137 lines
12 KiB
Plaintext
137 lines
12 KiB
Plaintext
|
|
Episode: 2488
|
||
|
|
Title: HPR2488: Psychology of Love
|
||
|
|
Source: https://hub.hackerpublicradio.org/ccdn.php?filename=/eps/hpr2488/hpr2488.mp3
|
||
|
|
Transcribed: 2025-10-19 04:02:17
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
---
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
This is an HPR episode 2488 entitled Psychology of Love.
|
||
|
|
It is hosted by first time both RSA and in about 13 minutes long and Karim an exquisite flag.
|
||
|
|
The summary is a look at some of the neuroscience and psychology behind love.
|
||
|
|
This episode of HPR is brought to you by archive.org.
|
||
|
|
Support universal access to all knowledge by heading over to archive.org forward slash donate.
|
||
|
|
Support universal access to all knowledge by heading over to archive.org.
|
||
|
|
Hi, this episode of HPR is about the neuroscience and psychology behind love.
|
||
|
|
I'm RSA. I had a few different podcast episode ideas in my mind but when I saw that valentine
|
||
|
|
stay was approaching I thought I'll do a romantic interview to HPR.
|
||
|
|
To give you a bit of a background my main degree is in electronics engineering and I also have a
|
||
|
|
diploma in psychological counseling and guidance. Mainly I consider myself an interested amateur
|
||
|
|
in psychology and neuroscience. By the way my accent is pretty much transparent to me so if there are
|
||
|
|
particular phrases or words that I pronounce too differently and yeah it's okay to let me know.
|
||
|
|
Please let me know. Now let's dive into the neuroscience of love. First a bit of a disclaimer.
|
||
|
|
Sometimes people tend to think that describing the chemical reactions behind love means that you're
|
||
|
|
just reducing love to a chemical reaction. Like love is just a chemical reaction.
|
||
|
|
That's only as true as saying poem is just being on paper or your child is just a bunch of
|
||
|
|
subatomic particles. It sounds kind of profound but really it's basically meaningless in real life
|
||
|
|
unless you reduce every part of the universe to such simplistic use. With that said the main
|
||
|
|
neurochemicals involved in love are dopamine and oxygen and vasopressin which are similar to
|
||
|
|
each other. First dopamine. Dopamine is commonly associated with reward and pleasure might have
|
||
|
|
come across it in the context of addiction and it plays a major role there but dopamine's main
|
||
|
|
function is to let you know that you have done something evolutionarily good or that things
|
||
|
|
is good. Those little surges of pleasure you get from solving a puzzle or fixing a bug they
|
||
|
|
come mostly from dopamine and in the context of romantic love is just found that the dopamine
|
||
|
|
rich areas of the brain the reward centers of the brain light up and show activity when you're
|
||
|
|
reminded of your loved one through a photo through their voice. It seems that simply their
|
||
|
|
photo or a recollection of their memory is enough to give you a little surge of pleasure to
|
||
|
|
make you feel pleased to think about them and from an evolutionary perspective that makes sense
|
||
|
|
because your brain wants to be reproduced it wants you to pause on your genes and with humans
|
||
|
|
your partner your loved one is the way brain gets to do that. Dopamine is also the reason that
|
||
|
|
romantic love especially yang love often feels like an addiction like any other behavior that's
|
||
|
|
regulated by dopamine. This part of it also has the potential for addiction a kind of addiction
|
||
|
|
we'll come back to that. The other part the other neurochemical that's major involved in romantic love
|
||
|
|
is oxytocin. Oxytocin again has a popular name it's sometimes called the cuddle hormone or
|
||
|
|
the pounding hormone. This kind of names can be helpful but they can also be misleading if you're a
|
||
|
|
programmer think of the if keyword if people started calling the if keyword the error and
|
||
|
|
exception checking keyword if you think about it that kind of makes sense because many many use
|
||
|
|
of the if keyword if and else are for error checking and some basic exception handling but you
|
||
|
|
know that fundamentally they're very different things and similar to that the neurochemicals and
|
||
|
|
neurotransmitters in the brain have multiple functions they are basic elements in a very complex
|
||
|
|
and very interactive process so these only give you a vague generalized idea so oxytocin in particular
|
||
|
|
gets this name the pounding hormone because among other things it's involved in for example
|
||
|
|
trust empathy generosity and generally bonding with someone. Oxytocin basically gives your brain
|
||
|
|
a way to record this person is important to me on the flip side of it it also encourages
|
||
|
|
in-group mentality it increases the kind of us versus them mentality and it makes you think
|
||
|
|
or care less about people outside your group it increases the in-group bonding
|
||
|
|
but it decreases out-group empathy but in relation to romantic love there has been a finding
|
||
|
|
that oxytocin apparently increases your fidelity to your partner it's been found that a small
|
||
|
|
dose of oxytocin makes committed partners more distant and less interested in people of the
|
||
|
|
opposite sex whereas the same dose of oxytocin didn't do anything with single people so
|
||
|
|
apparently our brain deep inside knows about fidelity and regulates for it these and other parts
|
||
|
|
of brain chemistry also impact and explain some of our normal romantic interactions and issues
|
||
|
|
for example when you're infatuated with someone that kind of romantic interaction is mostly based
|
||
|
|
on dopamine it's based on this internal reward of pleasure and excitement that's what gets
|
||
|
|
your heart going but it also turns out that kind of passionate infatuated love also leads to
|
||
|
|
decrease in the areas of your brain that are related to mentalizing or creating a theory of mind
|
||
|
|
this mentalizing is what lets you understand that other people's thoughts and emotions are
|
||
|
|
distinct from yours and can go in different directions because these parts of the brain are
|
||
|
|
less active in infactuation on the one hand it gets the person feeling like them and their partner
|
||
|
|
are united as the same person around the flip side of it it also makes it more difficult for an
|
||
|
|
infatuated young person to make sense of and reconcile with the differences between them and their
|
||
|
|
partner a little bit of infatuation keeps the relationship passionate and exciting but allowing
|
||
|
|
that dominate your romantic feelings leads you to not really understanding the other person's mind
|
||
|
|
and truly creating a mature relationship on the other end of it there has also been some research
|
||
|
|
into so-called selfless love the kind of love practiced in some kinds of meditation the study
|
||
|
|
this kind of selfless love does not activate the reward centers of the brain as much as romantic
|
||
|
|
love does and so does not involve that dopamine rush and that feeling of addiction so when you see
|
||
|
|
a couple have been together for 30 or 40 years and still in love with each other most probably
|
||
|
|
they have discovered this kind of selfless love for each other while also maintaining a little
|
||
|
|
bit of passion through that little bit of infatuation the secret is in finding the right mixture
|
||
|
|
between infatuation and mentalizing and selfless love okay so far we have remained within the
|
||
|
|
realm of rigorous scientific studies now we are going to enter some debtary where things are less
|
||
|
|
rigorously study less rigorously known but things that have been very useful for many relationships
|
||
|
|
the first is something called the five love languages the five different ways in which people
|
||
|
|
express love and therefore the ways in which they expect to receive love the ways in which they
|
||
|
|
understand love the concept is from a book by Gary Chapman and he divides the languages
|
||
|
|
love into five categories they are all expressions of love but for different people different languages
|
||
|
|
speak more loudly so the languages he mentions are time words gifts actions in physical touch
|
||
|
|
so basically you can express your love to someone through spending a lot of time with them
|
||
|
|
giving them caring and affirmative words doing acts of service that make them more comfortable
|
||
|
|
that makes their lives better through physical intimacy like hugs and hurdles and of course sex
|
||
|
|
or by giving them valuable gifts the idea is that if you are a type of person who sees giving
|
||
|
|
your time to someone as your most valuable act of love and if your partner expresses and receives
|
||
|
|
love by giving and receiving gifts then if you don't understand this difference in your languages of
|
||
|
|
love neither of your affection for each other will be properly communicated when people understand
|
||
|
|
and adjust for the other person's language of love that leads to better relationship and a more
|
||
|
|
long-lived relationship that's one aspect of communication in a relationship there's another
|
||
|
|
access along which people have divided communication relationship a kind based on experience rather than
|
||
|
|
rigorous studies this is the ask culture versus the guess culture this can be a culture in terms
|
||
|
|
of actual nationalities different cultures or in terms of simply different upbringing in different
|
||
|
|
families the family cultures but in either case the guess culture is one based on empathy
|
||
|
|
and anticipating the other person's needs in a guess culture minor things that you want from the
|
||
|
|
other person that make your life more comfortable are left unsaid because the expectation is that
|
||
|
|
the other person will understand and act on it based on empathy and mutual understanding
|
||
|
|
so a guess culture is where you don't ask the other person for minus favors that you would like
|
||
|
|
to be done but you only ask them for things that you really need get done and the other things are
|
||
|
|
supposed to get done automatically in contrast to that the ask culture is where you're allowed
|
||
|
|
and encouraged to ask for anything that you prefer the other person does regardless of which
|
||
|
|
importance and regardless of how obvious that need already is so in an ask culture anything can
|
||
|
|
be asked for and importantly saying no to things is regularly expected to an ask person and no
|
||
|
|
is just part of a regular interaction and doesn't mean much but to a guess person who already makes
|
||
|
|
the request only when it's of sufficient importance and no is a big deal there are advantages and
|
||
|
|
disadvantages to both sides for example the ask culture is obviously clearer in communication
|
||
|
|
whereas the guess culture has more chance of miscommunication on the other hand people in
|
||
|
|
guess cultures often feel more closer and more intimate because they have anticipated the other
|
||
|
|
person's needs instead of needing words while an ask person might go to the extreme of not giving up
|
||
|
|
their seat for a pregnant woman and then saying why did you ask for it so both cultures work in
|
||
|
|
different ways for different people but there can be and are clashes and they both get together
|
||
|
|
and try to make a relationship work if they don't understand that communication works differently
|
||
|
|
for the other person there's a lot of chance of misunderstanding and unnecessary conflicts
|
||
|
|
this ask versus guess culture idea has also been very useful for many relationships
|
||
|
|
and as far as I can tell it seems to have originated on the internet from a post on meta filter
|
||
|
|
and then been picked up by so many others neither this culture divide nor those languages of love
|
||
|
|
are precise and unique people generally are made up of a mixture of these different kinds of
|
||
|
|
communication just with one or two of those as their primary most effective means of communicating
|
||
|
|
and expressing love so that's about it for today I hope that the world went through neuroscience
|
||
|
|
and psychology and counseling and finally to internet posts was overall useful and maybe even
|
||
|
|
contained a couple of things that you might use for this Valentine's Day wish you all a very happy
|
||
|
|
Valentine's Day and talk to you later bye bye
|
||
|
|
you've been listening to hecka public radio at hecka public radio dot org
|
||
|
|
we are a community podcast network that releases shows every weekday Monday through Friday
|
||
|
|
today's show like all our shows was contributed by an hbr listener like yourself
|
||
|
|
if you ever thought of recording a podcast then click on our contributing
|
||
|
|
to find out how easy it really is hecka public radio was founded by the digital dog pound
|
||
|
|
and the infonomican computer club and it's part of the binary revolution at binrev.com
|
||
|
|
if you have comments on today's show please email the host directly leave a comment on the website
|
||
|
|
or record a follow-up episode yourself unless otherwise status today's show is released on
|
||
|
|
creative comments, attribution, share a light, 3.0 license
|