93 lines
7.7 KiB
Plaintext
93 lines
7.7 KiB
Plaintext
|
|
Episode: 1745
|
||
|
|
Title: HPR1745: 51 - LibreOffice Impress - Overview and Guidance
|
||
|
|
Source: https://hub.hackerpublicradio.org/ccdn.php?filename=/eps/hpr1745/hpr1745.mp3
|
||
|
|
Transcribed: 2025-10-18 08:41:59
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
---
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
This is HPR episode 1745 entitled 51 Libri Office Impress Overview and Guidance,
|
||
|
|
and is part of the series Libri Office. It is hosted by Ahaka and is about 11 minutes long.
|
||
|
|
The summary is introduction to making presentations with some good advice.
|
||
|
|
This episode of HPR is brought to you by an honest host.com.
|
||
|
|
Get 15% discount on all shared hosting with the offer code HPR15. That's HPR15.
|
||
|
|
Better web hosting that's honest and fair at An Honesthost.com.
|
||
|
|
Hello, this is Ahuka welcoming you to Hacker Public Radio and another in our exciting series
|
||
|
|
on Libri Office and we are about to start something new and that is Libri Office Impress,
|
||
|
|
which is the presentation graphics or slide deck if you want to call it that application
|
||
|
|
for Libri Office. I want to start at a high level here because as I have pointed out with other
|
||
|
|
components of Libri Office, it is very important that we do not rush into clicking buttons
|
||
|
|
and making settings but instead begin with an idea of how to use the program and why you would
|
||
|
|
want to use it. And this is if anything even more of an issue with presentation software like
|
||
|
|
Impress. It's more widely used competitor, Microsoft Office's PowerPoint, has given rise to
|
||
|
|
the expression death by PowerPoint, which expresses very nicely the feeling of being trapped in a room
|
||
|
|
and forced to endure a bad presentation. You would not want your presentations to create this
|
||
|
|
type of feeling. So what should a presentation do and what guidelines can we suggest to the practitioner?
|
||
|
|
Well, we do have a number of good resources to call upon but it is worth noting that for this
|
||
|
|
purpose, most of our sources will not be about Libri Office Impress per se but about competing
|
||
|
|
products like Microsoft PowerPoint. That is fine because we are talking about broad principles,
|
||
|
|
not about the tool specific advice that later tutorials will address.
|
||
|
|
Now my first resource will be Edward Tufty. You may remember him from our tutorial on
|
||
|
|
graphs and charts in Calc because he is the leading expert on graphical displays of information.
|
||
|
|
But for this tutorial, I'm going to highlight a small booklet he has published,
|
||
|
|
link in the show notes, called the cognitive style of PowerPoint pitching out corrupts within.
|
||
|
|
This is available for sale from his website in a combined physical and electronic version for
|
||
|
|
only $7 in the United States and is worth every penny. I won't try to cover everything he says
|
||
|
|
in this booklet because you should buy a copy if you are that interested but he makes some provocative
|
||
|
|
opening points. First is that PowerPoint compared to other presentation tools reduces the
|
||
|
|
analytical quality of serious presentations of evidence. Secondly, this is especially the case
|
||
|
|
for the PowerPoint ready made templates which corrupt statistical reasoning and often weaken
|
||
|
|
verbal and spatial thinking. He goes on to praise the analytical quality of using actual sentences
|
||
|
|
and paragraphs which can be arranged to make meaningful statements. So what are some of the
|
||
|
|
problems that presentation software poses for effective communication? There are several worth
|
||
|
|
pointing out. Presentations are relentlessly linear but often people absorb information more
|
||
|
|
effectively when they can access information in parallel. Second, presentations do not reflect
|
||
|
|
the character of the content but instead the limitations of the software. Third, presentations
|
||
|
|
place all of the control in the hands of the presenter but people learn better when they control
|
||
|
|
the flow of information. So try to imagine what a comparison would be like between good presentations
|
||
|
|
and good teaching. Most presentations are like a dry and boring lecturer droning on in a monotone
|
||
|
|
and putting the class to sleep. In such a case very little learning would take place.
|
||
|
|
A good teacher uses a variety of strategies and methods to enliven the classroom and make learning
|
||
|
|
interesting. This is a distinct contrast to death by PowerPoint. A congruent critique of bad
|
||
|
|
presentations was offered by the labor office guru Bruce Bifield in a recent column for Linux
|
||
|
|
Pro Magazine called how to avoid giving a summary presentation. He makes several good points here
|
||
|
|
such as knowing your material well enough that you don't need to read from the notes
|
||
|
|
and making sure you keep moving around the room. But the most important point is that a
|
||
|
|
presentation should not summarize what you were saying. It should supplement what you were saying.
|
||
|
|
Or put another way if you are simply reading the slides everyone will be reading along with you
|
||
|
|
and they will be entirely focused on the slides. And they should really be focused on you as the
|
||
|
|
presenter. For my last resource I want to use a very good article called seven lessons from the
|
||
|
|
world's most captivating presenters by Marta Kagan. In this article she talks about several people
|
||
|
|
such as Steve Jobs and Gary Vaynerchuk and says that these captivating speakers have lessons to
|
||
|
|
impart to all of us that would make our presentations better. Here are the principles she found in
|
||
|
|
their work. One, start with paper not PowerPoint. The single most important thing you can do to
|
||
|
|
dramatically improve your presentations is to have a story to tell before you work on your PowerPoint
|
||
|
|
file. Number two, tell your story in three acts. Why should I care? How will this affect me?
|
||
|
|
What do I need to do? Number three, a picture is worth a thousand words.
|
||
|
|
Number four, emotions get our attention.
|
||
|
|
Number five, use plain English or whatever language you are speaking.
|
||
|
|
Number six, ditch the bullet points. Number seven, rehearse like crazy.
|
||
|
|
Now to get the full flavor you should really read the whole thing on her site. The link is in the
|
||
|
|
show notes. I assure you it will be worth every moment of your time. Now most of what we'll be doing in
|
||
|
|
these tutorials will focus on the nuts and bolts of using the software and that is not necessarily a
|
||
|
|
bad thing but I wanted to make sure you had a good beginning point before you start. In other words
|
||
|
|
it pays to think before you start. One last illustration will come from an experience I had of a
|
||
|
|
great presenter who came to my project management institute chapter meeting. His slide deck consisted
|
||
|
|
completely of pictures. There was not a single word of text on any of the slides. On one slide was
|
||
|
|
a picture of bullets, you know, the kind that guns fire and he said these are the only bullets you
|
||
|
|
will see this evening. Each picture helped to illustrate what he was saying in some way but the
|
||
|
|
focus was on him, not his slide deck and he had clear mastery of his topic. This is something we can
|
||
|
|
all aspire to. And last I'm going to just mention a resource again link in the show notes.
|
||
|
|
Presentation magazine. It's an online only publication. They offer an RSS feed and an email newsletter.
|
||
|
|
So that's just something that if you do a lot of presentations and want to improve you might
|
||
|
|
find some useful stuff there as well. So with that I'm going to wrap this one up. This is a Huka
|
||
|
|
for Hacker Public Radio reminding you as always to support free software. Bye bye.
|
||
|
|
You've been listening to Hacker Public Radio at Hacker Public Radio dot org.
|
||
|
|
We are a community podcast network that releases shows every weekday Monday through Friday.
|
||
|
|
Today's show like all our shows was contributed by an HBR listener like yourself.
|
||
|
|
If you ever thought of recording a podcast and click on our contributing to find out how easy it
|
||
|
|
really is. Hacker Public Radio was founded by the digital dog pound and the infonomicon computer club
|
||
|
|
and is part of the binary revolution at binrev.com. If you have comments on today's show
|
||
|
|
please email the host directly leave a comment on the website or record a follow-up episode yourself
|
||
|
|
unless otherwise stated. Today's show is released under Creative Commons
|
||
|
|
Attribution ShareLight 3.0 license.
|