350 lines
32 KiB
Plaintext
350 lines
32 KiB
Plaintext
|
|
Episode: 1497
|
||
|
|
Title: HPR1497: Practical Math - Units - Distances and Area, Part 1
|
||
|
|
Source: https://hub.hackerpublicradio.org/ccdn.php?filename=/eps/hpr1497/hpr1497.mp3
|
||
|
|
Transcribed: 2025-10-18 04:15:45
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
---
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Now let's open up the governments.
|
||
|
|
Hello and welcome to Hacker Public Radio. This is Charles in New Jersey. I'm back with another
|
||
|
|
series on Maths. This time it's not recreational math. It's what I would call practical math.
|
||
|
|
Today's show is going to focus on using and converting between units of distance and area.
|
||
|
|
I'm going to start with an example to tell you how the whole thing is going to be treated.
|
||
|
|
And if you only listen to this part, you'll have the general idea, but I'm about to discuss,
|
||
|
|
in your mind, and it might help you as you go forward in problems where units and units conversion
|
||
|
|
come up. Now suppose John has nine apples in his basket. If he gives away two apples to marry,
|
||
|
|
how many does he have left? Of course the answer is seven, right? Well in school I suppose you
|
||
|
|
could get away with saying just seven because the teacher would know what you meant. They'd know
|
||
|
|
that you said, okay nine apples and gives away two apples and okay that's really just code for
|
||
|
|
a subtraction problem of nine minus two and get seven, right? Well I'm hoping to change the way
|
||
|
|
you look at this. What I want to emphasize today is keeping the units in the math equation.
|
||
|
|
So when you're doing any kind of reasoning or calculation on physical objects or distances or
|
||
|
|
times or volumes or areas or speeds or voltages, what have you? That you'll always give the answer
|
||
|
|
with the units attached because if the units are correct, you have a much better chance
|
||
|
|
of having the right numerical answer, the right number of units, so that you won't be the one
|
||
|
|
to send a spaceship to Mars and crash it into the planet because you supplied a number
|
||
|
|
for a parameter to a subroutine that was for English measurements when the subroutine
|
||
|
|
was expecting metric for the other way around. So if John has nine apples and he gives away two
|
||
|
|
apples from his basket to marry, he doesn't have seven left, he has seven apples left. Now you're
|
||
|
|
going to get sick of me saying that seven is in some way a wrong answer and the answer is seven
|
||
|
|
apples, but you will thank me when we start talking about things like square miles being converted
|
||
|
|
to O hectares. I think you're going to appreciate the importance of carrying the units in even the
|
||
|
|
simplest of calculations involving something physical, something that you can count or measure
|
||
|
|
or experience or see. Very important that you get the units right. If you don't get the units
|
||
|
|
right, you may not get the answer right and if you give the wrong answer as just a number, someone
|
||
|
|
could use it and get hurt and we don't want that. So here's segment one. I'm going to talk about
|
||
|
|
distance and area in the English system and some of these things are pretty wild. I left out
|
||
|
|
quite a number of them because there's just so many. Unless you consider the history, they're just
|
||
|
|
very strange. So I'll give a little synopsis of some English units, how they relate to one another,
|
||
|
|
where some of them came from and how you would convert from one to the other when you need to.
|
||
|
|
Now I'm going to talk about the English system and the metric system eventually, but in some
|
||
|
|
sense measurements are really kind of arbitrary. I could have used a distance of measure that was the
|
||
|
|
width of my grandson's hand and on the day he turned two years old and I could have called it the
|
||
|
|
dexter because I used his right hand or I could use another alternative measure, which is the
|
||
|
|
the span of his left hand the day he turned three. I could call that the sinister. It's probably
|
||
|
|
just as valid as whatever originally gave us the idea of the inch and the foot and the yard
|
||
|
|
and even the mile that we've used for without thinking about it really for a long time.
|
||
|
|
So let's get into the English system. Now the basic units of distance without getting into the
|
||
|
|
micro distances are our familiar friends, the inch, the foot, the yard, and the mile. Now the
|
||
|
|
units of area are the square inch, the square foot, the acre, and square mile. There are of course
|
||
|
|
others. If you're buying carpet you probably have talked about buying a certain number of square
|
||
|
|
yards. You might even have called it yards. Now there are other units of distance and an area
|
||
|
|
of course. The barley corn is still used in some shoe sizes. That's a third of an inch.
|
||
|
|
There's the hand which is four inches for describing the size of a horse. There's the rod that's
|
||
|
|
used in surveying. That's 16 and a half feet or five and a half yards. There's a chain which is
|
||
|
|
also from surveying and building which is four linear rods which you can convert to 66 feet or
|
||
|
|
22 yards, a lot of inches. And it probably originally referred to an actual chain that was used,
|
||
|
|
that was a standard length so that you could measure a field without having to keep moving the
|
||
|
|
ends of the chain hundreds of times. It was probably convenient for measuring frontage with only a
|
||
|
|
few measurements and getting it right. The fewer times you have to play around with the end points,
|
||
|
|
the less error correction you'll have to do when you finally look at the data in your diagrams
|
||
|
|
and figure out the area of the field or piece of property. Let's see what are some others.
|
||
|
|
Well, there's the fur long that some of us know from horse racing, although it's really a more
|
||
|
|
general agricultural term from plowing. That's 220 yards or 40 rods or 10 chains. I guess the fur
|
||
|
|
long was originally the greatest length of a furrow that you could plow without resting your
|
||
|
|
animals. So it might have come from furrow long but furlong is what we have and it's about an
|
||
|
|
eighth of a mile. In fact, it is an eighth of a mile and I'll get into that in a moment. Another
|
||
|
|
unit of measure would be the league which was supposed to be about an hour's walk, I guess,
|
||
|
|
through the woods because it's assumed to be about three miles. So if you're looking at 20,000
|
||
|
|
leagues under the sea, that's really, really deep, just kidding. I'm really just kind of being silly
|
||
|
|
there. 20,000 leagues refer to distance traveled in a submarine which travels under the sea.
|
||
|
|
For ships at sea, one league would be three nautical miles which is more consistent and useful.
|
||
|
|
So I'm going to now share with you what I'm calling brilliant insight number one units of
|
||
|
|
distance are somewhat arbitrary. Now we did not standardize on inches or feet or miles or
|
||
|
|
these others because they're in some sense magical numbers handed to us by some deity or whatever
|
||
|
|
you pray to. We used them because they were convenient and we standardized on them because they
|
||
|
|
let us talk to each other. When you have a standard unit of distance, you can start talking about
|
||
|
|
how far something is or how tall someone is or the signs of a room or the length of the
|
||
|
|
piece of wood that you're buying without having to be there in the same place at the same time.
|
||
|
|
I don't think we'd get very far in building houses if builders had to ask for
|
||
|
|
boards that are as long as my arm or a plank that's oh yay long. If you're not standing in the same
|
||
|
|
room if you're talking on the telephone, yay long doesn't buy you anything. So you really want to
|
||
|
|
have standard units. So you can order things by writing down the measurement on a piece of paper
|
||
|
|
and sending it with a messenger or in these days you could order it online because you have measured
|
||
|
|
it and both people on each end of the communication will know what's meant when you say something is
|
||
|
|
six feet long. Okay that's the English standard unit six feet. Okay I know I know how to measure that
|
||
|
|
so I'll give you the accurate measure. Okay now some of the some of the units that I talked about
|
||
|
|
earlier seem a little odd right seem a little just a little bizarre. Now the rod and the chain. Now
|
||
|
|
these are these were I guess used in measuring farmland of building plots and other things that
|
||
|
|
surveyors need to measure. Now a rod is five and a half yards or 16 and a half feet. What is that?
|
||
|
|
I guess it was convenient because that's probably a the size of an actual rod you could use to measure
|
||
|
|
in certain places. It's not so short that you have to lay it down 150 times to get across
|
||
|
|
someone's frontage but it's not so long that the stick starts to bend and warp and collapse under
|
||
|
|
its own weight. Maybe it's kind of a convenient link. Now for longer distances you could use
|
||
|
|
the chain which is four linear rods or the length of some surveyors chain back in history.
|
||
|
|
Now I guess suppose you could have defined these originally to have been longer or shorter
|
||
|
|
but this is a standard that emerged from usage over time and that's what we have. Okay now a fur
|
||
|
|
as I said before that's the an agreement that it's the longest row you can plow without resting the
|
||
|
|
animals and it happens to be ten chains long. So you've got even though these are somewhat weird
|
||
|
|
sounding units of measure or distance they are related and they're consistent with one another.
|
||
|
|
So you can use them together and not have to worry about this fractional piece left over because
|
||
|
|
rod and the furlong aren't exactly in sync not an even number of rods in a furlong
|
||
|
|
no they're consistent and it works. Now if you want to get into bizarre let's go to the acre
|
||
|
|
which is the measure of area and if you're ever on a quiz show an acre is 43,560 square feet.
|
||
|
|
How about that huh? But if you're ever on a quiz you should remember that if the category is
|
||
|
|
English units of measure. Okay now it's defined as an area of a plot that's one chain wide by a furlong
|
||
|
|
in length and if you remember that a furlong is ten chains you will see that an acre is really
|
||
|
|
the area of a rectangle that's one chain in width by ten chains in length so you could call it
|
||
|
|
ten square chains and square chains is as good as square feet or square yards it's a unit of area
|
||
|
|
just as one square foot is the area of a square that's a foot on each side a square chain would be
|
||
|
|
the area of a square that is one chain on each side so it's not really that hard to see where they
|
||
|
|
might have come to this unit of measure that turns out to be this weird number but it came from
|
||
|
|
something that was consistent to the people who are measuring fields using instruments like chains
|
||
|
|
and it actually makes sense that an acre is the area of a field that has sides that are integer
|
||
|
|
numbers of these chains so when you multiply it together you get a weird looking number but it's
|
||
|
|
actually quite easy to see where it came from and if you're not convinced I'm not going to be able
|
||
|
|
to convince you I'll just move on now let's see let me back up a bit how did I get to that bit
|
||
|
|
about an acre being ten square chains because it was defined as an acre is one chain by one furlong
|
||
|
|
now I also know that a furlong is ten chains and I can set up a conversion factor by comparing
|
||
|
|
ten chains and one furlong because if I take two things that are equal let's imagine an equation
|
||
|
|
one furlong equals ten chains and I divide them both by the same quantity let's say I divide each
|
||
|
|
side of that equation by one furlong well then I'll get one furlong over one furlong equals one
|
||
|
|
and ten chains over one furlong must also be equal to one because equals divided by the same
|
||
|
|
thing if a divisor is not zero will give you equals so when I'm doing unit conversion I'm going to
|
||
|
|
get to this in just a bit I'm really in a sense I'm multiplying by one because one furlong
|
||
|
|
is ten chains so if I multiply by a quantity that is a ratio of ten chains to one furlong
|
||
|
|
I'm really multiplying by one so I get an acre is one chain times one furlong times one but
|
||
|
|
instead of one I'll use ten chains over one furlong furlong's cancel I get an acre is equal to
|
||
|
|
one chain times ten chains or ten square chains so keeping the units in the equation is a kind of
|
||
|
|
magic it really helps I think we should go forward I'll explain a couple of other things and then
|
||
|
|
I'll get into converting between units the mile has a similar story except there's a historical
|
||
|
|
development that explains why is it that a mile is 5,280 feet well the mile came into use in the
|
||
|
|
culture that gave us the English system of units during the Roman occupation because they marched
|
||
|
|
a lot the Romans had a unit of measure that the English people began to call the mile they
|
||
|
|
standardized on five thousand feet which was about the length of a thousand double steps
|
||
|
|
or paces a person from that period two steps would take you about five feet so they decided okay
|
||
|
|
five thousand feet a thousand melee paces let's call it a mile and it worked for them for
|
||
|
|
probably fifteen hundred years now the Roman mile was a little short for practical use
|
||
|
|
partly because the Roman foot was shorter than our modern English foot so we ended up getting into
|
||
|
|
a lot of different measures that were all called the mile some of them persist to this day
|
||
|
|
it was the old English mile the Irish mile the Scottish mile and there was probably a Welsh
|
||
|
|
mile and other miles depending on where you lived now going forward if you were trying to
|
||
|
|
standardize what would be a good standard well I was thinking that I would speak of this to
|
||
|
|
simplify things using a Roman inspired mile which would be 5,000 English feet
|
||
|
|
which would make things a little bit simpler than referring to all the different legacy miles that
|
||
|
|
we were talking about before so I'm going to call 5,000 English feet the Roman inspired mile
|
||
|
|
now Elizabeth the first came in and she created something through parliament called the statute
|
||
|
|
and the statute mile was set equal to eight furlongs which is our current mile is seventeen hundred
|
||
|
|
and sixty yards or five thousand two hundred and eighty feet I know that metric users are probably
|
||
|
|
looking at this and saying all right you have a unit that was five thousand feet is a mile
|
||
|
|
and you made it five thousand two hundred and eighty feet to make it equal to eight furlongs
|
||
|
|
what gives why not at least make it ten furlongs or something well I'm sure that even though
|
||
|
|
Elizabeth was the queen she still didn't want to create huge disruptions in society the goal
|
||
|
|
presumably was to set the new mile equal to some integer number of furlongs because the furlong
|
||
|
|
was really in use it related to agriculture in many different ways as we've already seen
|
||
|
|
how we measure farmland and even how we set work rules on how much to plow without resting
|
||
|
|
and people were using and they liked the mile as it was but it would be convenient to have
|
||
|
|
an even number of furlongs in a mile so as a compromise this new statute mile was pretty close
|
||
|
|
to my Roman inspired mile of five thousand feet only about five percent longer and within
|
||
|
|
striking distance of the miles already in use and yet it was equal to an even number of furlongs
|
||
|
|
so you didn't have to say it was oh eight furlongs less two hundred and eighty feet
|
||
|
|
that doesn't really doesn't really work but if you say it's eight furlongs then okay you can
|
||
|
|
even work with that because then you can have you can quote distances as a quarter mile a half a
|
||
|
|
mile and if somebody's trying to picture that they can say well that's a quarter mile is two
|
||
|
|
furlongs a half a mile is four furlongs so it does kind of make sense it has practical benefits
|
||
|
|
because you can talk about how far something is in terms of furlongs which you might know
|
||
|
|
or the new mile which people are getting used to it's it's defined in terms of something familiar
|
||
|
|
and yet it's close to the old unit that people used to use and I guess anybody who didn't like it
|
||
|
|
very much could either move or be very confused and they talked to other people so now we have
|
||
|
|
this this unit called a mile that measures five thousand two hundred and eighty feet so if we're
|
||
|
|
gonna have units that are these crazy multiples of something that we do know like a foot it would
|
||
|
|
probably be helpful if we knew reliable ways to convert between units so that we're comfortable
|
||
|
|
that we're getting the answer right if you've ever had to convert between temperature scales you're
|
||
|
|
going to like distances in about a minute because remember that the whole thing about converting
|
||
|
|
between Fahrenheit and Celsius where they had zero in different places and there were negative
|
||
|
|
temperatures and positive temperatures and they they started in different places you had to do
|
||
|
|
this offset thing and then adjust to the scales well distances don't do that zero is zero and there
|
||
|
|
are no negative distances unless you start talking about vector quantities which have direction
|
||
|
|
as well as length and if you understand vectors you don't really need to listen to this podcast
|
||
|
|
because you probably will understand all of this at least as well as I do so just think of it this
|
||
|
|
way you don't have to worry about shifting anything units of distance you can define them in terms
|
||
|
|
of the scale factor you know there's a foot and if you want to use a larger basic unit you could
|
||
|
|
use a yard three feet cool there's an inch but if you want to use a more refined unit or talk to
|
||
|
|
somebody in Britain or in Canada you could use a centimeter which thank goodness is now exactly
|
||
|
|
2.54 centimeters to the inch it used to be approximately that but somebody changed the length of
|
||
|
|
one or the other of the platinum bars that they use as the standard for these things so that the
|
||
|
|
centimeter is defined so that it is exactly 2.54 centimeters to the inch but don't be afraid of the
|
||
|
|
2.54 bit because a mile is defined as 5,280 feet a foot is 12 inches a hand is four inches a yard is
|
||
|
|
36 inches they're just arbitrary fixed units of distance they're just of different lengths
|
||
|
|
so that if you take a distance measured in one unit and you want to convert it to another unit
|
||
|
|
all you need is the scale factor that converts the first unit to the second and all of this works
|
||
|
|
because we have agreed it's easy to agree in a natural way on what is zero distances so we don't
|
||
|
|
have to adjust for shifts and origin as we will have to do when we play around with non absolute
|
||
|
|
temperature scales and so on we'll get to temperature scales and non absolute scales soon enough
|
||
|
|
but it'll be in another show so you don't have to tune out now we're not going to go there now for
|
||
|
|
absolute scales like distances all we need is a conversion factor and a calculator if you need one
|
||
|
|
I don't think I'll be doing any calculations that really need a calculator but if you need one
|
||
|
|
get it out now okay yeah for absolute scales like distances we can convert from from any one unit
|
||
|
|
to another one using a conversion factor and I'm going to show you how to set these up
|
||
|
|
because when you're first looking at conversion factors the question that I get all the time
|
||
|
|
from newbies is all right I know that an inch is 2.54 centimeters so I want to convert from
|
||
|
|
centimeters to inches or inches to centimeters how do I know whether I'm going to divide or multiply
|
||
|
|
by that 2.54 and people ask us all the time I'm serious I mean it's it's a problem that you have
|
||
|
|
to think through or did you get it right but once you have a system for doing it you don't have to
|
||
|
|
think about it every single time you approach it if you're just doing it at all every time you might
|
||
|
|
have to go through this whole thought process of oh my goodness how do I do that and do I divide
|
||
|
|
if they bigger they smaller all that's good but if you have a system for doing it that takes care
|
||
|
|
of all the accounting for which unit I'm in now you'll have a much better chance of having the
|
||
|
|
right intuition getting the right number and getting the right units so that nobody's embarrassed
|
||
|
|
or getting hurt I think we ought to fix this in your minds by working through a couple of examples
|
||
|
|
okay first I guess I'll pose a couple of problems now I know that a foot is 12 inches so how many
|
||
|
|
inches would there be in say 10 feet or look at the other way how many feet might there be in
|
||
|
|
660 inches two different problems I warn you in advance so you can't say oh just you can't just
|
||
|
|
pick off the numbers that I've quoted because they are two different problems but there I chose the
|
||
|
|
two problems because ones going from inches to feet the other ones going from feet to inches now
|
||
|
|
it's clear that going either direction that a factor of 12 should really be involved because the
|
||
|
|
foot is 12 inches and how do I know when I'm going to either multiply or divide by 12 in the conversion
|
||
|
|
well let's take a look at it if we do it with a naive setup then I'll answer the first one by
|
||
|
|
saying 10 feet well that's 12 times 10 inches or 120 inches and 660 inches is 660 divided by 12 or
|
||
|
|
let's see 600 divided by 12 is 50 60 divided by 12 is 5 55 feet well how do you know that you did
|
||
|
|
it the right way in each case I sort of wrote down these numbers and you can see it in the show
|
||
|
|
notes that without the units it looks like magic because I just I just sort of knew which I had to
|
||
|
|
do I'm going feet inches I I multiply going inches to feet I divide inches are not feet and the
|
||
|
|
only way to make sure you're doing the right thing when you go from under the other is to develop a
|
||
|
|
system and this system is fairly simple to write down the calculation in such a way that you
|
||
|
|
cannot get lost unless you make it all messy and everything but if you work through the calculations
|
||
|
|
and cancel units against identical units and numbers against numbers and multiply everything
|
||
|
|
together if you come out with the right units at the end all you have to check is your arithmetic
|
||
|
|
much easier than having to check whether you did the right calculation that's checking my math
|
||
|
|
the process by which I got from one to the other if I got from inches did a conversion factor
|
||
|
|
with that that whole thing it relates the the source unit and the target unit in the right way
|
||
|
|
and I do all my canceling and I get the right unit at the end I've done the right process
|
||
|
|
and all I have to check is whether my multiplication was right and I can do that with a calculator
|
||
|
|
and have some confidence that I got it right without having to step it off um if I just write down
|
||
|
|
numbers I'm yeah I might get the arithmetic right but if I'm not keeping track of everything that I
|
||
|
|
did I may not be able to be sure that I worked out the procedure quickly that I got the math right
|
||
|
|
so here's a system for creating factors conversion factors that tell you exactly what's going on
|
||
|
|
at each step so when you're doing the conversion you can really be sure that you know what's going
|
||
|
|
on and that you've got it all right and the basis of it I think of already said is the very obvious fact
|
||
|
|
that when I multiply any number any quantity by one the answer or the value of that quantity remains
|
||
|
|
the same how do I turn that into a system for doing successful unit conversions well let's start with
|
||
|
|
the other idea that I already told you about let's start with identities that we know are true
|
||
|
|
in this case we're talking about inches and feet so let's say let's start with 12 inches equals
|
||
|
|
one foot I've already said if I divide two equal values by the same quantity I'm not saying number
|
||
|
|
here I'm saying quantity because the quantity includes the units and that's the the leap that we're
|
||
|
|
making we're going to carry the units with us and if we do it correctly we can use the cancelation
|
||
|
|
laws that anything divided by itself will be one to work through the conversion and make sure that
|
||
|
|
the quantity that we end up with including the units is in the right units and it's the right number
|
||
|
|
so let's turn that equation 12 inches equals one foot into conversion factors that work in either
|
||
|
|
direction okay to go from inches to feet I can divide both sides of this equation 12 inches equals
|
||
|
|
one foot by the quantity 12 inches the left hand side 12 inches over 12 inches is equal to one
|
||
|
|
the right hand side is one foot divided by 12 inches well since I started out with an equality
|
||
|
|
I divided by the same quantity that's not zero that's undefined I have to have equals so that one
|
||
|
|
foot divided by 12 inches is equal to one now if I go the other way I could divide both sides by
|
||
|
|
one foot that actually gives me a conversion factor to go from feet to inches and I'll tell you why
|
||
|
|
that works in a second so 12 inches divided by one foot is the left hand side and that's equal to
|
||
|
|
one foot divided by one foot which we know is equal to one feet cancel with feet one canceled with
|
||
|
|
one and I get one so that I know that 12 inches divided by one foot is equal to one now if I multiply
|
||
|
|
12 inches divided by one foot by any quantity that's in feet I'm multiplying let's say it's
|
||
|
|
three feet that I'm multiplying by that well the three feet times 12 inches over one foot is equal
|
||
|
|
to well just rearrange terms and I get 12 inches times three feet over one foot and feet cancel
|
||
|
|
up and down so I get a unitless value of three so then I can say 12 inches times three is 12 times
|
||
|
|
inches and I get 36 inches which I know is three feet because I've used the yardstick I know that
|
||
|
|
three feet is a yard and it's also 36 inches so that accords with what we already know it accords
|
||
|
|
with intuition and it uses very simple techniques like multiplying by one in a way that the unwanted
|
||
|
|
thing cancels out leaving you with the quantity the units that you want so let's use this in the
|
||
|
|
problems that we've already talked about so let's say that I want to convert from feet two inches
|
||
|
|
and I want to go back to my problem how many inches in 10 feet well 10 feet is equal to 10 feet
|
||
|
|
times one which is equal to 10 feet times 12 inches over one foot which we know to be one because
|
||
|
|
we've just done that and that is 10 feet divided by one foot times 12 inches now feet cancel I get a
|
||
|
|
unitless number 10 so I can say that 12 inches times 10 is the same thing as 12 times 10
|
||
|
|
quantity inches and that's 120 inches which is what we had calculated before except that the
|
||
|
|
magic is gone it's all very systematic I start with the units I have I multiply by a factor
|
||
|
|
conversion factor which has the units I want upstairs the units I want to get rid of downstairs I get
|
||
|
|
cancellation and I'm left with a multiplication problem that's all in the unit that I want very cool
|
||
|
|
it it's hard to imagine getting that wrong now suppose I'd use the conversion factor that's
|
||
|
|
equal to the one I used except upside down so that I multiply 10 feet my starting point and that's
|
||
|
|
equal to 10 feet times one equal to 10 feet times one foot over 12 inches and what that is is 10
|
||
|
|
square feet divided by 12 inches so it's 10 12 so the square foot thing divided by an inch what is
|
||
|
|
that well the equation is actually correct but it's stupid because it's not in a unit that I want
|
||
|
|
and that I can interpret now if I put in enough conversion factors to cancel out the square feet
|
||
|
|
and put inches back and everything I would get the right answer but I know that I'm I know that I'm
|
||
|
|
doing something wrong when I put in this conversion factor because the units are crazy they're
|
||
|
|
not what I want so I know the number can't be right unless some really big coincidence where
|
||
|
|
everything I don't want cancels but so when I use the form of that conversion factor where the
|
||
|
|
units don't cancel each other I can't know what I'm looking at I can't tell whether I'm right
|
||
|
|
because my units are wrong so I can't just look at the number and check it I can't just multiply
|
||
|
|
numbers blindly I need to look at the units so it actually helps you to carry the the units along
|
||
|
|
so that you know whether you're multiplying or dividing by that 12 because what you're really
|
||
|
|
multiplying by in this case is not 12 you are multiplying by one foot divided by 12 inches
|
||
|
|
that's why you couldn't say that's 10-12 of an inch is 10 feet no it's 10-12 of the ratio of
|
||
|
|
square feet to inches so that if you don't get what you want in the units on the right hand side
|
||
|
|
when you have done all your cancelling go back and check your conversion factors and make sure
|
||
|
|
that you apply them correctly when you do that you can unwind all this stuff and get to the right
|
||
|
|
answer answer that you want in the units that you want so here's brilliant insight number two when
|
||
|
|
you use unit conversion factor you can help your cause by carrying along both sets of units in the
|
||
|
|
form of a fraction as you are writing down your your problem if the right hand side of the equation
|
||
|
|
doesn't have the units that you were looking for your numerical answer is almost certainly wrong
|
||
|
|
now what can we derive from that well the implication is that to convert units of distance
|
||
|
|
you need to multiply by a conversion factor that's in the form x target units divided by y original
|
||
|
|
units because when you do that and you write the conversion factor out in its full fractional form
|
||
|
|
with the units and you carry out all the multiplications and cancellations you can see whether you've
|
||
|
|
got the right answer whether you've done it right it makes it hard to do the wrong calculation
|
||
|
|
because you have this crazy set of units on the other side that tell you that you've done something
|
||
|
|
that didn't make sense this is going to revolutionize your life if you've always depended on
|
||
|
|
calling someone who's good at math to do unit conversions for you because if you do it this way
|
||
|
|
and the units match you're good if you've got the wrong number it's because you did the wrong
|
||
|
|
arithmetic and that's easy to check if your units are not right you're solving the wrong problem
|
||
|
|
now the equation may still be correct because you may have done all the multiplications but it's not
|
||
|
|
expressed in the units you want so it's not very useful so let's use this the same system to solve
|
||
|
|
the second example i wanted to convert six hundred and sixty inches to feet so i start with six
|
||
|
|
hundred and sixty inches which is equal to six hundred and sixty inches times one i multiply that by
|
||
|
|
the fraction one foot divided by twelve inches because i'm cleverly setting myself up to be able to
|
||
|
|
cancel inches with inches and be left with feet that's why i put feet on top that's the one i want
|
||
|
|
at the end inches on the bottom that's the one i want to cancel and i think i'm gonna get the right
|
||
|
|
answer when i just multiply through the numbers and cancel the units and that's exactly what happens
|
||
|
|
when we rearrange terms this whole thing on the the second step putting in the conversion factor
|
||
|
|
can be rearranged so they've got the original number six hundred and sixty inches i was multiplying by
|
||
|
|
one foot over twelve inches so i can put that twelve inches directly under the six hundred and sixty
|
||
|
|
inches and then all i'm left with some multiplying by one foot oh that looks good because it's clear
|
||
|
|
when i've got inches over inches that those cancel and i get an unit list number that's six hundred
|
||
|
|
and sixty divided by twelve and that ratio that answer six sixty by divided by twelve which is
|
||
|
|
fifty five is now multiplied by one foot so it's clear that that fifty five times one foot is
|
||
|
|
fifty five feet and feel pretty confident that that's probably the answer if i did the division
|
||
|
|
of those two numbers correctly at least i know i'm in feet so this gives you a real sense of
|
||
|
|
confidence which you're going to need because sometimes you don't have direct conversion factors
|
||
|
|
and you have to actually combine sets of factors may have to take one conversion step using one
|
||
|
|
identity a second one using a second conversion factor maybe even the third conversion factor
|
||
|
|
but if you do this step by step by step aiming for conversion factors that cancel out units you don't
|
||
|
|
want and put in units you do to go to the next step you will zero in on the right answer in the
|
||
|
|
proper units and if you carry the units along with it you're much more likely to get the right answer
|
||
|
|
or at least you have done the right process so that you can go back over your arithmetic and make
|
||
|
|
sure that it wasn't some silly mistake that you made along the way you're like calling nine times
|
||
|
|
six fifty six instead of fifty four that that kind of mistake you can fix because you can see
|
||
|
|
how you did okay great so i just have to check some arithmetic that's much easier than determining
|
||
|
|
at each step do i divide or do i multiply because that gives you two choices to make on every
|
||
|
|
conversion factor you use if you had to use four of them then you've got sixteen combinations to
|
||
|
|
try you don't want to go down that road make your life easier carry the units and you'll see that
|
||
|
|
you can convert between units of distance and we're going to get into area in just a minute and
|
||
|
|
you can do this with confidence says great okay that's it for today's show you back with more
|
||
|
|
practical math and more units here on hacker public radio thanks for listening bye
|
||
|
|
you have been listening to hacker public radio or hacker public radio does our
|
||
|
|
we are a community podcast network that releases shows every weekday on day through Friday
|
||
|
|
today's show like all our shows was contributed by a hbr listener like yourself
|
||
|
|
if you ever consider recording a podcast then visit our website to find out how easy it really is
|
||
|
|
hacker public radio was founded by the digital dot pound and the infonomicum computer cloud
|
||
|
|
hbr is funded by the binary revolution at binref dot com all binref projects are proudly sponsored
|
||
|
|
by linear pages from shared hosting to custom private clouds go to lunar pages dot com for all
|
||
|
|
your hosting needs unless otherwise stasis today's show is released under a creative comments
|
||
|
|
attribution share a life he does own life
|