Initial commit: HPR Knowledge Base MCP Server
- MCP server with stdio transport for local use - Search episodes, transcripts, hosts, and series - 4,511 episodes with metadata and transcripts - Data loader with in-memory JSON storage 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
87
hpr_transcripts/hpr3917.txt
Normal file
87
hpr_transcripts/hpr3917.txt
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
|
||||
Episode: 3917
|
||||
Title: HPR3917: Response to "Permission Tickets" by oneofspoons
|
||||
Source: https://hub.hackerpublicradio.org/ccdn.php?filename=/eps/hpr3917/hpr3917.mp3
|
||||
Transcribed: 2025-10-25 07:53:03
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
This is Hacker Public Radio Episode 3,917 for Tuesday the 8th of August 2023.
|
||||
Today's show is entitled, Response to Permission Tickets by Own of Spoons.
|
||||
It is hosted by DNT, and is about seven minutes long.
|
||||
It carries a clean flag.
|
||||
The summary is, hopefully a useful provocation in response to a recent intriguing show by
|
||||
another HPR host.
|
||||
Hello and welcome to another exciting episode of Hacker Public Radio.
|
||||
This here is a response to 3909 called Permission Tickets by Own of Spoons.
|
||||
This was a really good show very well written, not too long, and one of Spoons says it's
|
||||
preview show for some future self-referential tangle of cryptographic distraction, which
|
||||
sounds great.
|
||||
I just wanted to, I was typing a comment, and then it was kind of getting long, so I decided
|
||||
to record a response show.
|
||||
You may notice that I was on Hacker Public Radio just a couple days ago, and tomorrow or
|
||||
something, I will be on it again, and that was because I had a scheduled show, and then
|
||||
one show came out of the reserve queue, and then I'm posting this as a response show,
|
||||
and I'll talk a little more about that later.
|
||||
The show by Own of Spoons was very good, very interesting stuff, I really recommend
|
||||
you listen to it, and it's very much in line with the previous shows by that host.
|
||||
It's always been at this kind of standard, and I wanted to talk about just one part of
|
||||
what he is talking about here, and that is, for example, at the end here, I'm looking
|
||||
at the whisper transcription, it says, so as a disclaimer, if it wasn't clear at the
|
||||
beginning, if you recognize that someone who exchanges a bunch of money for a bunch
|
||||
of cryptographic tokens is essentially holding next to nothing at all, then you are halfway
|
||||
to recognizing that someone who holds a bunch of money is holding next to nothing at all.
|
||||
What they need is to convince somebody to exchange or to swap for the permission tickets
|
||||
which they have acquired, end quote, that's very good, too many crypto fans don't recognize
|
||||
even that, but I would like to point out here that there is actually one very important
|
||||
difference between these cryptocurrencies and state-backed currencies, and that is that
|
||||
within that state it is legal tender in one of the primary ways in which this manifests
|
||||
is that the state accepts it for tax payment, so that's kind of the number one thing that
|
||||
gives state-backed money its value, right?
|
||||
It's not just that people will accept it, and this seems to be something that a lot of
|
||||
the crypto fans don't seem to remember, so the thing about that is that we seem to, in
|
||||
the 21st century, to be kind of in the habit of destroying things that we already had,
|
||||
and then just rebuilding them in a less good form, and then we're just stuck with this
|
||||
downgraded form of the thing that we actually already had.
|
||||
We just didn't realize that we were just rebuilding the same thing, only not as good
|
||||
as the one that we had before, right?
|
||||
This happens, I think, I'm going to put in the show notes this episode of the Harper's
|
||||
podcast where they discuss the riders' strike here in the United States, the Hollywood
|
||||
and riders' strike, and they kind of touched on the idea that these streaming services,
|
||||
they kind of destroyed the traditional TV industry in the US based in Hollywood, and they
|
||||
really didn't actually make anything new, they were simply allowed by the state to destroy
|
||||
the industry that already existed, and they just basically dominated it, and replaced
|
||||
it with an industry that's just much less equitable, and according to the person that
|
||||
was being interviewed on that podcast, this is now reflected in this strike.
|
||||
So I think we should be wary of situations in which we make, we kind of fool ourselves
|
||||
into thinking that we're innovating, we're building this new thing, but really we're
|
||||
just replacing it with an inferior version of something that we already had.
|
||||
Not because the thing that we already had was necessarily good, but just because we suffer
|
||||
from a pretty overwhelming lack of imagination, all right?
|
||||
So that was my comment on the show by One of Spoons, and before I posted this, I went
|
||||
on Matrix on the Matrix channel, and I raised this idea because I already had shows on
|
||||
the calendar, so we try to stick to only one show every two weeks so that nobody can kind
|
||||
of dominate the main feed, but I kind of raised the idea that maybe response shows should
|
||||
be exempt from that, because it's kind of nice for it to appear in the main feed pretty
|
||||
close to the show you're responding to, and also maybe that's a good way to fill
|
||||
slots, you know, to, we have the reserve queue when there's an unclaimed slot very close
|
||||
to the date it's supposed to air, so maybe another decent way for hosts to fill slots is
|
||||
to record a response show like the one I just did.
|
||||
Also personally, I'm a fan of these conversations, and this can be kind of like a play by male
|
||||
conversation where each participant in the conversation will only speak after several
|
||||
days, so with this I invite One of Spoons to write, to post a comment on my comment, or
|
||||
just post that upcoming show about the, the tangle of cryptographic something or other,
|
||||
so that could also be a good way for a new host to post their first show, you know, if
|
||||
you have some, if you have a comment about a show or thoughts about a show which undoubtedly
|
||||
you do from time to time, maybe it can be kind of a simple way to post your first show
|
||||
by sort of remixing or starting from somebody else's show, and what did you think about
|
||||
that?
|
||||
I think I would like to hear it, hopefully this was useful, thanks again to One of Spoons
|
||||
for the show, I'm looking forward to more, that was very good, very well done, thank you,
|
||||
and now please come back tomorrow for another exciting episode of Hacker Public Radio, thank
|
||||
you.
|
||||
You have been listening to Hacker Public Radio, as Hacker Public Radio does work, today's
|
||||
show was contributed by a HBR listener like yourself, if you ever thought of recording
|
||||
broadcast, you click on our contribute link to find out how easy it really is, hosting
|
||||
for HBR has been kindly provided by an onsthost.com, the internet archive and our sings.net.
|
||||
On this otherwise stated, today's show is released under Creative Commons, Attribution
|
||||
4.0 International License.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user