336 lines
30 KiB
Plaintext
336 lines
30 KiB
Plaintext
|
|
Episode: 97
|
||
|
|
Title: HPR0097: An Interview with Tony Wright
|
||
|
|
Source: https://hub.hackerpublicradio.org/ccdn.php?filename=/eps/hpr0097/hpr0097.mp3
|
||
|
|
Transcribed: 2025-10-07 11:29:04
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
---
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
MUSIC
|
||
|
|
Good evening, I'm Trek Nubis, and I had the opportunity to interview the founder of my
|
||
|
|
new favorite productivity tool, Rescue Time, so I'll go ahead and let the interview speak
|
||
|
|
for itself.
|
||
|
|
I'm Tony Wright, I'm the founder of RescueTime.com, which is, well, you're probably going
|
||
|
|
to ask me what Rescue Time does in the next question, but Rescue Time is a software that
|
||
|
|
gives individuals and businesses a kind of unique and fresh understanding of how they
|
||
|
|
spend their time and provides tools to help them spend it more productively.
|
||
|
|
So who's this product aimed at, is it mostly businesses or individuals or what's going
|
||
|
|
on?
|
||
|
|
Well, so we started with the idea that we wanted to target kind of individuals, and it
|
||
|
|
was attacking kind of a personal problem of our own that, you know, that we had, we
|
||
|
|
were doing the Scrum methodology when we were doing some software development at a company
|
||
|
|
called Jobster, and every day people's job was to sort of articulate what they did in
|
||
|
|
the previous 24 hours and what they were going to get done in the next 24, and we found
|
||
|
|
that people's ability to sort of talk about what they did in the last 24 hours was awful.
|
||
|
|
They'd say, well, I thought I was going to get done, you know, these three things, but,
|
||
|
|
you know, it turns out that I only got this thing done, but I felt really busy, and I
|
||
|
|
don't know why.
|
||
|
|
So the idea, and I kind of had this suspicion that I was, you know, while I thought I
|
||
|
|
was a web developer for a living, in fact, I was increasingly turning into an emailer
|
||
|
|
and instant messenger for a living, and that that's where most of my time was.
|
||
|
|
So we wanted to kind of build this, and the idea was, you know, initially it was just
|
||
|
|
kind of for us, and as a side project, but as we talked to it to friends and other developers
|
||
|
|
more and more, we realized that there were some other people who had some interest.
|
||
|
|
So it kind of very slowly sort of morphed its way into that.
|
||
|
|
So we're, to start with, we're targeting individuals, I think as we, you know, as the
|
||
|
|
product matures a little bit and gets, gets more stable and gets more powerful, I think
|
||
|
|
there is a lot of potential with kind of small teams kind of to attack this in a collaborative
|
||
|
|
way to understand how they are collectively spending their time, because I mean, obviously
|
||
|
|
everyone's pretty buried in with the information overload issues, and we think that it would
|
||
|
|
be better if people spent less time at their, in front of their computers and, and spend
|
||
|
|
it kind of more efficiently so that they could, you know, have a life outside of their
|
||
|
|
computers.
|
||
|
|
Okay, so you're targeting individuals, you know, how can you help me give me like a
|
||
|
|
use case scenario?
|
||
|
|
Well, I mean, so that there's a couple of different use cases that the, you know, the big
|
||
|
|
one right now, because rescue time effectively is, is capturing what you're paying attention
|
||
|
|
to on the computer, it's ideally suited for people who spend most of their professional
|
||
|
|
life in front of their computer, right?
|
||
|
|
It's less good for people, you know, like a sales guy who's on the road or something like
|
||
|
|
that. So, so the idea is that, that you, you know, and what we see a lot of is people
|
||
|
|
are curious about how they spend their time. They realize that something is wrong, they
|
||
|
|
realize they're not productive as productive as they want to be, and their job is to create
|
||
|
|
some sort of output, right? Whether they're a, a coder or a designer or a writer, you
|
||
|
|
know, they have a vested interest in their own efficiency. So, and if you look at, you
|
||
|
|
know, at any sort of time management system, you know, when you, when you read these kind
|
||
|
|
of business-y self-help books, they say, well, the first thing you should do is keep a log
|
||
|
|
of how you spend your time. And it turns out that's pretty darn impractical. I mean, if you,
|
||
|
|
you imagine writing all this stuff down on a piece of paper, every time you alt tab to an
|
||
|
|
instant message window, you'd have a pretty busy piece of paper pretty quickly.
|
||
|
|
I actually tried doing that once, but I found that I jumped around too much and it was like
|
||
|
|
too much to write down. It wasn't like working out that well.
|
||
|
|
Yeah. I mean, what we're finding is people are alt tabbing. I mean, this is my favorite
|
||
|
|
stat that I pull out at rescue time, is that the average rescue time user is alt tabbing to an
|
||
|
|
instant message window, 77 times per day. And that's the average, right? So, and I, when I looked
|
||
|
|
at my own, I was about 133. And that caused me to be so horrified that I literally uninstalled
|
||
|
|
instant message apps for my computer, just because, I mean, I mean, the idea that we can multitask
|
||
|
|
human beings, I mean, if you poke around about it and research a little bit, it's just not true.
|
||
|
|
We aren't good at it. And those that cut tasks, switching and context switching is both painful
|
||
|
|
and expensive from a productivity point of view. So, the idea is that as an individual,
|
||
|
|
you know, and we see this a lot of with kind of freelance consultants too, who's financial
|
||
|
|
well-being depends on their own efficiency. That their goal is to sort of start to measure and
|
||
|
|
start to repair their kind of own productivity and get more productive. And there's certainly a,
|
||
|
|
you know, just a pure curiosity motivation as well as just, you know, people want to know the
|
||
|
|
answer to this question. And the answer is generally pretty darn entertaining if nothing else.
|
||
|
|
Okay. So, how does this work? Why don't you go ahead and just kind of like explain the process?
|
||
|
|
Sure. So, rescue time is a small downloadable application, a couple hundred K, and it's available
|
||
|
|
for Mac and Windows. And we've actually had someone in the Linux community dive in and make a Linux
|
||
|
|
client as well. But it's a small downloadable application that you will install on your computer.
|
||
|
|
And what it does is it pays attention to what you're focusing on. So, it's not measuring what
|
||
|
|
applications or websites are open, but it's measuring what's in focus. It's going to give you more
|
||
|
|
detail than say Firefox. It's not going to say, well, you spent four hours in Firefox.
|
||
|
|
It's going to actually dive into that and say you spent, you know, 20 minutes at Google and
|
||
|
|
30 minutes on Gmail and, you know, an hour and a half on Facebook or wherever you spend your time.
|
||
|
|
So, the idea is really to capture what your attention, you know, where your attention is going.
|
||
|
|
And it also, of course, idles out. So, if your computer, if your keyboard and mouse are idle for a
|
||
|
|
certain amount of time, it'll decide that you are no longer in front of your computer and kind of
|
||
|
|
close out the current record. Some of this is a little scary, though. It's kind of interesting to
|
||
|
|
see how much time I actually spend on just Google alone. Yeah. There's a blog post that we actually
|
||
|
|
have on our company blog where I actually, within rescue time, so all of this data gets sent to
|
||
|
|
our servers where we kind of, you know, crunch the numbers, then allow you to do analytics on it
|
||
|
|
to see basically a bunch of bar graphs and a bunch of lists. And you can categorize anything,
|
||
|
|
you know, website or application, any way you want via tags, kind of like delicious. So, if,
|
||
|
|
you know, for example, I have decided to tag just because I wanted to know how much Google owned
|
||
|
|
me. I decided to tag every Google product that I used, you know, whether it's Google desktop
|
||
|
|
search or Google search or Gmail or Google Analytics. I tagged all those things as Google so that I can
|
||
|
|
very easily have a day-by-day week-by-week or month-by-month sense of what percentage of my time was
|
||
|
|
spent on some sort of Google product. And when I first did that, it started as 13% on average. And
|
||
|
|
since it grown, about 19% as our company started using Google Docs and Google spreadsheets instead of
|
||
|
|
Microsoft Word and Excel. So, Google is a pretty dominant, but we did find that the still the most
|
||
|
|
dominant application on the planet is Outlook in terms of time spent.
|
||
|
|
Thoughtful question, this is such a fantastic service. How much does it actually cost?
|
||
|
|
Yeah, my home run answer is, yeah, it's right now it's free. So, we're individually
|
||
|
|
used, it's free. The idea is eventually as we kind of roll out some, and that'll be, you know,
|
||
|
|
if we ever say, and I can obviously never say what's going to, what things are going to be the
|
||
|
|
like in years, but we want there to always be a free offering. And we want it to be at least as
|
||
|
|
good as what we have now. So, we are going to make, turn this into crippleware and make it so no one
|
||
|
|
can use it unless they're forking up money. Where we kind of see it going is, you know, charging
|
||
|
|
teams and businesses to kind of see this data in aggregate and to use it kind of collectively
|
||
|
|
and collaboratively. And that's where we see, you know, eventually there being kind of a revenue
|
||
|
|
model. I'm not a big fan of advertisement, just because I don't know, it seems to me that when
|
||
|
|
you put advertisements in a tool, which rescue time is, you know, first and foremost, a tool for
|
||
|
|
people that those ads blend and tend to go away kind of visually pretty quickly, you know, if you
|
||
|
|
aren't, I don't know if you use Gmail or any webmail client, but when I use any webmail client,
|
||
|
|
you know, the ad region disappears for me, right? And you just spend so much time on it that it goes
|
||
|
|
away. So, and that we could obviously, because of the data that we have, give people some pretty
|
||
|
|
amazingly targeted ads, right? We can know, you know, exactly what you're doing. So if you're,
|
||
|
|
you know, Photoshop guy, we can give you great ads for cool Photoshop stuff, but I just don't
|
||
|
|
want to be in the ad business. I, you know, we're sort of more interested in solving people's problems
|
||
|
|
and, and, you know, being helpful for people rather than, you know, trying to trick them into
|
||
|
|
clicking on things, which is what the ad business kind of seems to be. You do have a lot of data,
|
||
|
|
a lot of really cool data. Like, I imagine that you could approach Adobe and say, Hey, you know,
|
||
|
|
we know everything about how people actually use your CS3, you know, master suite. Do you have any
|
||
|
|
plans to maybe sell anonymous data or anything like that? Yeah, I mean, there's the data asset is kind
|
||
|
|
of, I mean, that's a long term thing where I think if we had a big enough user base, you know,
|
||
|
|
I could imagine that that data asset would get pretty interesting. Right now our user base is,
|
||
|
|
is kind of small. We're in the neighborhood of about 33,000 users as of today. And that's growing,
|
||
|
|
you know, at 9% per week now. So that's got to annualize. That'd be about three or four thousand
|
||
|
|
percent growth. But, you know, I think eventually the idea of a data asset play is kind of interesting.
|
||
|
|
We could do something like Alexa does, which is basically kind of published for free, you know,
|
||
|
|
the, you know, kind of a zeitgeist of what people are doing with their time and sort of how that's
|
||
|
|
trending. But yeah, you know, this, obviously there's, you know, some privacy implications here.
|
||
|
|
So not only anonymized, but it would have to be only an aggregate, right? We would never say,
|
||
|
|
you know, here's anonymous, you know, user B, you know, and here's how they spend their time,
|
||
|
|
because I think you can kind of sometimes reverse engineer data like this and get back to some sort
|
||
|
|
of identity. So we really want to avoid that. Well, that sort of happened to Netflix and A,
|
||
|
|
well, they released a whole bunch of, you know, quote-unquote anonymous data. And it was proven
|
||
|
|
that some of that data can be actually, you know, tracked back to the original user.
|
||
|
|
That's nice of them to make those mistakes before we got here. So, so we get a word of, but yeah,
|
||
|
|
I mean, that's kind of a no-brainer. And we do, I mean, a big part of rescue times, you know,
|
||
|
|
feature set is pretty privacy focused. One of my favorite ones is we offer, you know,
|
||
|
|
obviously you don't want to track every single website that you go to. You might have 10 or 12,
|
||
|
|
you know, websites and applications that you use frequently. So we have a feature that's called
|
||
|
|
white lists that allows you to basically keep a list of the sites that you care about, you know,
|
||
|
|
on your computer. And rescue time will basically take that and only send information about those
|
||
|
|
websites up to our servers. Everything else will still get sent, but it will get sent in a sort of
|
||
|
|
other website bucket. So it'll it'll literally never get any other data than the websites that,
|
||
|
|
you know, that you want to send. And the rescue time data also is sent, it's basically pushed as
|
||
|
|
YAML files. I don't this is probably getting relatively geeky, but, but they're basically there,
|
||
|
|
you can see the data that rescue time sends. We do send it securely, but you can see basically
|
||
|
|
exactly, you know, on your hard drive what data we're sending. So the goal is as much as possible,
|
||
|
|
put the data into the user's hands, give them control of what they want to send and what they don't.
|
||
|
|
And once it gets here, you know, we give them control also the ability to delete, you know,
|
||
|
|
data and a selective day-by-day basis or just, you know, they want to wipe a website, you know,
|
||
|
|
if they went to monster.com and they realize, gosh, you know, I don't necessarily want my boss to
|
||
|
|
know that I'm going to monster.com. I'd like to delete that data. They can do so and, you know,
|
||
|
|
basically, you know, that's all under their control. So you have all this data, all these
|
||
|
|
bar graphs and whatnot. What can you do with this data? Can you make it do anything for you,
|
||
|
|
can you, you know, publish it in any way, anything like that? Right. Yeah. So, I mean, the first kind
|
||
|
|
of step of rescue time was to be kind of an analytics package. And we think that just the knowledge
|
||
|
|
of, you know, the ability to see this and crunch around on this data is powerfully motivating and
|
||
|
|
is pretty behavior-changing is what we've seen. We do want to kind of, and we started doing this
|
||
|
|
a little bit, but we do want to move in the direction of kind of giving people tools to help,
|
||
|
|
you know, help themselves along a little bit. So we have a goals and alerts feature.
|
||
|
|
And a TV example, you know, one of my goals is I want to spend less than 30 minutes a day on
|
||
|
|
news and blog sites. So, and I have it set up so that as soon as I exceed 30 minutes a day,
|
||
|
|
I get an SMS message, my phone buzzes with essentially a reminder that, hey, I just blew my
|
||
|
|
goal for the day and I need to get back to work. And there's also positive goals too where you can
|
||
|
|
say, I want to spend, you know, generally I try to aim for, you know, six hours of stuff that I
|
||
|
|
label as work per day, which, you know, you'd think that's not a particularly ambitious goal, but
|
||
|
|
that tends to be in the sort of 97th, 98th percentile of actual work time that people spend on a
|
||
|
|
given day. So, yeah, so I positive goals as well. And you can imagine that within a group or a
|
||
|
|
business setting, you could set it up so that, you know, if your average team member spend say 30
|
||
|
|
minutes doing social networking stuff a day, that you could set it up to send a kind of an automated
|
||
|
|
nudge to any employee that exceeds 30 minutes and say, you know, nothing that's blocking websites
|
||
|
|
or getting kind of, you know, Soviet on it. But, but, you know, something that says, hey, you know what,
|
||
|
|
just want to let you know you're now officially below average on the team in terms of wasting time
|
||
|
|
on social network. So, maybe, maybe kind of think about giving back to work. So we don't want to be
|
||
|
|
like this micro management tool. And that's why we put in a lot of the control into the user's hands.
|
||
|
|
You can't install rescue time in a stealth way so you can never put it on a computer without
|
||
|
|
someone knowing about it. It pops up every time you reboot and there's a big icon in the system tray
|
||
|
|
and like that. So, yeah, so the goal is just to kind of, you know, try to give managers some tools
|
||
|
|
that, you know, kind of allow them to not be micromanagers, but still have their teams kind of,
|
||
|
|
you know, going in the right direction and also give them a little bit of business intelligence
|
||
|
|
to understand, hey, you know, is my team, you know, when you have a small team, you can understand
|
||
|
|
sort of productivity and you can, on a good gut feeling, you can kind of say, yeah, the team kind
|
||
|
|
of feels like we're slowing down, you know, but when you have a team of 20 or 30, then also
|
||
|
|
that your ability to sort of have a gut feeling of team morale and output and productivity is,
|
||
|
|
it's pretty hard to have that. So, so we're hoping we can kind of offer an ability for a manager
|
||
|
|
to look at this data in aggregate. So, not necessarily zooming in on everyone's exact data and
|
||
|
|
really getting really deep into their data, but understanding more just kind of the team aggregate
|
||
|
|
and how that's trending. That's cool. So, what are you working on now if you can talk about any of
|
||
|
|
that at all? Like, what kind of features are you making rolling out soon? Sure. One of the big
|
||
|
|
things we're working on seeing as rescue time and at the very beginning of this, we got kind of
|
||
|
|
hammered by a couple of people like, well, why is this an online tool? You know, why don't you just
|
||
|
|
give me something I can install on my computer and use this? And where rescue time is moving is
|
||
|
|
kind of in more of a sort of social and benchmarky way so that you can imagine that a team you could
|
||
|
|
do some comparison stuff, compare yourself to the average team member, and be also compare yourself
|
||
|
|
to people like yourself. So, if you're a system administrator, you could benchmark yourself against
|
||
|
|
other system administrators. So, yeah. So, I think and the challenge that we had with that is that,
|
||
|
|
well, because we've allowed other, you know, allowed our users to kind of categorize all of their
|
||
|
|
stuff themselves, you know, basically via tags, that people's tags didn't really overlap very
|
||
|
|
reliably. So, for example, you might tag things as work, and I might tag things as productive,
|
||
|
|
which are fairly synonymous, but that makes it very difficult to compare you to me in terms of,
|
||
|
|
you know, two system administrators looking at their time. So, we are actually in the next release,
|
||
|
|
we're doing kind of these more sticky, kind of permanent categories of application and websites,
|
||
|
|
so we can kind of get a little bit more ability to compare, and then give people the ability,
|
||
|
|
and this is something that, you know, some of our users have actually really hot for, is give people
|
||
|
|
the ability to kind of publicly AC, you know, hey, I'm in the top 5% of, you know, Photoshop guys,
|
||
|
|
in terms of just sheer amount of time and effort in Photoshop, and be able to kind of publicly
|
||
|
|
represent that with kind of a, you know, badge, blog widget, you know, Myspace widget, you know,
|
||
|
|
goofy stuff like that. I don't know if you've ever heard of fat blogging that, you know, a bunch of
|
||
|
|
people who got into the concept of, you know, blogging about losing weight, right? And it's kind
|
||
|
|
of a way to keep yourself honest. And so, strangely, a lot of our users want this data to be more
|
||
|
|
public, to sort of keep them from screwing off as much as they might otherwise screw off. So,
|
||
|
|
it's kind of a weird motivation, but it's kind of a life hack, right? And it's a way to sort of,
|
||
|
|
to, you know, make yourself more disciplined than you, than you might otherwise be, which is kind of
|
||
|
|
cool. The same way that it doesn't actually just say, you know, Mozilla Firefox actually says,
|
||
|
|
what web page you're on, it would be really great if you could do the same thing with Insta
|
||
|
|
Messaging, because I find that I waste a lot of my time talking to people I really shouldn't be
|
||
|
|
talking to while I'm working. And, you know, is that feature coming in time soon? Yeah, so we,
|
||
|
|
I mean, there's, there's kind of, you know, I mean, within rescue time data, there's a bunch of
|
||
|
|
black holes. And the, the kind of black hole we attacked out of the gate was the browser. It would
|
||
|
|
be fairly useless for, for me to say, hey, you spend six hours in Firefox, you know, is that good or
|
||
|
|
bad? Well, I don't know. But, you know, there's other black holes like I am, which is, I think you're
|
||
|
|
right. That's, you know, people, you know, you could basically tag people as sort of productive or
|
||
|
|
good people to talk to or, you know, kind of goof off, buddy, kind of conversations. And similarly,
|
||
|
|
the email client of, you know, hey, an outlook, you could spend four hours in outlook as a professional,
|
||
|
|
but that could be good or bad, depending on sort of who you're talking to and, and how you're talking
|
||
|
|
to them. So, so I think there's, there's kind of other cans that we can open. We don't have the,
|
||
|
|
kind of, I am an outlook stuff on the near term. One of the other kind of near term things, which
|
||
|
|
is cool is we have a lot of demand for kind of document and directory understanding. So you can
|
||
|
|
imagine that you're working on four projects in, you know, say you're a writer and you're working
|
||
|
|
on four different, you know, actual documents for four different clients. So you're a freelance
|
||
|
|
person. So to understand sort of, hey, you know, am I working in Acme Incorporated's directory where
|
||
|
|
I have four or five different documents or am I working on, you know, client B's directory and
|
||
|
|
to kind of give, you know, people who are, who are multitasking on multiple projects, the ability
|
||
|
|
to understand, you know, okay, I'm using Microsoft Word, but, but what am I really using it for?
|
||
|
|
So that's, that's on the play too. And that's, that's probably our most demanded feature.
|
||
|
|
Cool. One of my favorite companies is Valve. They make the, like, half of two counterstrike kind of
|
||
|
|
games, right? And they're my favorite company because they're relatively small back when they
|
||
|
|
first started and they're kind of placed where you can actually call the CEO up and talk to him.
|
||
|
|
If you wanted to, it's a very transparent kind of company. If you can actually walk in and see
|
||
|
|
what they're doing, it's an open building. And when I was looking at your, like, support forms,
|
||
|
|
I really got the sense that like your company was actually talking to people in the community,
|
||
|
|
like I was actually seeing, you know, people who work there responding back. Would you say that
|
||
|
|
you're kind of community orientated in some way? There is the, I mean, you could do this company
|
||
|
|
in a lot of different ways, right? And this is something that we could build this, this big,
|
||
|
|
you know, monolith company for the enterprise and, and, you know, I'll put on suits. And we're
|
||
|
|
definitely not that company, right? We did this in a way that was kind of, you know, kind of more
|
||
|
|
for the worker, for the information worker and the knowledge worker because we, because that's what
|
||
|
|
we are. And, you know, yeah, we're small. We're three people, you know, we're pre-funding. We are
|
||
|
|
actually currently fundraising, but we're not looking, you know, we're looking for a, we're looking
|
||
|
|
to grow to a five person team in the near term, not like to grow to a 50 or 100 person team. And I
|
||
|
|
think that, you know, the best thing, you know, the best thing that we did with Rescue Time was we
|
||
|
|
put a little, you know, feedback box on the sidebar of the, basically the entire website, right?
|
||
|
|
So if you're logged in, you'll see a, you know, hey, what do you think about Rescue Time? And, you
|
||
|
|
know, and people give us, I mean, we've literally had four or five thousand messages come in through
|
||
|
|
that little box. And try to respond to a lot of them, you know, but, but yeah, I mean, the
|
||
|
|
conversations we've had with our users have been so amazing. And so, you know, helpful to sort of
|
||
|
|
shape the product in a way that kind of, you know, makes Rescue Time into something that people want
|
||
|
|
rather than, you know, it's easy. A lot of people can try to guess, you know, what kind of product
|
||
|
|
people want. But, you know, really, I think the best way, and we collectively think the best way
|
||
|
|
to kind of build a product is to, you know, launch as early as possible. And then, you know,
|
||
|
|
respond to what the users are saying and doing to try to shape it into something that, you know,
|
||
|
|
people are really excited and jazzed about. So, so yeah, so we definitely, you know, we are,
|
||
|
|
we are a high communication company. Sometimes that's pretty horrifying when I look at my own,
|
||
|
|
you know, time where I, where I spend my time. It's not as much in the development tools and a lot
|
||
|
|
in the communication tools. But, uh, at the end of the day, I think it's definitely worth it.
|
||
|
|
Yeah. So I guess it's kind of, you know, really, really soft and I suppose.
|
||
|
|
Yeah. So if people want to help, uh, what should they do? What can they do?
|
||
|
|
Well, I mean, we have, uh, we'd love to hear from people. I mean, imagine your audience is fairly,
|
||
|
|
fairly geeky. We don't have a published API yet, but we've had a bunch of people build,
|
||
|
|
some cool stuff on top of rescue time. And we'd love to hear from people, you know, with ideas like
|
||
|
|
that. We had a, a couple guys, one from Mac and one from PC who built a tool to manually push
|
||
|
|
data to rescue time. So they could, what they wanted to do is essentially track offline time,
|
||
|
|
like meetings and phone calls. They wanted to be able to push that data to rescue time. So they
|
||
|
|
built tools to do that. We had a guy make a Linux data collector and that could certainly use,
|
||
|
|
and we've had a couple people kind of, you know, checking in code for that, but there's always
|
||
|
|
probably room for help there. And honestly, just use the tool and tell us, you know, what's working
|
||
|
|
for you and what's not and what's confusing and what's not. And, uh, and help us make a better.
|
||
|
|
But yeah, I mean, it's really, uh, we just love to, and honestly, the word amount to, if, uh,
|
||
|
|
if you use it and you like it, you know, tell your friends because that's, uh, right now,
|
||
|
|
again, we're growing like 9% week over week and that's, you know, near as I can tell,
|
||
|
|
we can't take credit for any of that. It's all of our users basically, you know,
|
||
|
|
blogging about it, twittering about it, emailing their friends, you know, just talking about it,
|
||
|
|
and we get some cool press too. So, uh, so yeah, so, uh, yeah, all of that stuff would be great.
|
||
|
|
You're going to kill social networking and people find out how much time they actually spend
|
||
|
|
on these sites. Yeah, we had a, we did, and this is, uh, this should probably hit tech crunch, uh,
|
||
|
|
here, uh, they're going to write up an article on it supposedly, but, uh, we did some,
|
||
|
|
some crunching and basically pulled out, uh, about 500,000 man hours out of our database to do some
|
||
|
|
analysis on. And we found that 44% of the, all of that time represented in those top,
|
||
|
|
or in those kind of top, uh, two or three hundred applications was communication related. It was
|
||
|
|
either email, social networking, instant messaging, you know, and these are all people who,
|
||
|
|
A, people who are, you know, pretty obsessed with productivity, they're trying to be productive,
|
||
|
|
right? And, uh, you know, there are also people who can see all this data and you'd think,
|
||
|
|
so you think that our audience is probably better than most, but to think that nearly half of,
|
||
|
|
you know, production workers, knowledge workers time is spent, essentially just moving
|
||
|
|
information from one human being to another, uh, you know, it's kind of horrifying. We all think we're,
|
||
|
|
you know, we're web developers and we're writers and we're artists or whatever, but uh,
|
||
|
|
turns out we are communicators. That's rather insightful. So if people want to contact you,
|
||
|
|
what should they do? Uh, well, we have a contact page on our website and we're always open for
|
||
|
|
stuff like that. Um, you know, there's a, a forum that we link to from our help page where,
|
||
|
|
you know, people can throw out ideas as well as, you know, kind of bugs and such like that.
|
||
|
|
And of course, just using the service you'll see on that right hand side of the site,
|
||
|
|
there's a little feedback box, you know, we sometimes get one word feedbacks that say, cool,
|
||
|
|
you know, we sometimes get, you know, long essays, uh, you know, people throw out ideas to us.
|
||
|
|
So anything I can go on that box and we read every single, I mean, the whole team reads every single
|
||
|
|
one of those. So, uh, so yeah, we do love to hear from people. Where is this location?
|
||
|
|
Just out of curiosity. This is like your kind of like your house kind of thing or do you actually
|
||
|
|
have a small office building or what's going on? No, we have an office. We actually, so we, um,
|
||
|
|
this was a hobby kind of project. It was a side project. We all had day jobs up until,
|
||
|
|
the first of this year. So around Thanksgiving, last year, we, you know, as we started getting
|
||
|
|
more and more interest, we decided to apply to Y Combinator, uh, which is, uh, it's a kind of seed
|
||
|
|
funding, uh, very hacker centric kind of geek centric seed funding outfit, uh, out of Silicon
|
||
|
|
Valley, uh, led by a guy named Paul Graham, who's a pretty famous software essayist, uh, in the,
|
||
|
|
one of the big kind of list guys. Um, anyway, so, uh, so we applied to Y Combinator and they,
|
||
|
|
I don't know, they get, I don't, they don't release the numbers anymore, but they get in the
|
||
|
|
thousands of applicants, uh, you know, per six month session and we, uh, uh, we got the nod for
|
||
|
|
that. So they picked 20 companies out of those thousands of applicants and, uh, so we've been, uh,
|
||
|
|
up until the end of March, uh, up until I guess April one, uh, we're in Silicon Valley, uh,
|
||
|
|
working with Y Combinator and have since returned to Seattle, uh, and have a small office in Pioneer Square.
|
||
|
|
So yeah, so we are, uh, we are, we are a real business with a real office, uh, but it is definitely
|
||
|
|
small. Okay, if people have any, you know, questions or comments for you, do you have like an email
|
||
|
|
address or a phone number where you can be reached? Yeah, you can shoot to, uh, team TAM at rescuetime.com,
|
||
|
|
and that gets, uh, basically all three team members. Uh, and, uh, we don't actually, uh, maintain a
|
||
|
|
business phone. Uh, if you go to the contact page, you'll see a phone number and it is my cell phone.
|
||
|
|
Uh, and, uh, I, I, I take all sorts of bizarre calls on that number, but, uh, but I'm probably not
|
||
|
|
particularly eager to say it on a podcast, but it's on the contact page. So, uh, so people really want
|
||
|
|
to talk with my voice. Uh, I'm willing. Oh, can't say I blame you. Okay. Well, you know, thank you for
|
||
|
|
your time and thank you so much for being here. No worries. Thank you. Okay. See you.
|
||
|
|
Okay. Well, that was the interview with Tony Wright, the founder of rescuetime.com.
|
||
|
|
If you have any questions or comments from me, I'm not sure what you would, but if you do,
|
||
|
|
you can email me at drakenewisatgemo.com. If you need some, uh, other form of
|
||
|
|
way to contact me, um, I have a ton listed on my about page at drakenewis.com. Um, okay. Great.
|
||
|
|
Thank you for listening to Haqqa Public Radio.
|
||
|
|
HPR is sponsored by kero.net. So head on over to caro.enc for all of the teams.
|