- MCP server with stdio transport for local use - Search episodes, transcripts, hosts, and series - 4,511 episodes with metadata and transcripts - Data loader with in-memory JSON storage 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
880 lines
38 KiB
Plaintext
880 lines
38 KiB
Plaintext
Episode: 3529
|
|
Title: HPR3529: Linux Inlaws S01E48: Year Two of the Five Year Plan
|
|
Source: https://hub.hackerpublicradio.org/ccdn.php?filename=/eps/hpr3529/hpr3529.mp3
|
|
Transcribed: 2025-10-25 01:03:28
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
This is Haka Public Radio Episode 3529 for the first 8th of February 2022.
|
|
Today's show is entitled, Live XinLos S0148, Year 2 of the 5 year Black and this part of
|
|
the series, Live XinLos, it is hosted by Monochrome, and is about 52 minutes long, and carries
|
|
an explicit flag, for summaries, for two aging heroes discussed the past year in review.
|
|
This is Linux in Laws, a podcast on topics around free and open source software,
|
|
an associated contraband, communism, the revolution in general, and whatever fences your tickle.
|
|
Please note that this and other episodes may contain strong language, offensive humor,
|
|
and other certainly not politically correct language you have been warned.
|
|
Our parents insisted on this disclaimer. Happy mum!
|
|
Thus, the content is not suitable for consumption in the workplace, especially when played back
|
|
in an open plan office or similar environments. Any minors under the age of 35 or any pets including
|
|
fluffy little killer bunnies, you trust the guide dog, a lesson speed, and QT Rexes or other
|
|
associated dinosaurs.
|
|
This is Linux in Laws. Again, the review of the 5 year plan, and this would be season 1 episode
|
|
for the 8. Welcome to the review as in the second year of the 5 year plan episode. Martin Howard
|
|
thinks. Yeah, good question. What happened to your Russian? Well, I haven't practiced it for
|
|
a while. I think at least 10, no more than 10 years.
|
|
What is your question on last year's 5 year plan episode? I can't recall it well.
|
|
Okay, well done, me. A lot has happened in that year, which seems my 10 years.
|
|
Yes, for the people who are listening, for the two people who are listening to Linux in Laws for
|
|
the first time, we are doing this small as every year for the last 20 years. The intention is actually
|
|
to review where we are. Let's talk about a little bit about the road ahead, and of course, maybe
|
|
let's pass the year in review. A concept that we blatantly stole from a few other podcasts.
|
|
The Granpeo Court has probably been the best example, but more on the Granpeo case later.
|
|
More on Granpeo. They are many Granpeas, yes.
|
|
Okay. Martin, what's your 5 year plan episode of the last year then?
|
|
Oh, there's quite a few. Let's have a think, because I think probably, actually, you know, that's
|
|
an easy one, because the one with Paul Ramsey stood out for me. Okay, why is that?
|
|
Because of his approach to open source, right?
|
|
Okay. What approach his endeavours and talks around it, the kind of stuff he's,
|
|
he's obviously been in that area for a long time, but he's thought about it a lot, and
|
|
indeed, it has a kind of a high level view of how open source should work and could work and
|
|
it doesn't, at the moment, as we know. Very enough. Certainly food for thought indeed, yes.
|
|
Well, by yourself then, which one do you like? I'm still divided between the BSD and the
|
|
Lenin's panel episode. You probably remember the one where we had the Lenin's chronicle
|
|
derivatives on the on the panel, as well as the BSD ones. And I'm a slightly
|
|
slanted towards the BSD one, because they provided some food for thought indeed.
|
|
Because if you, if you recall this, they essentially hinted at the fact that GPL
|
|
Martin, that the GPL, as in the group public license, might not be one's house fits all,
|
|
especially for their purposes. Granted, for enough, they are coming from a different background,
|
|
because the BSD distribution license is a very liberal license, whereas in the GNU public license,
|
|
referring back to the episode that we did over the summer, people, if you can't get to sleep,
|
|
probably references will be shown on the map. We did it. Exactly. We did a show on
|
|
open source licensing. So for all these, for all the insomniacs out there for you, among you,
|
|
rather, and this is the episode to listen to, because you'll be asleep in no time. Jokes aside,
|
|
the GNU public license, as probably quite a few of our listeners will know, the GNU public licenses
|
|
is essentially a very strict license when it comes down to publishing any changes that you do,
|
|
to a code base, whereas, and this is considered to be a very strong copy-left license,
|
|
whereas the BSDs of the world would be considered to be more liberal licenses,
|
|
that do not have that limitation restriction, whatever you want to call it. So the idea behind
|
|
BSD and some other liberal licenses, as you take the code, you give it some attribution,
|
|
and then you are free to do whatever you do, whatever you see fit with the code base.
|
|
So, and this is essentially what we discussed you in that panel that quite a few
|
|
use cases or adoption references that we're looking for. In that space, go back to the fact that
|
|
this licensing is way more liberal than the Linuxes of the world, because, as we all probably know,
|
|
the Linux kernel is under GPF version 3, meaning whatever you put into it, you have to publish.
|
|
Okay. Yeah. I don't know until, yeah, it's for me down the licensing bit is all bit.
|
|
It's obviously relevant, but not the most exciting of topics.
|
|
I mean, if you, like we are, if you have that ultimate goal of world domination,
|
|
there are a couple of ways to achieve this, right?
|
|
Probably more than a couple, but yeah.
|
|
So, of course, the question is how to get there.
|
|
And that's exactly where the, where they kind of wrote up if you will divide.
|
|
No, I think the answer is probably not without the source of it.
|
|
It remains, that remains to be seen, I suppose, because quite a few companies are pretty much ahead
|
|
using open source towards that goal, towards that end goal, if you will.
|
|
Google, for example, comes to mind.
|
|
Yeah, I guess they might be using it, but I think, what did I actually, how big is Google
|
|
compared to Amazon, right? It's pretty minute market cap. Good question, don't know, but
|
|
I just came across something that said today, when I was reading the paper, that said
|
|
Google's market cap is at least the equivalent of a handful of Dex companies combined.
|
|
And Dex would be the German equivalent of Dow Jones or another kind of stock market index.
|
|
So, the market cap of alphabet must be significant.
|
|
You'll find this quite funny. So, Google's valuation for last year was like 2000 billion.
|
|
You mean alphabet or you mean Google, there's a difference.
|
|
Yeah, okay, sorry.
|
|
I'm talking about the umbrella group now, as in alphabet.
|
|
We could look at that.
|
|
Alphabet, the umbrella group is 2,000 billion almost.
|
|
Now, in comparison, Amazon is 1.7 trillion.
|
|
Seriously?
|
|
Yeah.
|
|
Not just AWS.
|
|
No, it's all books as well, remember?
|
|
Yeah, they do indeed.
|
|
This is where they're, yeah, this is where they come from.
|
|
So, yeah, there you have it.
|
|
If you want, well, the donations start selling books.
|
|
That's interesting. Just look at the Wikipedia pages and Amazon,
|
|
with regards to revenue loan clocks in,
|
|
and with nearly 400 billion last year,
|
|
I'll show that clocks a little bit at 182.
|
|
That's less than half of it.
|
|
Interesting, interesting perspective.
|
|
Because I thought that alphabet was bigger than Amazon, apparently, I'm wrong.
|
|
Both in terms of market cap as what is revenue, of course.
|
|
Well, they don't have some nuts for running it,
|
|
and they don't have anybody firing rockets in the space either,
|
|
so obviously they're doing something wrong.
|
|
Are you sure in terms of revenue?
|
|
Because, yes, Alan would be very rich,
|
|
but I don't think that Tesla would be anywhere near these numbers.
|
|
No, not yet, but I'm sure he'll have something up his sleeve,
|
|
or to change all that.
|
|
Well, I mean, SpaceX is still experimental.
|
|
I mean, they're putting rockets into space,
|
|
but I think they're still kind of,
|
|
they still have to get to the commercial breakthrough.
|
|
I don't think they're black at them, or more of a hobby,
|
|
and if we could be as anything to go by,
|
|
the revenue, have a guess, what do you think is the last year's revenue of Tesla?
|
|
Well, it's got to be in the
|
|
millions, millions, probably 100 billion.
|
|
No, less than that, 31, 35, 31 or five.
|
|
So people out there buy about Tesla's,
|
|
if you want to, of course, for disclosure, we don't own Tesla,
|
|
we are not participating in Tesla.
|
|
Our names are not Elon Musk.
|
|
I'm just saying, indeed.
|
|
Okay, going back to much more important topics.
|
|
Oh, yes.
|
|
The something called Linux-LOS, I don't know if that rings well,
|
|
it's some sort of open source podcast,
|
|
if a completely mistaken.
|
|
Well, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no,
|
|
the open source podcast, right?
|
|
Sorry, yes, of course,
|
|
we are talking about the five-year plan.
|
|
You're sorry.
|
|
Yes, you'd be glad to know Martin that actually,
|
|
and we are ahead of production,
|
|
so I think we now have five listeners.
|
|
That makes us one listener ahead of, of, of, of, of current planning.
|
|
Because, oh, no, no, no, no, we don't just have listeners,
|
|
we are also unusual, apparently.
|
|
Yes, indeed, we are.
|
|
Somebody is scraping us on YouTube.
|
|
I don't know how you got that.
|
|
Is that allowed?
|
|
Yes, I'm, I'm, I'm that sure it is.
|
|
Okay.
|
|
Well, yes and no, yes, but, right, because.
|
|
I mean, if it, if it isn't Sundar,
|
|
if you're listening, Mr. Pichai,
|
|
please get in touch with your,
|
|
we'll be at and saw this out.
|
|
No, I mean, jokes aside, we are releasing
|
|
under share, under, under creative comments,
|
|
share like attribution,
|
|
so everybody basically can take the content
|
|
and do whatever they want with it.
|
|
This is true.
|
|
So, yes.
|
|
So, we cannot see you Google or sorry,
|
|
YouTube or whatever these days,
|
|
or whatever it's called these days.
|
|
And so, if you're listening,
|
|
don't worry, we won't see you because we count.
|
|
But, if you want to send us money,
|
|
Sundar, the email address is sponsored
|
|
and it's in lots of you.
|
|
Yes, we do take more because it's not working.
|
|
No, Sundar, we do take shares as well.
|
|
So, so, if you don't want to send us cash,
|
|
then it's okay.
|
|
Good plan, good plan, action.
|
|
Okay, we will be.
|
|
Yeah, breakthroughs.
|
|
Of course, yes, I think our listener base
|
|
has now increased to a total of five listeners.
|
|
Maybe even more.
|
|
Does that include you, I mean?
|
|
No, I think that doesn't include you, I mean.
|
|
Okay, well, at least seven, then.
|
|
Speaking of which, there's another episode
|
|
that comes to mind, of course,
|
|
Hacker Public Radio with Ken Fallon.
|
|
Mm-hmm.
|
|
Yep.
|
|
Yeah, that's good as well.
|
|
And, well, this is it, right?
|
|
You have to choose one to come to say,
|
|
well, they're all good because they are, but...
|
|
Well, yes, it's a word clap.
|
|
Yeah.
|
|
But, actually, no, no, no.
|
|
Instead of communism, they all win.
|
|
Okay, fair enough.
|
|
Use the ones who didn't.
|
|
Okay.
|
|
Yes, I can't if you're listening.
|
|
This is a kind of plug for Hacker Public Radio, of course.
|
|
People, if you have, and this is a full disclosure,
|
|
we have been hosting Hacker Public Radio since day one.
|
|
We're still on Hacker Public Radio.
|
|
So, if Ken, if you're wondering where all the traffic comes from,
|
|
it's a show called Lins in Loss, just in case you're wondering.
|
|
Yes, and Ken, there will be an upcoming episode
|
|
on how to do websites, right?
|
|
So, stay tuned.
|
|
It's pencil info next year.
|
|
Or this year, actually, if you're listening,
|
|
because we're recording this.
|
|
Just before New Year's Eve, in 2021,
|
|
to release is somewhere in 2022.
|
|
Anyway, it doesn't matter.
|
|
And, of course, people, if...
|
|
Yes.
|
|
And the Hacker Public Radio, the project as such,
|
|
this, or stands by, what's what I'm looking for,
|
|
thrives, thrives from contributions.
|
|
So, if you've ever, if you've ever talked with the idea
|
|
of doing a podcast, and haven't done this yet,
|
|
topic doesn't matter, it can be...
|
|
That easy, too.
|
|
Anything.
|
|
Mental hospitals, and open-saws,
|
|
hips are programmable languages like Rust,
|
|
or maybe even Java.
|
|
Well, the HBR is not just computers based.
|
|
Exactly.
|
|
So, if you want to talk about...
|
|
Exactly, if you want to talk about your upbringing
|
|
in the Catholic Church,
|
|
Hacker Public Radio is the place to do so.
|
|
Can't be anything.
|
|
The thing is, basically, don't be afraid of putting the word out
|
|
in terms of...
|
|
Even if you've never done a podcast before, just do it.
|
|
It's not hard, actually, to tell.
|
|
Exactly, because we have to do it for two years,
|
|
and see what we are. Exactly.
|
|
Yes. So, oh, two years, right.
|
|
Yes, the hell, if it's two years, does that mean there's only three years,
|
|
theft of the five-year plan?
|
|
Indeed. Before the next half-year plan.
|
|
Question then is...
|
|
Well, I was going to ask you this,
|
|
because what happens to the five-year plan after years has gone past?
|
|
Does it then become a four-year plan?
|
|
What do you... Sorry, I didn't get that.
|
|
What do you mean?
|
|
Well, you start a five-year plan.
|
|
A year has gone by.
|
|
Does it then turn into a four-year plan?
|
|
No, we are into...
|
|
Year number two of the five-year plan.
|
|
As in the year two, year number two has been concluded.
|
|
So, that's three years left of the first five-year plan,
|
|
and then we do the second five-year plan.
|
|
The thing is, basically, our great leaders
|
|
back in the 20-hundreds didn't have ten-year plans.
|
|
So, this is the reason why we have to stick with five-year plans, right?
|
|
In the great spirit of communism and the Soviet Union and other great things.
|
|
Yeah, now did the Soviet Union change their five-year plans ever?
|
|
During the course of the five years?
|
|
I think after every two months or something,
|
|
I guess, when they had to make a production adjustment.
|
|
But that's beside the point.
|
|
No, that's curious.
|
|
Yeah, with planning, if you keep it fixed for five years,
|
|
you may be not necessarily be doing the right thing anymore.
|
|
As you know.
|
|
Well, too, this is the reason probably why they adjusted the seven-year plans.
|
|
But they still stuck to the original notion of a five-year plan.
|
|
This is called the human plan.
|
|
This is called the difference between theory and practice as both.
|
|
Going back to much more serious issues, namely our
|
|
relationship and, of course, people who have reached out to.
|
|
There's going to be more than five, isn't it?
|
|
Because we've got Chloe here, we've got...
|
|
We've got Biko.
|
|
Yes, Biko made a suggestion.
|
|
Oh, another one?
|
|
No, yes, he did indeed.
|
|
But that was kind of in 2021.
|
|
So he suggested to get in touch with the project called Serenity OS.
|
|
Okay, and he also mentioned two guys,
|
|
Condon Raskling and Linus Groh.
|
|
Both, of course, were contacted.
|
|
And let me read out what Andres Kling sent back.
|
|
Hello, Christ.
|
|
Thanks for reaching out.
|
|
Due to the political content of your podcast,
|
|
I respectfully decline the invitation,
|
|
regards Andres Kling.
|
|
Ah, yes, I mean, I just want to.
|
|
Yes, and he thought so in this morning.
|
|
Well, I don't think we were political at all.
|
|
To be honest.
|
|
Oh, nice.
|
|
Oh, nice, he's...
|
|
He's got something against the Soviet Union, or what's his name?
|
|
Vladimir, but...
|
|
So, yeah, I'm not trying to show what he's referring to.
|
|
What do you think?
|
|
Should we bring Flanima on for an episode, I wonder?
|
|
But then that would be that would have to be dubbed or recently later, or something.
|
|
Because I'm not sure that he's actually able to speak English.
|
|
Do you think?
|
|
Well, do you speak Russian, right?
|
|
But, um, he has all the...
|
|
Uh, I guess he's going to normally travels with the translator, doesn't he?
|
|
Well, true, and I'm still wondering about the...
|
|
I mean, it would gel with communist approach, yes, but I'm not sure about the open source angle.
|
|
No, no.
|
|
But going back to Andres, address if you're listening,
|
|
and we were quite confused about this.
|
|
We were...
|
|
It's a work of rejection, this is, that's probably what I'm not going for.
|
|
I think he's saying...
|
|
He hasn't listened to it yet, go ahead.
|
|
Well, the question...
|
|
I'm quite clear with it.
|
|
Yes, but the thing is, basically, we can't really take the piss at this at this response,
|
|
because he's done in a very polite way, and we should respect this.
|
|
Hmm, oh, yes.
|
|
Well, we can't trust him.
|
|
He made him ten more times for those good points.
|
|
Well, we can't, but we can certainly do a program about that, does that for us.
|
|
Because that's a very notion of open source software, no?
|
|
But annoying people.
|
|
Well, yes, but only through automation.
|
|
Okay.
|
|
And Biku, don't worry about this, about this rejection.
|
|
What about the other guy?
|
|
Yes, sorry.
|
|
Yes, thank you.
|
|
Yes, sorry.
|
|
Yes, little school, we can't take the piss at, because he never replied.
|
|
So, then, if you're listening, shame on you.
|
|
He's got a spam filter, clearly.
|
|
Of course, that's another opportunity, go on for SerenityOS to plug the whole thing
|
|
on one of the most important free Libren open source podcasts in the universe,
|
|
Namias.
|
|
Yes.
|
|
Another chance if anybody is listening, which is unlikely, but SerenityOS.
|
|
Need to say, if somebody is, if somebody is using SerenityOS, please get in touch.
|
|
Need to say, because Biku suggested it, we are more than game to do an episode on this one.
|
|
I checked it out myself.
|
|
It looks very interesting.
|
|
Unfortunately, as I said, the two programmers working on this,
|
|
declined or never get back to us, maybe there are two users out there
|
|
who want to talk about the experience with this open source operating system.
|
|
Well, apparently it was started by a Swedish guy called Andreas Kling,
|
|
so maybe we should run to Andreas instead.
|
|
Well, this is the one who declined.
|
|
I thought his name was someone else.
|
|
No, two guys are running this and Andreas Kling and Linus Grom.
|
|
Oh, Linus Grom, sorry, yes, okay, fine.
|
|
Okay, well, there's many other operating systems we can...
|
|
Indeed, instead.
|
|
So, Mr. Nadella, if you're listening, although Windows is not open source yet,
|
|
maybe you won't get in touch.
|
|
We can maybe have the scoop for the open source of Linus on the show.
|
|
They might want to do that.
|
|
Next on plan, let's put that in there.
|
|
What do you mean, Linus?
|
|
Linus is open source already?
|
|
You've never been in Windows.
|
|
Windows, yes.
|
|
So, Mr. Nadella, if you want to spill the beans,
|
|
please do it on our podcast.
|
|
Yes.
|
|
Well, he dresses Microsoft and Linus Illos for the you.
|
|
Assensable move on his part, for sure.
|
|
Indeed.
|
|
So, that covers two out of four listers, right?
|
|
We cover Claudio, we cover Beku.
|
|
You know, we have, we have quite a few.
|
|
We haven't heard from do-line ages.
|
|
You had Luna, yes, we also had...
|
|
Well, you see, funny, hang on, funny enough, he got in touch.
|
|
You see, thing is basically...
|
|
I've never told you this, right?
|
|
I went to this mini-deb con as a mini-debbing
|
|
maintainer conference in October of 2021.
|
|
Hello, yes.
|
|
And I need to say, give a presentation on Redis
|
|
and on Rust and the usual topics that I don't want to talk about.
|
|
And Luna must have viewed the video stream.
|
|
So, he got in touch.
|
|
And this is when he stopped listening.
|
|
Say again?
|
|
Is this when he stopped listening to the chat?
|
|
No, no, no, no, no, no.
|
|
Oh, okay.
|
|
He got in touch with me and said, now I can put a face to a voice.
|
|
Ah, okay, okay.
|
|
Well, if he'd only gone to the website, he could have seen our faces, but yeah, anyway.
|
|
Speaking of which, we should probably reveal what these two, what these two mark shots on the website are, right?
|
|
Because we have given the fact that we're...
|
|
We could do, we could do a...
|
|
Quite a few people suggested to go on Twitch or YouTube with our podcast.
|
|
But then we, yes, they did.
|
|
But then I was kind of replied and said, look,
|
|
there's a reason why the mom told me you have a face for a radio podcast,
|
|
or you have a face for a podcast with a video cast.
|
|
Not just what your mom told you.
|
|
I love it. We never talked about podcasts.
|
|
You never...
|
|
So for these two other people, the two mark shots on the website are actually ex-chapendails
|
|
that we paid a significant amount of money for to take their shots being taken.
|
|
Martin and myself look quite different.
|
|
Indeed.
|
|
Okay.
|
|
So people, for the time being, we won't appear on YouTube.
|
|
No, that's for sure.
|
|
Unless you pay us an insane amount of money,
|
|
then we might be tempted.
|
|
Unlikely, unlikely.
|
|
Unlikely, exactly.
|
|
Yes. Okay. So where were we?
|
|
Yeah, a number of listeners.
|
|
And I'm sure there's more than that because we have many comments, really.
|
|
Yeah, but Martin, speak of...
|
|
Go on, go on, go on, go on.
|
|
The marketing just one more time.
|
|
You, as you run marketing, if you haven't fired the month and the month and the
|
|
last two weeks, what are, what are our search engine optimization results in terms of
|
|
open source podcasts, search results, and all the rest of it?
|
|
Well, I can tell you that.
|
|
If you give me a minute, please.
|
|
The function is called R&D as in random.
|
|
I see.
|
|
Anyway, keep talking.
|
|
No, I'm just waiting for the numbers to get to come through, Martin.
|
|
In terms of how popular are we really with regards to if somebody types in the search term,
|
|
open source podcasts?
|
|
Oh, I see. No, I was going to look at the R&D six on this.
|
|
But we can probably just have a look at the
|
|
at our popularity.
|
|
Let's have a look.
|
|
Well, we are number one, clearly.
|
|
Excellent.
|
|
So that hasn't really changed since last year.
|
|
And by the way, you probably noticed that we are also being, well,
|
|
scraped by many, many, many other podcast websites.
|
|
We are Google podcasts, but that's the sole reason why, because I put us there.
|
|
No, no, just there are also some podcast sites who just go around scraping
|
|
podcasts.
|
|
Yes, and indeed, and in quite a few of them scrape out of Australia correct.
|
|
It's curious, but there we go.
|
|
And how many results do you think there are on Google for links in those?
|
|
I do not know, because Martin is your domain Martin.
|
|
Have a guess.
|
|
Two, maybe three.
|
|
No, keep going.
|
|
20?
|
|
You can't, you have a few orders of magnitude wrong there.
|
|
Two trillion, five hundred, five hundred, almost at a million, almost at a million
|
|
third results.
|
|
Are you serious?
|
|
Yeah, but this is actually, this is because Google split Linux in-laws into two.
|
|
So the box that you read finally paid off.
|
|
Okay, no, this more like a 287, that's better.
|
|
Makes sense. Can't spoke about triple digits.
|
|
When we were futilely, futilely set a word, no, it's not.
|
|
When we were discussing download figures, and where can write the observe, that's not a metric to go by.
|
|
Because you have, you kind of bots downloading the episodes left or right in center, it doesn't make sense.
|
|
We have another listener, but at least two, seven.
|
|
To Sir Evan Labovic said, nice interview of me on the other side of us.
|
|
I'm kidding.
|
|
Mark, this is called progress, no?
|
|
We're being promoted as well, yeah, it's great.
|
|
Perfect.
|
|
Indeed.
|
|
So, how have we gotten on with our review five years?
|
|
Yes, do we want to talk about fuck-ups?
|
|
Did we have any?
|
|
A server.
|
|
I thought our audio was reasonably supported.
|
|
Quite a few server migrations come to mind.
|
|
Oh, yes, yes.
|
|
Yeah, oh, a handy tip for you.
|
|
If you want to, if you want to go to OS, do not run, you've been.
|
|
Let's hear.
|
|
Same goes for postgres and devian people.
|
|
If you're upgrading this, that actually happened to me.
|
|
If you're upgrading this on, on, from Buster City to Bullseye,
|
|
and if you have a running postgres instance on that machine,
|
|
you want to check a very serious look at migration paths,
|
|
and you want to do this before the upgrade, just in case.
|
|
And, Martin, fun enough, it took me actually not just to enter the castle called postgres,
|
|
but to go down to the center to fight some saber-toothed tigers
|
|
and some guards and some other atrocities, let's put it this way,
|
|
before I can even near the crown jewels, as is now it's done.
|
|
And this was, and that wasn't a great example for postgres documentation, by the way.
|
|
Well, Buster City is documenting the code, you don't need the documentation.
|
|
Martin, if you have about five people screaming at you, why this bloody server isn't running,
|
|
never want to, never want the postgres instance on that,
|
|
do you really think you have the time to go through the source code?
|
|
I'll just check it.
|
|
Well, it sounds like a clear and unprepared bit and prepared bit of
|
|
bit of upgraded activity.
|
|
No, the documentation team, we feel listening postgres documentation is normally excellent,
|
|
don't get me wrong, but this bit could be improved, especially in migration tools.
|
|
In terms of what server is running has to run one and where, and what the migration path really is,
|
|
because I had to find it out the hard way.
|
|
And that wasn't pleasant.
|
|
She should have asked someone else.
|
|
That's better, that's good.
|
|
Well, who comes to mind, Martin, I wonder?
|
|
On many postgres, I see people out there.
|
|
So that was one fuckup.
|
|
Okay, fun.
|
|
And there's of course the continued challenge called Littings Audio.
|
|
Oh yes, just a bit.
|
|
Well, I don't know, we've kind of settled on a method that appears to be working.
|
|
Yes, until we can get big group button containerized properly for a change.
|
|
I don't know who's working on this, but that's beside the point.
|
|
Well, you try and fail, didn't you?
|
|
Indeed, but that was over a year ago.
|
|
Well, the other
|
|
fuckup, well, the issue you had.
|
|
You can't, Martin, you can't be explicit.
|
|
We're labeled as explicit on all of that.
|
|
I wouldn't go that far because it isn't really as more of a small issue,
|
|
was the, the lost Opus file switch.
|
|
Yes, I have to recover from the video recordings of Big Blue Button.
|
|
After a certain cause, Hesse, you left right in centre.
|
|
Why was that again?
|
|
Is that because he didn't check the, I would have postproduction didn't download the episodes
|
|
that they're correct, yes, not in time anyway.
|
|
Indeed.
|
|
Yes, yeah, so Big Blue Button has a handy cleanup feature that leads all the Opus files after two weeks
|
|
for the, yes, but it doesn't do is, it's clear, all the video recordings after two weeks,
|
|
luckily, sir. We're all good.
|
|
Excellent, excellent, excellent.
|
|
So Big Blue Button, if you're listening full marks on this.
|
|
Yes, try not to introduce a video cleaner for team, please.
|
|
Yes, or come to think of it, basically, why, I mean, there's no backup framework
|
|
as part of Big Blue Button, right, because you have to do it all manually.
|
|
Indeed.
|
|
Never mind the fact that the recording interface could be cleaned up left right in centre as well.
|
|
Well, we don't use the recording interface anyway.
|
|
Because they're not right.
|
|
No, no, they kind of end up in this, in this web page at some point, but
|
|
but because this rudimentary would be an exaggeration, I think.
|
|
Yes, but that's just my opinion.
|
|
Yes, but you don't need it because you've just seen it instead.
|
|
But yeah, I think in all cases of these issues, it's probably a case of people
|
|
not reading their documentation as well.
|
|
If there is any.
|
|
Yes, yes, that's certainly in my case, the case here.
|
|
There was no documentation that said anywhere.
|
|
It's going to be deleted here.
|
|
There you have it, people.
|
|
Yeah, if these are the two minor issues that we can across last year.
|
|
But that was about it.
|
|
I mean, in fairness, no.
|
|
I mean, other than that, we are hosting on Debian, at least the website and other stuff,
|
|
and that has been quite stable.
|
|
Let's put it this way.
|
|
Martin has certain challenges with Ubuntu, but I reckon that's down to him,
|
|
and his technical expertise.
|
|
I might be wrong, of course.
|
|
Oh, sure, yes.
|
|
Anything you want to add, Martin.
|
|
Funny enough, for next time, it has to be quite stable.
|
|
No, it hasn't.
|
|
There's always something wrong with the certificates.
|
|
No, there isn't.
|
|
I think this is one of the, I think the IT department must be still in communist Russia
|
|
because the tickets will never get rid of all the tickets.
|
|
What tickets?
|
|
Ah, yes, that'll be why, because they're spreading the bin here.
|
|
It's called DEF-MAL, yes.
|
|
Okay, where will we listen to ships?
|
|
A listener.
|
|
Listen to a ship?
|
|
Yes, but I think we tackle this.
|
|
So, what's that, Martin?
|
|
In terms of what's going to be the next 12 months?
|
|
In contrast to the show?
|
|
Yes, we are not going to go into Haiku.
|
|
Like, for example, the Ubuntu podcast did for the last 14 years,
|
|
by the way, they are gone, right?
|
|
Did you know this?
|
|
They have a broadcasting in October or something.
|
|
You mentioned it.
|
|
Well, not surprising, really.
|
|
Well, 14 years is a long time, no?
|
|
How long did the outlaws last?
|
|
Four, five years, I love this.
|
|
I think the fact and then the other broadcasting in 2010 and I think they packed it up
|
|
in 2015, maybe in 2016.
|
|
So, five or six years are reckoned.
|
|
Details may be in the show notes.
|
|
In terms of a Wikipedia page or something.
|
|
Maybe not.
|
|
Okay.
|
|
Actually.
|
|
Yeah, well,
|
|
so I don't think, no, it doesn't say in our five-year plan that we're going to stop after five years.
|
|
No.
|
|
But that would mean another three years before the first five-year plan has actually been concluded.
|
|
So that's a lot of episodes down the road.
|
|
I reckon it's fair to say that you have to endure us for the next couple of months anyway.
|
|
Well, there is no such thing as that.
|
|
Enjoy, I think, is the word you mean?
|
|
Be.
|
|
You're clearly talking about the wrong podcast here.
|
|
Maybe.
|
|
Let's see.
|
|
Needless to say listeners, the old adage to stay is still valid if you have any ideas.
|
|
Like Be cool, for example, just topics every now and then.
|
|
I mean, because we have settled on a format where we're also
|
|
in case you miss this, we will alternate between internal shows where we don't have any guests
|
|
and shows where we do have external people on the podcast.
|
|
Needless to say, if you have a topic that crosses your mind,
|
|
like Be cool, suggest every now and then.
|
|
Be good and fair, fair, fair, fair play to you in full marks here.
|
|
Please get in touch.
|
|
The email addresses feedback and little signals are the you or simply leave a comment
|
|
on the current on the corresponding episode web patrons of something like a public radio.
|
|
Yeah.
|
|
Yeah, that's what I think.
|
|
Do we I don't think we've had any successful
|
|
suggestions for an episode, except for the upcoming one, the next year, but from Ken.
|
|
But Be cool send into any to us and other stuff.
|
|
Yeah, but that's not what I'm materialized if they're not going to turn up.
|
|
Correct.
|
|
Yes.
|
|
Whereas, yeah.
|
|
Yeah, but yeah, we can we have many topics to talk about anyway.
|
|
Yes.
|
|
Indeed.
|
|
Also, now's the time to talk about the Mia Echo, the in-laws guard of the last 12 months.
|
|
MSBC calls it an open source podcast not to be missed.
|
|
Fox News, Trump or not,
|
|
concurrence with if there's only one Floss podcast you want to listen to.
|
|
If you're serious about free and open source, it's the Linux and laws.
|
|
Even NPR had to say about us.
|
|
We in brackets NPR maybe perceived as the ultimate source for communist ideas and ideals,
|
|
but for the real truth always referred to the Linux and laws.
|
|
The open source podcast with the most radical approach to sharing ideas in the real meaning
|
|
of socialism and beyond.
|
|
But the ultimate endorsement comes from the grumpy old quarters.
|
|
So just a warning to our listeners, right?
|
|
It's sometimes a bit crazy.
|
|
Crazy.
|
|
Okay, as this may sound out of context, he is the full endorsement.
|
|
So maybe time to do some cross-marketing.
|
|
There is an episode, the last episode of the Linux and laws, but you can hear on
|
|
heck our public radio, right?
|
|
So HPR.
|
|
If you would like listening to us, you might like to listen to this little fight
|
|
actually our conversations with them always a little bit like
|
|
we don't say heated up, but we tend to have our little tiny
|
|
controversial discussions in a very friendly way indeed.
|
|
Very friendly bento, I think bento is the right word, a bit of a fourth bento.
|
|
Maybe, maybe.
|
|
But I mean, let's say Kristoff and Martin, they have a good sense of humor as well.
|
|
I really like those guys.
|
|
Exactly.
|
|
So meaning much true if this is coming through this podcast here,
|
|
but usually I'm quite sarcastic, right?
|
|
Well, by the sense of humor, they have a slightly different, right?
|
|
It's not just sarcasm, sarcasm.
|
|
It's more surreal.
|
|
The sense of humor is more surreal than ours, and it's a little bit more...
|
|
It's quite nice, I like it.
|
|
Yeah, I like it as well, but it's just the warning to our listeners, right?
|
|
It's sometimes a bit crazy, let's say, right?
|
|
Reality changes during the hour that you listen to it.
|
|
Yeah, by intention, I guess.
|
|
But anyway, good fun though.
|
|
Everyone should listen to them, I think.
|
|
Exactly, exactly.
|
|
Listen to the loose and loose.
|
|
I couldn't have put it better.
|
|
As usual, the grumpies are spot on.
|
|
But wait, there's more.
|
|
As our regular listeners will probably remember,
|
|
we were guessed at the GOCs during the year as part of an episode on free and open source software.
|
|
So now, what else?
|
|
Open world.
|
|
I actually opened world was one of our most successful ones.
|
|
Really?
|
|
This was with the...
|
|
Yeah, I've regarded it in number of listens, let's say, right?
|
|
And I think because it was with the crumpy...
|
|
Sorry, the other convue quarter.
|
|
So the linox and loss, right?
|
|
So, one minute.
|
|
Okay, who are we?
|
|
Who are we gonna say?
|
|
Yeah, where am I?
|
|
My name is David, sorry.
|
|
Is it?
|
|
Thanks, yeah.
|
|
Maybe.
|
|
Okay.
|
|
No, with the linox and loss.
|
|
There, we actually were guessed with the linox and loss.
|
|
Guys, last week, right?
|
|
Two weeks ago, two weeks ago.
|
|
Some time ago.
|
|
Yeah, a couple of time ago.
|
|
I think the episode was released last week, but...
|
|
Yes.
|
|
The year end thing.
|
|
Yeah, the year end.
|
|
And there, we are always the guests as crumpy of quarter.
|
|
So I was kind of a bit confused about this.
|
|
But yeah, the linox and loss, guys, were guests,
|
|
thankful for the open world episode.
|
|
And we just talked about open source and the role of open source and so on.
|
|
And I think this was a good one as well, right?
|
|
I think so too.
|
|
We just rejected a number as indeed as well.
|
|
But I guess what happened there is also that
|
|
of the listeners of the linox and loss kind of
|
|
listened to all podcasts as well.
|
|
And they were the cross promoted that.
|
|
Yeah, it was cross promoted, but it dropped afterwards again,
|
|
which means that I'm not sure what is...
|
|
But this is telling us, right?
|
|
So maybe I...
|
|
Maybe we basically attracted new people, right?
|
|
So hardcore open source fans, and then we said,
|
|
I scared them away with Kotlin again, right?
|
|
I guess this is what happened.
|
|
I would tell.
|
|
So people, it's straightforward.
|
|
If you want to boost your numbers, just invite us over
|
|
and we'll take care of the rest.
|
|
And we are cheaper, more affordable,
|
|
than you may think.
|
|
Just get in touch.
|
|
Martin, so what do you make of this?
|
|
The grumpy singing.
|
|
Yes.
|
|
Yeah, as I said, it was surprising to me.
|
|
I mean, we are perfectly sane and
|
|
nowhere are any animals harmed in the process.
|
|
No, Martin, we are not.
|
|
Because the last remarks, actually, from David,
|
|
that we are crazy.
|
|
Yes, I know.
|
|
David, if you're listening, and I'm sure you are...
|
|
I'm sure there's something wrong with him.
|
|
Oh, that's crazy.
|
|
No, no, Martin, this is the biggest compliment that we could get.
|
|
Because you see, we are off the beaten track since day one.
|
|
Yes, that's true.
|
|
And never mind the comments we got from MSNBC, CNN.
|
|
And Fox and whatever.
|
|
Oh, yes.
|
|
Can Brazos actually read the math?
|
|
No, no, no, no.
|
|
What did that for?
|
|
I don't understand.
|
|
I've already done this about two minutes ago,
|
|
but that's what I thought.
|
|
No, I mean, this is just one limit that we could get.
|
|
I mean, never mind the comments or not.
|
|
Yeah, it's also nice that they enjoy the episodes
|
|
with us, which is mutual, I'm sure.
|
|
So, yeah, no, it's a nice compliment indeed.
|
|
We try to not to be too sane anyway.
|
|
To be fair.
|
|
Well, actually, we don't need to try very hard to be fair.
|
|
And people, I mean, speaking of cross-promoting,
|
|
you just heard the clip so far enough.
|
|
So we might as well take the opportunity to cross-promote
|
|
the grumpy oil quarters.
|
|
Yeah, they're done a few interesting things this year.
|
|
Indeed.
|
|
And it's way beyond if you can't get to sleep,
|
|
like the license episode, listen to them.
|
|
Like, you listen to us if you can't get to sleep
|
|
about the license episode, don't worry about it.
|
|
But there are two episodes worth mentioning.
|
|
And the teaser is actually,
|
|
if you listen to the New Year's episode,
|
|
we'll be with them together.
|
|
You have to hint there.
|
|
And we leave it at that because, of course,
|
|
you should listen to the backhouse log.
|
|
Hey!
|
|
Commercial break ending right now.
|
|
Yeah, yeah.
|
|
Hey, I got an idea. Why don't they sponsor us?
|
|
They're already doing this, if you had,
|
|
if you would have the decency,
|
|
if you would have the decency to check out our account balances.
|
|
Oh, I don't know.
|
|
You seem to be keeping account balances from me, sir.
|
|
Perhaps I should be there.
|
|
No Martin, just have someone else for fun.
|
|
Just get in touch with your other U in terms of the CFO.
|
|
And you have it right in front of you.
|
|
You see Martin, the account credentials are in both our names,
|
|
so you can check them out anytime you like.
|
|
It's quite straightforward.
|
|
Well, yeah.
|
|
And I think was that this whole thing comes to length, no?
|
|
Yeah, I think that's here.
|
|
Here, one, the year two.
|
|
Year two, yes.
|
|
Year two of the five-year plan.
|
|
Yeah, I'm afraid to add that the podcast won't come to an end,
|
|
but just here too.
|
|
So no sweat.
|
|
Yep.
|
|
So yeah.
|
|
Our dear listeners, including Biko,
|
|
Claudio and the other three listeners will have to endure us any longer.
|
|
But we may be able to spread the word even further.
|
|
Martin had this brilliant idea of putting us on the app podcast,
|
|
so stay tuned.
|
|
We have this offer saying there.
|
|
Oh, not.
|
|
Depending.
|
|
Well, it's one or the other, right?
|
|
No, Martin, it's not it's actually true.
|
|
It's it's it's not, it's not quantum physics.
|
|
No, no.
|
|
The place we won't be appearing,
|
|
unlike other kind of podcasters,
|
|
it's outlawed.
|
|
It's sure.
|
|
And the unless part,
|
|
unless outlawed wants to join the large number of sponsors,
|
|
of the good ideas, exactly, and send us money.
|
|
But apart from that, or until this happens,
|
|
soundcloud, I'm afraid it's a no go.
|
|
Yeah, sorry.
|
|
So if you want to if you want to boost your your subscription base,
|
|
please add us and but before you do the send us money.
|
|
Yes, we don't come cheap.
|
|
No, we don't.
|
|
We should probably thank our listeners for last year's
|
|
just your ship.
|
|
Oh, I want to be honest.
|
|
Yeah, exactly.
|
|
So to all the eight or be all too sorry,
|
|
we got to cut this out.
|
|
And to all the eight out of you there,
|
|
thank you for listening.
|
|
Yes, keep up with me.
|
|
Yeah.
|
|
This is the Linux in-laws.
|
|
You come for the knowledge.
|
|
But stay for the madness.
|
|
Thank you for listening.
|
|
This podcast is licensed under the latest version
|
|
of the creative commons license.
|
|
Tap attribution share like credits for the entry music
|
|
go to bluesy roosters for the song
|
|
salute margo to twin flames for their peace called the flow
|
|
used for the second intros.
|
|
And finally to the lesser ground for the songs we just
|
|
is used by the dark side.
|
|
You find these and other ditties license
|
|
under creative commons at your mando.
|
|
The website dedicated to liberate the music industry
|
|
from choking corporate legislation
|
|
and other crap concepts.
|
|
You've been listening to Hacker Public Radio
|
|
at HackerPublicRadio.org.
|
|
Today's show was contributed by an HBR listener like yourself.
|
|
If you ever thought of recording a podcast
|
|
then click on our contribute link to find out
|
|
how easy it really is.
|
|
Hosting for HBR is kindly provided by
|
|
an honesthost.com, the internet archive
|
|
and our sync.net unless otherwise stated
|
|
Today's show is released under creative commons
|
|
attribution share like 3.0 license
|