Update metadata and transcripts upto mid November 2025
This commit is contained in:
211
hpr_transcripts/hpr4484.txt
Normal file
211
hpr_transcripts/hpr4484.txt
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,211 @@
|
||||
Episode: 4484
|
||||
Title: HPR4484: When Your Dentist Uses ChatControl Logic
|
||||
Source: https://hub.hackerpublicradio.org/ccdn.php?filename=/eps/hpr4484/hpr4484.mp3
|
||||
Transcribed: 2025-11-22 14:55:23
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
This is Hacker Public Radio Episode 4484 for Thursday 9 October 2025.
|
||||
Today's show is entitled, When Your Dentist Uses Chat Control Logic.
|
||||
It is hosted by Troler Coaster and is about 14 minutes long.
|
||||
It carries a clean flag.
|
||||
The summary is, Troler Coaster alerts us to the dangers of the proposed EU chat control
|
||||
legislation.
|
||||
So here I am, sitting in the waiting room with a mildly annoying toothache, nothing
|
||||
got a shruffick, just one of those dull throbs that tells you something's going on in there
|
||||
that could turn nasty if ignored.
|
||||
The receptionist calls my name, and I walk into Dr. Chat Control's office.
|
||||
The dentist greets me with a concerned expression.
|
||||
I've reviewed your case, he says gravely, and many others.
|
||||
Toothaches are a serious problem.
|
||||
Did you know that in 2023 alone, at least 111,988 people in Europe experienced a dental
|
||||
pain that's over 60% of all global complaints traced to this region.
|
||||
Okay, I say, but I just need you to take a look at this one tooth.
|
||||
This is an epidemic interrupts, and we can't just treat symptoms anymore.
|
||||
We need a comprehensive mandatory risk assessment.
|
||||
Dr. Chat Control pulls out a 47-page questionnaire.
|
||||
First we assess the risk that your mouth might develop cavities, gum disease, or oral cancer
|
||||
he explained.
|
||||
This applies to everyone, regardless of whether they have symptoms.
|
||||
But I have symptoms, I say, this is why I'm here.
|
||||
Exactly, he says triumphantly.
|
||||
Which means your high risk.
|
||||
So we move on to phase 2 mitigation measures.
|
||||
He hands me a pamphlet titled safety by design for oral health.
|
||||
From now on, you need to implement parental control on your diet.
|
||||
Every candy will come with an age verification wrapper and user reporting mechanisms, so
|
||||
your teeth can flag potential problems and verify your age before consuming any hard
|
||||
foods.
|
||||
It's verification, I retort, but I'm 38.
|
||||
Perfect, he replies.
|
||||
That means you're old enough to consent to monitoring.
|
||||
Now, Dr. Chat Control continues, since your mitigation measures haven't been implemented
|
||||
yet, you just got here, I know, I'm authorized to issue a detection order.
|
||||
He holds up an official looking document with a judges signature.
|
||||
This allows me to scan not just the tooth that hurts, but your entire mouth and your
|
||||
sinuses, and your lymph nodes, and just to be thorough, everyone in the waiting room.
|
||||
Huh?
|
||||
Oh, hey, what?
|
||||
I blurt out.
|
||||
It's targeted.
|
||||
He assures me.
|
||||
We're only scanning high-risk areas, which, according to our independent EU dental
|
||||
center, is every tooth, every patient, all the time.
|
||||
But here's the clever part, Dr. Chat Control says.
|
||||
Pulling out what looks like a tiny sander strapped to an airbrush.
|
||||
Your enamel contains layers that currently block our view with regards to early detection
|
||||
of certain viruses.
|
||||
So we need to replace the enamel with an optimized layer that perfectly protects against
|
||||
currently known sugars and acids, but allows our government-approved detection equipment
|
||||
to inspect the content of your teeth.
|
||||
I'm flabbergasted.
|
||||
Oh, you want to weaken my enamel?
|
||||
Wow, only slightly.
|
||||
He said cheerfully.
|
||||
Just enough so that our scanner can monitor what's happening inside your teeth all the
|
||||
times.
|
||||
You'll feel much safer.
|
||||
And don't worry, the new enamel will still protect you from everything else.
|
||||
How is that possible?
|
||||
If you can penetrate it, I can't use the cautious.
|
||||
Well, factory-approved candies, for example, he says, repeatable candy manufacturers have
|
||||
agreed to respect the adapted enamel and not penetrate it.
|
||||
They've signed a treaty to use optimized sugars, okay?
|
||||
And the artisanal candies, I ask, he says, adjusting his glasses.
|
||||
Those are obviously illegal.
|
||||
Those criminals don't tend to honor treaties.
|
||||
So yeah, the adapted enamel will make your teeth more vulnerable to unauthorized cavity
|
||||
formation, bacterial attacks, and anyone who wants to exploit the fact that your natural
|
||||
protection has been replaced with enough to optimize version.
|
||||
So you're making my teeth less secure, I repeat?
|
||||
We're making them more observable, he corrects.
|
||||
With a slightly annoyed tone, that's a difference.
|
||||
Your teeth will still be protected, just not against us.
|
||||
Or hostile foreign candy shops.
|
||||
Or those criminal artisanal real sugar nuts.
|
||||
But you have no business there anyway.
|
||||
And they will definitely protect you against harms from law abiding candy.
|
||||
But I read like over 500 leading dentists signed a letter saying this would create massive
|
||||
vulnerabilities, I point out.
|
||||
Those dentists are thinking about long-term hygiene, but the chat controlled size dismissively.
|
||||
Besides, it's not a back door, if we're replacing the front door with a tinted glass door,
|
||||
given all your citizens are law abiding, his tone gets stoner if he continues.
|
||||
Let me say more.
|
||||
If you refuse to upgrade your enamel, we will consider you a risk of dental terrorism.
|
||||
This is no longer about your teeth only, you must know.
|
||||
If you choose to blatantly ignore your teeth, you're a threat to society.
|
||||
But the whole reason I am here is because I care about my teeth.
|
||||
Dr. Holtzup is machine and asks, do you want me to treat you or to report you?
|
||||
Okay, whatever.
|
||||
It seems everybody is doing this.
|
||||
I don't want to be the outcast, crying wolf all the time, so I gave in.
|
||||
It's a relief, the procedure isn't painful.
|
||||
After completing the baseline scan, Dr. Chat Control frowns at the screen.
|
||||
Hmm, this is concerning, he says.
|
||||
The system has flagged 8,412 potential cavities.
|
||||
Huh?
|
||||
What?
|
||||
But I only have 32 teeth, I whimper.
|
||||
The detection algorithm works on a probabilistic model, he explains.
|
||||
Swiss dental authorities report that about 80% of automated cavity reports of our false
|
||||
positives, so we'll need to investigate all of them.
|
||||
But that still means 1,682 of those threats are real?
|
||||
I say.
|
||||
Which is still 1,682 too many, Dr. Chat Control blurs.
|
||||
Now I'll need to drill exploratory holes in every tooth, in your gums, your tongue,
|
||||
and just to be safe in your neighbor's mouth, because the system flagged them too, when
|
||||
they walked past the waiting room.
|
||||
But the disk seems insane.
|
||||
The math is solid, he insists.
|
||||
Again at 99.99% accuracy, which doesn't exist, we still generate 100,000 false dental
|
||||
alerts per day across Europe's 450 million people, but we can't let the cavities win.
|
||||
While Dr. Chat Control explains his flawless system, I notice how the tooth that is actually
|
||||
hurting, the one I came to fix, is starting to abscess.
|
||||
Dr. I say, pointing to the swelling.
|
||||
We'll get to that after we finish scanning everyone, he says dismissively.
|
||||
The important thing is that no cavity goes undetected, even if it means we spend all our
|
||||
time investigating healthy teeth.
|
||||
But the actual problem is getting worse, I say.
|
||||
That's because sophisticated cavities have learned to evade detection.
|
||||
Dr. Chat Control explains.
|
||||
They change their appearance slightly, maybe grow on the back of the tooth instead of
|
||||
the front, or hide under existing fillings, our algorithms can't catch those yet.
|
||||
But what about that letter from those 500 dentists?
|
||||
They also claim it's technically infeasible?
|
||||
Ah, they're just not thinking big enough, the doctor blocks my argument.
|
||||
So here's the treatment plan, Dr. Chat Control says, we're gonna install a permanent scanning
|
||||
device in your jaw that monitors every tooth, 24-7, and reports any suspicious activity
|
||||
to a centralized EU dental database.
|
||||
Ooh, that sounds like a massive security risk.
|
||||
Ah, not at all, here it applies.
|
||||
The device is encrypted, only our scanner can look behind your upgraded enamel.
|
||||
What leaves your tooth is already encrypted, so your privacy is intact.
|
||||
No other device than ours can read the data.
|
||||
What about those knock-offs you can buy on all the express?
|
||||
I ask.
|
||||
Ah, they don't work reliably.
|
||||
And also, why would hackers want access to your teeth, his coughed?
|
||||
Although, now that I think about it, the device itself could make a high-valuable target for
|
||||
malicious actors as they could abuse them to learn how to make knock-off candy that
|
||||
doesn't get detected by scanners.
|
||||
Things your natural enamel would obviously protect against, but let's not go there.
|
||||
By the way, Dr. Chat Control adds casually, dentists and dental workers in the EU are exempt
|
||||
from the scanning requirement under professional dental secrecy.
|
||||
So there they don't get monitored, I ask.
|
||||
Correct, he says.
|
||||
Our oral health is a matter of public trust.
|
||||
Yours, however, requires constant surveillance.
|
||||
Ah, isn't that like a double standard?
|
||||
Eh, it's a two-tire system for a two-tire society, here applies pleasantly.
|
||||
Now shall we proceed with installing the jaw monitor?
|
||||
By this point, my actual toothache is developing into a full-blown infection.
|
||||
The pain is incruciating.
|
||||
Dr. I need antibiotics and a root canal, I cry.
|
||||
No, we don't do target treatments anymore.
|
||||
Dr. Chat Control says, that's the old model.
|
||||
Now we focus on comprehensive mandatory monitoring.
|
||||
But I'm going to lose my tooth, I say, perhaps he acknowledges.
|
||||
But while we were scanning everyone in the waiting room, we found three people with slightly
|
||||
suspicious molars.
|
||||
They're perfectly healthy now.
|
||||
But they could develop cavity someday.
|
||||
That's three potential problems prevented.
|
||||
And preventing is always better than curing.
|
||||
But my problem actually needs curing, I point out, it's getting worse.
|
||||
Yeah, he admits.
|
||||
But we've invested so much in the scanning infrastructure that we can't really afford
|
||||
to do traditional dentistry anymore.
|
||||
The system needs to justify itself, you understand.
|
||||
Oh, but this isn't sane, I repeat.
|
||||
This is progress, he corrects me.
|
||||
As I'm leaving the office, still with my untreated, painful mouth and a jaw full of surveillance
|
||||
equipment, I notice the sign on the door, signal dental, orthodontic streamer, and brought
|
||||
on mouth care, have seized operations in the EU due to incompatibility with mandatory
|
||||
scanning requirements.
|
||||
Apparently, the dentists who actually know how to fix my teeth without installing spyware
|
||||
have all moved to Switzerland.
|
||||
Meanwhile, I hear the voice of Dr. Chad Control behind me in the waiting room announcing
|
||||
to everyone, we've successfully detected 6,847 potential cavities this week.
|
||||
And someone asks what he means by potential, he quietly answers, only 11 were real, but
|
||||
that's 11 teeth saved.
|
||||
The infection is still spreading, my mouth is throbbing, and I'll probably lose my tooth
|
||||
after all because nobody's actually treating it, but at least the healthy ones are under
|
||||
constant surveillance.
|
||||
Okay, so this was my story, I made fun of it, but it's not funny.
|
||||
I mean, it's about wasting loads of money on a noble goal in all the wrong ways.
|
||||
But next week, October 14th, the vote will be cast in the EU, so it's high time to reach
|
||||
out to your MEP and ask their stance if they're undecided, or their motivation if they're
|
||||
in favor.
|
||||
Go to fightchatcontrol.eu if you live in Europe.
|
||||
And don't forget if you don't live in Europe, this will also impact you because we can
|
||||
create encryption in mainstream products, we'll spread, and the weekend encryption will
|
||||
be used everywhere.
|
||||
So fightchatcontrol.eu, reach out to your MEPs if you're living in Europe, and make some
|
||||
fuss about it, please, because this isn't important.
|
||||
You have been listening to Hacker Public Radio, as Hacker Public Radio does work.
|
||||
Today's show was contributed by a HBR listener like yourself, if you ever thought of
|
||||
a quick podcast, and click on our contribute link to find out how easy it really is.
|
||||
Hosting for HBR has been kindly provided by an honesthost.com, the Internet Archive
|
||||
and our Sync.net.
|
||||
On the Sadois status, today's show is released on our Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
|
||||
License.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user