- MCP server with stdio transport for local use - Search episodes, transcripts, hosts, and series - 4,511 episodes with metadata and transcripts - Data loader with in-memory JSON storage 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
208 lines
12 KiB
Plaintext
208 lines
12 KiB
Plaintext
Episode: 2470
|
|
Title: HPR2470: Obamacare Update At The End Of 2017
|
|
Source: https://hub.hackerpublicradio.org/ccdn.php?filename=/eps/hpr2470/hpr2470.mp3
|
|
Transcribed: 2025-10-19 03:45:35
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
This is HPR episode 2470 entitled Oba Makarab, made at the end of 2017.
|
|
It is hosted by AYUKA and in about 13 minutes long and carry a clean flag.
|
|
The summary is where in US healthcare policy as we head into 2018.
|
|
This episode of HPR is brought to you by archive.org.
|
|
Support universal access to all knowledge by heading over to archive.org forward slash donate.
|
|
Hello, this is AYUKA, welcoming you to another exciting episode of Hacker Public Radio.
|
|
And I'm going to give a kind of a year end look at what is happening with healthcare
|
|
in the United States, because there's been a few things since I ended my previous look.
|
|
So since we did our analysis of how Obamacare works, there has been a lot of activity in
|
|
Washington, D.C., but in fact relatively little change.
|
|
Now literally from the day the bill was passed, the Republican Party in the United States
|
|
made it their top priority to repeal it and said so at every opportunity.
|
|
Of course as long as Obamacare was president, they could not do it since they never had
|
|
enough votes to override his veto.
|
|
They passed repeal bills annually, if not more often, but none of them went anywhere.
|
|
But when the Republican candidate Donald Trump won a surprise victory in the 2016 election,
|
|
there was no longer anything to stop them.
|
|
Trump had run on among other things, promising to repeal Obamacare.
|
|
And from the moment he was inaugurated, he proclaimed his signature pen was ready as soon
|
|
as a bill was passed.
|
|
And that is when things got tricky for the Republicans.
|
|
As you may recall from our previous analysis, Obamacare was a finely balanced combination
|
|
of measures that had at least something that each party wanted.
|
|
And as the Republicans started trying to craft measures to repeal the legislation, opponents
|
|
of all kinds came out of the woodwork.
|
|
It turned out insurance companies favored keeping it, the majority of doctors favored
|
|
keeping it, the people who were insured favored keeping it, and even some Republicans turned
|
|
out to have reservations about repeal.
|
|
So let's look at these.
|
|
First of all, insurance companies.
|
|
The insurance companies had done reasonably well out of Obamacare since it provided an
|
|
increased number of people they could insure and make money from.
|
|
They had made all of the adjustments they needed to make by 2017, and now saw the Obamacare
|
|
landscape as a known environment that they could make money in.
|
|
Repeal would take them in the realm of the unknown because it would inevitably mean something
|
|
different from just returning to the status quo ante of 2008.
|
|
Doctors.
|
|
Okay, majority of physicians wanted to keep Obamacare because they'd increase their
|
|
pool of customers.
|
|
The American Medical Association came out in strong opposition to the repeal of Obamacare.
|
|
Hospitals.
|
|
They opposed the repeal because it would make their financing more fragile, among other
|
|
things, hospitals liked Obamacare because it significantly reduced their cost for what
|
|
is called uncompensated care.
|
|
That is, patients who receive care but cannot pay for it.
|
|
They did this in two ways.
|
|
First, more people with insurance policies purchased through the exchanges, meant in
|
|
essence more paying customers.
|
|
Second, Obamacare included a provision for individual states to expand Medicaid, which
|
|
is the program for providing health care to people to poor to afford coverage on their
|
|
own.
|
|
This Medicaid expansion was very significant since it provided coverage to the very people
|
|
most likely to receive uncompensated care in the absence of this program.
|
|
And patients.
|
|
The majority of patients liked Obamacare by the time we got to 2017 and that made repealing
|
|
it more difficult.
|
|
This increase in support was slow but consistent from the initial passage in 2010 when on balance
|
|
more opposed than supported it to 2017 where that was reversed.
|
|
I think the best explanation for this is that as people saw how the program worked, they
|
|
could see the benefit and learned that some of the overblown rhetoric like charges about
|
|
death panels was not really true.
|
|
Finally, the state governments.
|
|
Many states had expanded Medicaid under Obamacare and did not want to give up that benefit.
|
|
This even included a number of states under Republican government, such as the state
|
|
of Ohio, that essentially broke with their Republican colleagues over this.
|
|
This is something that would complicate the repeal process all year.
|
|
So with all of this opposition, why was the repeal being pursued at all?
|
|
Normally, you would expect a measure this unpopular to be quietly dropped, but that
|
|
is not what happened at all.
|
|
It was pursued with an intensity that was really quite remarkable.
|
|
But it would appear that several factors were at play here.
|
|
First the Republican Party had made this the centerpiece of their platform for eight years.
|
|
They had elevated this to the status of a moral crusade against evil and sold that idea
|
|
to their constituents and were now expected to deliver to their base.
|
|
One useful way to look at the election of 2016 was that it was a reaction against politicians
|
|
who say one thing to get elected, but do something different once they are in office.
|
|
Because the Republican politicians had made this so central to their election platform,
|
|
they felt compelled to deliver.
|
|
As Dave Bratt, a Republican member of Congress said, and I quote,
|
|
if we don't get health care, none of us are coming back.
|
|
He said in a brief interview,
|
|
we said, for seven years, you're going to repeal Obamacare.
|
|
It's nowhere near repealed.
|
|
Now, I've got a number of quotes in this, and there will be links in the show notes to news articles.
|
|
You can see where I got all of this from.
|
|
You can look up the articles if you're interested.
|
|
Now, the next reason has to do with donors who fund the Republican Party.
|
|
They had made it clear that either the Republicans delivered,
|
|
or they could forget getting campaign contributions.
|
|
For instance, a major Koch network donor in Texas named Doug Deeson said,
|
|
get Obamacare repealed and replaced, get tax reform passed.
|
|
Deeson said in a pointed message to GOP leaders, you control the Senate,
|
|
you control the House, you have the presidency.
|
|
There is no reason you can't get this done.
|
|
Get it done and we'll open it back up.
|
|
And the it he's referring to is the checkbook.
|
|
So they will open the checkbook once the Republicans deliver.
|
|
So they hit their marching orders and they tried.
|
|
First, the House of Representatives pulled a bill together in the spring.
|
|
Paul Ryan pulled it from the floor on March 24th because he did not have the votes.
|
|
The bill was being opposed by centrists who said it went too far
|
|
and by conservatives who said it did not go far enough.
|
|
Then they came back to it and a couple of months later,
|
|
they managed to pass a bill and send it to the Senate.
|
|
Now, that opened a different can of worms.
|
|
Since the Republicans in the Senate had a very narrow 52 to 48 majority
|
|
and would face a democratic filibuster.
|
|
So they had to use a special parliamentary provision called reconciliation
|
|
that would let them pass the measure on a strict majority of just 51 votes
|
|
instead of the 60 votes that's required to defeat a filibuster.
|
|
Now, that was possible but only under restrictive circumstances
|
|
that meant that the bill they got from the House would not work.
|
|
So they started on their own bill designed to repeal and replace
|
|
but that got shot down when several Republican senators said they opposed the measure.
|
|
Then they came back again and said, all right, you don't like repeal and replace.
|
|
Let's just do a straight repeal.
|
|
And then that failed on July 28th when three senators opposed the bill.
|
|
Then they came back to it again in September with one more effort.
|
|
And again, three senators opposed it and by now they had run out of time.
|
|
Reconciliation had to be completed by September 30th and they just ran out of calendar.
|
|
Then in the tax bill that they went to after this,
|
|
they did the one thing that actually had some popularity
|
|
and now it's to eliminate the individual mandate that said people had to either purchase insurance or pay a fine.
|
|
The US Supreme Court had ruled that this was a tax
|
|
and that made it practical to repeal and a tax measure.
|
|
So that aspect of Obamacare has been removed.
|
|
So where are we at the end of 2017?
|
|
Well, first and perhaps most important,
|
|
Obamacare is still more popular than you might think from all of the Republican rhetoric.
|
|
The Trump administration cut the enrollment period in half,
|
|
cut the publicity budget by 90%
|
|
and still enrollments were very healthy.
|
|
8.8 million people signed up through the federal marketplace
|
|
and that was only 4% below the 2016 number
|
|
when they had twice as much time and a lot more publicity.
|
|
But how will the repeal of the individual mandate affect the marketplace?
|
|
Well, the fear is that we could have a real problem of adverse selection.
|
|
Younger, healthier people might opt to go without insurance
|
|
and then as soon as they have a serious injury or illness, sign up for it.
|
|
The Obamacare provision that prevents companies from denying coverage
|
|
for pre-existing conditions is still the law
|
|
and this could lead to premiums that skyrocket.
|
|
Paradoxically, repealing this measure has caused the federal government's healthcare bill to go up
|
|
and the reason is as premiums increase,
|
|
the subsidies paid on behalf of low income people also increase.
|
|
So the government ends up paying more.
|
|
You know, there's no free lunch in any of this stuff.
|
|
Someone somewhere is paying the bills.
|
|
The argument is really over who it will be.
|
|
Now, and this is my personal view, it is shared by many people,
|
|
is that the Republicans are, despite what they think,
|
|
pushing us in the direction of a completely government-funded healthcare system,
|
|
though to what degree it resembles any of the other systems used in other countries
|
|
is yet to be determined.
|
|
It probably won't be exactly like any of them.
|
|
But then, you know, healthcare in England and healthcare in France and healthcare in Canada
|
|
are three different systems, even though all of them are basically government-funded.
|
|
So why do I say that we're being pushed this way?
|
|
Well, I'm a quote from Paul Waldman who said,
|
|
but those with low incomes will be getting free or low-cost insurance courtesy of the government,
|
|
which everyone else will continue to notice.
|
|
We wind up with a system made up of one,
|
|
people who get coverage from the government and are happy with it.
|
|
Two, people who get coverage from their employers and like the coverage,
|
|
but don't like the cost.
|
|
Three, a small number of people who pay the full cost of private coverage,
|
|
which is increasingly unaffordable.
|
|
And four, people who are uninsured and wish they could get on a government plan
|
|
such as Medicare or Medicaid.
|
|
So I think in the final analysis, Obamacare was the most moderate plan
|
|
the Republicans could hope to get, and they rejected it.
|
|
It was devised by Republicans initially,
|
|
although they frequently deny that, but you know, study your history.
|
|
This was the Heritage Foundation plan from 1993 initially.
|
|
It was implemented by a Republican governor,
|
|
and it was the alternative to anything more radical.
|
|
But I think we will see the more radical solutions going forward.
|
|
Bernie Sanders put down a marker in the 2016 race,
|
|
and you will certainly see Democratic candidates putting forth plans
|
|
that move us to single payer as they jockey for position in the 2020 race.
|
|
And so this is a hookah signing off,
|
|
and as always reminding you to support FreeSoftware.
|
|
Bye, bye.
|
|
You've been listening to Hacker Public Radio at HackerPublicRadio.org.
|
|
We are a community podcast network that releases shows every weekday,
|
|
Monday through Friday.
|
|
Today's show, like all our shows,
|
|
was contributed by an HPR listener like yourself.
|
|
If you ever thought of recording a podcast,
|
|
then click on our contributing to find out how easy it really is.
|
|
Hacker Public Radio was founded by the Digital Dog Pound
|
|
and the Infonomicom Computer Club,
|
|
and is part of the binary revolution at binrev.com.
|
|
If you have comments on today's show,
|
|
please email the host directly,
|
|
leave a comment on the website,
|
|
or record a follow-up episode yourself.
|
|
Unless otherwise status,
|
|
today's show is released under Creative Commons,
|
|
Attribution, ShareLife, 3.0 license.
|