
|
|
almost like some kind of mutation movie, all right, well, that pretty much does it for
|
||
|
|
me, I've got about 11 minutes left, and 11 minutes left, I didn't think I'd take the
|
||
|
|
old 30 minutes, so, did anybody got anything? Oh, no, I forgot, oh, I got it, oh, I got it,
|
||
|
|
thank you guys, so you mentioned the opening, obviously, it's possible to purchase Red Hat
|
||
|
|
support from Oracle, how do Oracle adequately provide support for something that they haven't
|
||
|
|
already developed? It's a wonderful thing called India, all right, so the Oracle has one
|
||
|
|
of the biggest support structures in the world, so it's really easy, they hire people, they
|
||
|
|
look for the Red Hat certification, they hire you, you get on the phone, you go out, and
|
||
|
|
that's a real problem that Red Hat has actually, right? Try selling Red Hat in Israel, or
|
||
|
|
Saudi Arabia, or Kuwait, I work in India, so I have all those places, and you know, I always have to
|
||
|
|
say, you know, you better call up, you know, Red Hat or Nobel, or whoever you're buying yourself
|
||
|
|
from, and be sure they got somebody here, you know, that can come out and help you, and they're like,
|
||
|
|
don't you, as Harvard member has somebody, and I'm like, it's only up to level two, so level three
|
||
|
|
support comes from the Linux, India. But in terms of, so they say, I'll have a problem with my
|
||
|
|
Oracle system, I find out that's all right, okay, there's a bug in this particular place,
|
||
|
|
it's off of you shit, how does that bug make it through the Oracle system, and then end up
|
||
|
|
as a fix, oh, for my particular setup, did I have any developers, or are they just...
|
||
|
|
Yeah, they'll fix it, they'll send somebody to your place, you'll look at the problem,
|
||
|
|
I know, they'll fix it. They'll send somebody out to my place to fix the problem.
|
||
|
|
That's the way it works. For an exorbitant fee, presumably, it is.
|
||
|
|
It is. I mean, once you look at that support contract, right, how does that fix,
|
||
|
|
then make it back into every other customer, so I'll end up running a bespoke version of Oracle
|
||
|
|
loads. In other words, it won't go back into the community here.
|
||
|
|
Right, all right, I'm working finance, so that wouldn't really fly in my environment.
|
||
|
|
Yeah, well, it wouldn't work, I mean, it might make it back into the Oracle tree,
|
||
|
|
yeah, right, but as far as I'm giving it back, I don't think you're going to be there.
|
||
|
|
I mean, maybe there were impactures, I don't know, I haven't seen anything, really, really.
|
||
|
|
But that's the interesting thing, because I, that's my Oracle book short after I was released,
|
||
|
|
and there was no real roadmap for any, any communication between them or that type of stuff,
|
||
|
|
so you know, I thought I could just, would you say the Oracle would write out a five-inched,
|
||
|
|
again, to continue that version until... Well, they're talking about a fork,
|
||
|
|
a fork of the, you know, that they were going to have their own fork, but then, you know,
|
||
|
|
I read the note from SAP that Oracle's going to have a 6.0 clock coming out, you know, in two or three weeks.
|
||
|
|
So they might even beat Red Hat to certification of the, of the clock, right?
|
||
|
|
And so it's, it's, you know, in, of course, with the certification inside the ERP space,
|
||
|
|
Oracle controls that, because they have the database, so it's, it's quite a, it's quite an interesting,
|
||
|
|
anybody got anything else? Yeah, with the patchy thing, because the, is interesting, I think, is,
|
||
|
|
I'm sorry? With the patchy industry, yeah, which is quite a bit too much, because I think it's like
|
||
|
|
him, I like to find out, and when Oracle came in to ask me to have Oracle Red Hat and some other
|
||
|
|
monkey coming in to try and looking at how much stuff would cost. We've got Red Hat everywhere,
|
||
|
|
we've got fascists. And Oracle has seen the figures as whole that, oh, yeah, yeah, yeah, if you
|
||
|
|
have a problem with that, it would just come in and patch it, or they think they've seen the thing,
|
||
|
|
that's brilliant one, and we were like, huh, by the way, it's the best thing to do, because like,
|
||
|
|
no interest in that. It's like, it sounds good. You come in and say, oh, yeah, we've patched
|
||
|
|
that, fix a few in my bed for ladies, desolated, so it's fully ours, you know, it's only two hours
|
||
|
|
or so. But, um, we don't have a year, but we need, we need this stuff to be flowing to
|
||
|
|
slowly, because system, we don't want to have a golden tree, you know, effectively in our bank,
|
||
|
|
we shouldn't have to just be out of the gold, it doesn't work, it goes over, doing that, you
|
||
|
|
need to do something about that, but the way you're talking about doing it, that's, there's no
|
||
|
|
way that can be achieved, and then you have a golden tree for bank xyz, which, and it took
|
||
|
|
it kind of on board, oh yeah, we couldn't have done that alone, whatever, that's the only way,
|
||
|
|
it's a world, we don't, from a bank you want to do, we don't really care, that's all,
|
||
|
|
I think it goes back to the community, that's a trouble, it's true, but what we do care is that
|
||
|
|
the bank itself, around the world, that's the same. Right.
|
||
|
|
I saw a hand, oh yeah, so, you mentioned undercutting a red hat by 50% in the
|
||
|
|
in-tip for the full disclosure, I should mention undercut the red hat, one of the things that red
|
||
|
|
hats executives have constantly said to the market is that they've taken an industry with 10 billion
|
||
|
|
dollars and reduced it to one worth this year, one million dollars, that's the way that they
|
||
|
|
delivered value to CEOs by lowering the costs of producing and supporting the operating system,
|
||
|
|
so one of the things I really wonder with Oracle is, as far as the long-term plan goes,
|
||
|
|
if the aim is to undercut, how is that then sustainable? You can reduce and we all, in this
|
||
|
|
room, properly understand that open source can do more with less, by engaging the power in the
|
||
|
|
community, but there's a limit on that. It seems that currently, Oracle is in a position to
|
||
|
|
subsidise the Linux division from the database division, and that's something here from fields
|
||
|
|
by the database, have the OS for free. How is that long-term sustainable, and where does it lead
|
||
|
|
the community in 10 years, 15 years time? What's to stop a vendor in a position to do the hat,
|
||
|
|
owning the market, and then increasing prices on every window once they've achieved that don't
|
||
|
|
want to petition? Well, I mean, the profit on the database is 90 percent, right, and they've
|
||
|
|
had technology for years and years, and so that's a big cash thing, right, and so they bring you,
|
||
|
|
they don't want to talk to anybody, so they've had prints, and they don't want to talk to you,
|
||
|
|
and so they take your free cell, and they say, I've got a whole stack from the hardware,
|
||
|
|
from the hardware, you know, all the way up, right, and if I'm doing it at cost, that's a fantastic
|
||
|
|
thing to me, right, I'll break even on, right, and if I'm causing you grief because of it, that's
|
||
|
|
even better, and if I, if I piss everyone in the world off doing it, that's even better, right,
|
||
|
|
because I mean, I mean, I mean, the only more people more here are going to take more
|
||
|
|
air again when you talk to them than Oracle sells rub, there's a guy from IBM that's pushing power
|
||
|
|
seven, right, so, you know, if you get those two in the same room, my god, it's, it really only
|
||
|
|
works if they buy the whole thing, right, if they don't buy the whole thing, I mean, if they don't
|
||
|
|
buy it, the whole stack, they don't say, okay, I'm going to have to work on database, you know,
|
||
|
|
then it doesn't, then Oracle won't care, they're not going to sell links, they don't care
|
||
|
|
what you run your patch, you know, let me say that, but from where you have these discussions
|
||
|
|
with all systems, none of them at all, I don't care, so they were using their right to
|
||
|
|
get the whole thing as a gateway, like that, there's a wall mechanism getting into the bank,
|
||
|
|
so if we get those things going to support Red Hat, we'll be able to post it at the time.
|
||
|
|
They've been gaining anything out of it, up front, because we bought all the other,
|
||
|
|
we've all decided to get that, we bought all the Red Hat, so we had one position where
|
||
|
|
we have been with the rest of the earth, you know, we have a team we need, so they're
|
||
|
|
zero-sum game for them, it's not the front, they'll be sensible in the same way,
|
||
|
|
like those percent, they'll be able to support them, yeah, and further down as well,
|
||
|
|
so when you have to find a lot of things, they'll be able to get them out, so they don't
|
||
|
|
get that revenue through that, but it's, it's seen to be owed.
|
||
|
|
It's a, it's a, it's also a buy-in, right? It's also a buy-in, you know, if you buy, they're,
|
||
|
|
they're, they're, they're, they're Red Hat, you're also probably going to buy their
|
||
|
|
hike about your product, all right? And then you're taking the money from VMware.
|
||
|
|
I mean, I don't know, Zen has a great thing, but are not Zen, KVM is a fantastic thing.
|
||
|
|
Great benchmark, fantastic, Cisco did a fantastic benchmark within the other day, but
|
||
|
|
if you can take anything, if you can take 10% from VMware, it's, you know, it's worth the F,
|
||
|
|
you know, and that's, that, you know, it's, it's the complete picture. I mean, they, they took
|
||
|
|
Mark Herd away from us, and he, he's definitely had several magazine articles that said he wanted it
|
||
|
|
all, well now, Oracle wants it all too, you know? I just wish they were interested in the desktop,
|
||
|
|
but they weren't interested in the desktop, think about how great that could be. I mean, they can buy
|
||
|
|
economical. I mean, we actually said, you know, we can't deal with it, and so they should buy
|
||
|
|
that. Is it, is it Zen on my site, or Oracle bought that as well recently, and missed it?
|
||
|
|
Yeah, the packaging, the, well, it's, it's the derivative, correct me, if I'm wrong,
|
||
|
|
of the L5 Red Hat Zen. Right, right. So it's a bit more than a mystery. Yeah, but they paid,
|
||
|
|
they went to the Linux foundation again, when it's kind of the right form. They paid, it's not
|
||
|
|
your product, or something else. They're getting an open source product. The Zen is an open source,
|
||
|
|
and they have their own management tools. So the management suite is their own.
|
||
|
|
And if there's problems with that, do you buy it back up to Citrix as well? No, no. So you have
|
||
|
|
basically your own fork of that as well, exactly. Exactly. I missed the early part of your talk,
|
||
|
|
past this with cover for the House of GIF, it was the announcement by Red Hat, that they were going to be,
|
||
|
|
they weren't going to be packaging up the kernel, the, the, they're kind of patches.
|
||
|
|
So it's, it's not my medical technology. In return, in return, Oracle said that they weren't going to
|
||
|
|
certify Red Hat 60, that they paid. It's not a healthy ecosystem, it's a customer. They eat,
|
||
|
|
one of the other things we hear at Red Hat is, we don't want things, we don't want
|
||
|
|
the more genus systems. I've got it.
|
||
|
|
Hey guys, thank you very much for your time. I know, I hope I wasn't too warm. Thank you very much.
|
||
|
|
You have been listening to Hacker Public Radio, where Hacker Public Radio does our.
|
||
|
|
We are a community podcast network that releases shows every weekday on
|
||
|
|
day through Friday. Today's show, like all our shows, was contributed by an HBR listener like
|
||
|
|
yourself. If you ever consider recording a podcast, then visit our website to find out how easy it
|
||
|
|
really is. Hacker Public Radio was founded by the Digital Dog Pound and the Infonomicum
|
||
|
|
Computer Club. HBR is funded by the binary revolution at binref.com. All binref projects are
|
||
|
|
crowd-responsive by linear pages. From shared hosting to custom private clouds,
|
||
|
|
go to lunarpages.com for all your hosting needs. Unless otherwise stasis, today's show is
|
||
|
|
released under creative comments, attribution, share a life, lead us our license.
|