Initial commit: HPR Knowledge Base MCP Server
- MCP server with stdio transport for local use - Search episodes, transcripts, hosts, and series - 4,511 episodes with metadata and transcripts - Data loader with in-memory JSON storage 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
133
hpr_transcripts/hpr3600.txt
Normal file
133
hpr_transcripts/hpr3600.txt
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,133 @@
|
||||
Episode: 3600
|
||||
Title: HPR3600: Digitizing Photos
|
||||
Source: https://hub.hackerpublicradio.org/ccdn.php?filename=/eps/hpr3600/hpr3600.mp3
|
||||
Transcribed: 2025-10-25 02:01:04
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
This is Hacker Public Radio Episode 3600 for Friday, the 20th of May 2022.
|
||||
Tid's show is entitled, digitizing photos and is part of the series Gimpit is hosted by Ouka
|
||||
and is about 13 minutes long and carries a clean flag. The summary is how to digitize old prints,
|
||||
slides and negatives. This episode of HBR is brought to you by an honest host.com.
|
||||
Get 15% discount on all shared hosting with the offer code HBR15. That's HBR15.
|
||||
Better web hosting that's honest and fair at An Honesthost.com.
|
||||
Hello, this is Ouka. Welcome you to Hacker Public Radio and another exciting episode in our Gimp
|
||||
series. Today, what I want to talk about is how you get your physical photographs, prints,
|
||||
slides, negatives, etc. into the computer. That means digitizing them. That's going to be the topic
|
||||
of this particular tutorial. Gimp is a digital photo editing program. Step one is to have your
|
||||
photos in digital form. Of course, any photos you take with your cell phone or with most
|
||||
contemporary cameras is already digital, so that does not a problem. But when my wife and I
|
||||
went on a trip to San Francisco in early 79 or on our honeymoon in late 79, we're on our trip
|
||||
to England in 1981. We were shooting film and we had even older photos than those that have
|
||||
meaning to us in our memories. Many of those old photos have problems which we would like to fix
|
||||
and Gimp is a great tool for doing that, but first we have to get them into digital formats.
|
||||
There's a number of ways to do that. First of all, the simplest, if you have money and don't
|
||||
want to tackle it yourself, you can use a service. There's a lot of them.
|
||||
Now, a few years ago, I retrieved a cache of home movies that my father had shot over the years
|
||||
and took the films to a local service to have them transferred to a DVD. I could then make copies
|
||||
with my DVD burner drive, gave them to my mother, my brothers and sisters as Christmas presents.
|
||||
Digitizing movie film was not something I wanted to take on. And the money at cost was
|
||||
well worth it in this case, but there is definitely a cost. I went with the straight transfer
|
||||
option, no editing or retouching, and it crossed me several hundreds of dollars.
|
||||
Now, you can do the same thing for still photos, slides, and negatives, but you're trading money
|
||||
for time in that case. So, what are some of the options? I did looking around. I found a place
|
||||
called Top 10 Reviews. They did a review of what they considered the five best scanning services.
|
||||
And, of course, all of these links are in the show notes. They said that Scan Digital was the best
|
||||
overall service. Ever present, they said was the best for choice. Scan Cafe was the best value
|
||||
for money. Go Photo was the best A la carte scanning service. Digital Memories was the best for
|
||||
online storage, and Scan My Photos, the best for speed of service. Now, the links in the show notes,
|
||||
you can read the article from Top 10 Reviews, and then links to individual reviews, etc. So,
|
||||
there's lots of way to get more information here. So, they said, these were what Top 10 Reviews
|
||||
said about these services, because I have no particular experience of them. I'm just presenting
|
||||
this information as a service. Now, I did note that on the Go Photo site, it says that they're
|
||||
merging with Scan Cafe. So, this might be the top five sites by the time you're listening to this.
|
||||
Now, as for storage plan, I tend to talk about storage. My intent is to do that in the next
|
||||
tutorial. Now, in reviewing this list, I noticed that it really is entirely US-centric, but that
|
||||
may simply be Google is only showing me US companies because it knows I'm in the US.
|
||||
So, in other countries, you might want to try a little search for something like Best Photo
|
||||
Scanning Service if you want to go in this direction. But again, the general rule is you're spending
|
||||
money to avoid spending time and effort if you use a service. So, you are the best judge of what
|
||||
you have more of. Now, when you have more time than money, the best option is really to scan at
|
||||
home and you have a number of options here. Some of the options you use equipment you may already
|
||||
have. Others can use inexpensive equipment. Now, I want to stress that I'm talking about options
|
||||
on the home hobbyist level. I have no doubt that this sort of person who does photo shoots with
|
||||
thousands of dollars worth of equipment would not be interested in the stuff that I'm talking about.
|
||||
I'm addressing the person who may have a few albums of old photos or even, you know,
|
||||
the old shoebox full of photos who wants to preserve them and maybe share them with family and
|
||||
friends. You really can do this inexpensively and in some cases for free if you already have the
|
||||
equipment. Now, I'm going to look at situations based on the media, prints, slides, and negatives.
|
||||
Those are the big three. Now, in most cases, the output will be JPEG photos, but for most purposes,
|
||||
this is good enough, particularly if we're talking about photos a few decades or more old.
|
||||
My photos with my wife go back to the late 1970s, for instance, and the quality is a lot less than
|
||||
what I can get now on my Pixel 3a phone. But, they're still important to us.
|
||||
Now, prints. This is the easiest of all because you likely have some of the equipment already.
|
||||
Your first option is your cell phone. There's a good app available from Google
|
||||
and it's available both on Android and iPhone devices called Photoscan by Google Photos.
|
||||
I put a link in the show notes to a review by PC Magazine. You can look at it, but it really is
|
||||
pretty simple. There are other options as well, such as Snap Seed, Instagram, and EverNote.
|
||||
All of which can also give you digital copies of your prints.
|
||||
The nice thing is it's not just limited to photographs. Back when the sort of thing mattered to me,
|
||||
I had a huge stack of business cards and I decided to just scan them in using the EverNote app so
|
||||
that I could store them digitally and be less cluttered. That worked perfectly well.
|
||||
You could use one of these things to scan in some postcards, maybe some ticket stubs,
|
||||
what other memorabilia that you have that you might want to hang onto,
|
||||
or at least have an image of. With the quality of cameras and smartphones these days,
|
||||
that might be all you need. Since most people have a smartphone these days, it makes sense to try
|
||||
it first. Now, the other main option for prints and so on is of course a flatbed scanner.
|
||||
Now, you can spend a fortune for one, but you don't have to. The kind you have at home,
|
||||
if you have one at home, probably does a decent enough job. I've found them for about $100
|
||||
where I am. They can also, in some cases, scan negatives. I have to say my experience with this
|
||||
has not been very good. If you have a scanner that can do this, you can of course try it out and see
|
||||
what you get. Your experience may be better. Slides and negatives. I'm going to take these together
|
||||
because they're so similar. We have a lot of slides. Most of the photos from our honeymoon,
|
||||
for instance, are slides. I remember that early on I got a Christmas present from my wife.
|
||||
It was a slide projector because we had this idea somehow that we were going to be looking at
|
||||
these slides over and over again and sharing them with friends and family. Well, okay, that didn't
|
||||
happen. The slides got put into trays, stored away in a closet, and we're coming up on our
|
||||
42nd wedding anniversary in just a few months. I think a lot of those photos have been
|
||||
traced for 40 years without anyone looking at them. The problem with digitizing slides is that
|
||||
you really need some equipment to do it. Again, I've seen flatbed scanners with slide attachments
|
||||
that should scan them, but I'm going to say my experience has not been good. You could spend a
|
||||
lot of money for professional grade equipment, but for the home hobbyists, there are some very
|
||||
affordable options that still produce decent results. The nice thing is that they all let you
|
||||
digitize negatives and slides. You can tackle both of these things with one device.
|
||||
Now again, top 10 reviews had a nice round up. They looked at four different devices.
|
||||
Wolverine Titan 8 and 1 was, they said, the best slide to digital image converter overall.
|
||||
That was going for about 150.
|
||||
Digit now, film scanner, the best value converter, only $50.
|
||||
Sharper image, slide a negative converter, which is the most portable option, that's about
|
||||
$100, and the Kodak Scanza, which has the largest storage option, and that was about $160.
|
||||
Now, all of these prices are quoted from Amazon as of the time I'm writing this,
|
||||
may have changed by the time that this thing comes out on hacker public radio.
|
||||
Now, as before, the recommendations about each one are what top 10 reviews said about them.
|
||||
For my money, the sweet spot is the choice between Wolverine and Kodak.
|
||||
They're about the same price. They're both pretty good. I've seen a number of reviews online
|
||||
that directly put them head to head, which tells you something. The one I have is the Kodak Scanza,
|
||||
and I like it. I have no doubt the Wolverine is a fine product. The reviews all say so.
|
||||
I think I got the Scanza on sale a few years back. It works well with a variety of formats,
|
||||
including 35mm, 126, 110 slides, and negatives. Comes with a variety of plastic trays into which
|
||||
the film is loaded, and you move the slide into position manually and scan in the image.
|
||||
The photos are saved as JPEG images and stored on an SD card. The SD card is not included,
|
||||
and I always have SD cards around. I consider it office supplies.
|
||||
Now, the interface can be set for a variety of languages,
|
||||
and as you move the tray through the device, you can see the image and line it up the way you want.
|
||||
Now, of course, I plan to do the real editing in GIMP, but it is nice that you can start with a
|
||||
well framed image. In one feature that is nice is you can flip the image either horizontally or
|
||||
vertically. Now, I know GIMP can do that perfectly well, but it's nice to have that feature.
|
||||
Now, in my case, I have an inexpensive card reader with a USB plug, so after I've scanned in a bunch of
|
||||
photos from negatives or slides, I just take the card out, put it into my USB
|
||||
plug card reader and copy them onto my computer. So, the bottom line is that digitizing photos does
|
||||
not need to be really difficult or very expensive. The only expense I had that I would not otherwise
|
||||
have is buying the scans up. I would have my Pixel 3A in any case, and scanning photos is just a
|
||||
bonus. But once you've scanned in your photos, however you do it, you need to consider storage,
|
||||
safety, and related workflow issues. And that's going to be the next topic I address. So,
|
||||
this is a hook-up for hacker public radio signing off and is always encouraging you to support
|
||||
free software. Bye-bye.
|
||||
You've been listening to Hacker Public Radio at Hacker Public Radio. We are a community podcast
|
||||
network that releases shows every weekday, Monday through Friday. Today's show, like all our shows,
|
||||
was contributed by an HPR listener like yourself. If you ever thought of recording a podcast,
|
||||
then click on our contributing to find out how easy it really is. Hacker Public Radio was
|
||||
founded by the Digital Dove Pound and the Infonomicon Computer Club, and is part of the binary
|
||||
revolution at binrev.com. If you have comments on today's show, please email the host directly,
|
||||
leave a comment on the website, or record a follow-up episode yourself. Unless otherwise status,
|
||||
today's show is released on the Creative Commons, App Tribution, share a light, 3.0 license.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user