- MCP server with stdio transport for local use - Search episodes, transcripts, hosts, and series - 4,511 episodes with metadata and transcripts - Data loader with in-memory JSON storage 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
250 lines
10 KiB
Plaintext
250 lines
10 KiB
Plaintext
Episode: 324
|
|
Title: HPR0324: webmin
|
|
Source: https://hub.hackerpublicradio.org/ccdn.php?filename=/eps/hpr0324/hpr0324.mp3
|
|
Transcribed: 2025-10-07 16:21:41
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
to
|
|
here.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
So if you've got a web server, you need to administrate virtual domains for mail and
|
|
for the web sites, you've got many web sites on one machine there, then you can use virtual
|
|
one to do that.
|
|
So that's quite much from that point of view.
|
|
It takes a lot of pain out of maintaining one of those systems.
|
|
And then userman provides your ordinary Linux users with a sort of web interface to maintain
|
|
the mail, the prop mail files, the official mail files, all that kind of stuff.
|
|
So it's quite nice at that point of view.
|
|
I haven't actually used it much myself, the userman part, but the virtual one part looks
|
|
like something that's worth looking into.
|
|
Okay, so now do we just want to tell our listeners how they can find webbing and how to install
|
|
it?
|
|
Yeah, that'll be a good idea.
|
|
Most distributions will have a webman already in their repositories, so if you're using
|
|
something like a debut and you're used to get, if you're using Red Hat or Fedora, you'll
|
|
use something like Yum.
|
|
And it gets a suzer, I think a new thing is called Zafar, ZYPPER, it's a new installation
|
|
package manager.
|
|
So you can probably find it in the repositories, and if not, I think you can go to the webman
|
|
home page and actually download a lot of the packages people there for form the webman
|
|
and the people that actually produce webbing.
|
|
Okay, and then we wanted to just touch on some security issues.
|
|
Yeah, yeah.
|
|
How have you set up a webman in the past, do you access it remotely over your network or
|
|
remote connections?
|
|
Remotely over my network and having to work through the firewall with more authority?
|
|
Yeah, but one of the issues that often comes up with when you mention webbing to people
|
|
is the issue of security, because you know, you can set up to work on ITTPS, but this
|
|
is something, you know, you feel inherently insecure, even that much power available on
|
|
a web server, even if it doesn't run on port, I know it doesn't run on port 80 by default,
|
|
it runs on port 10,000 by default, but it's, you know, sometimes you will feel a bit
|
|
insecure about doing that.
|
|
If you do, if you feel like it, then you can always just port for 10,000 over the SSH.
|
|
So the whole tunnel is encrypted radio, for it gets sent over the network, and then
|
|
if you've got a HTTPS running on there as well, it's via another layer of encryption.
|
|
So that's how often we do it, so if we do have to access machines on remotely, yeah,
|
|
another way to tell people to do it is the first VPN into the network, and then they,
|
|
you know, fire up the browser and access access webman that way, because that was another
|
|
way of having a secure connection on two webmen.
|
|
All right, so just to recap then, the advantages and the disadvantages we might see of this
|
|
program.
|
|
So I'll just talk what, again, to recap the advantages that I see, that it installs on
|
|
most most common distros, and like you say, it's in the repositories and easy to get to,
|
|
that many Linux administrators are familiar with it, and that it has a great GUI for people
|
|
to use instead of the text command line, and I can say to avoid those, just those little
|
|
typing errors that could cause a catastrophe.
|
|
Mark, what do you see some of the disadvantages of Webman?
|
|
I think, you know, for me, Webman is, it's an intermediate step until you become proficient
|
|
in the administration of the whole, of the machine or the box, but I mean, you know, having
|
|
said that it's also, it has its place in the sense that if you go a lot of machines in
|
|
Minister, they'll have a lot of time, sometimes graphically, the administration of the box
|
|
is a lot quicker.
|
|
So firstly, I prefer to configure things on the command line, but, you know, if you
|
|
got 50 clients and they all, you know, and you have to be configured and maintained,
|
|
and you have to provide a level of service that sometimes is best just to install Webman.
|
|
I always, at least have it as a backup tool as well, because if somebody comes with
|
|
the esoteric server that I've never installed before, I mean, let's say, for example,
|
|
and I'll mainly use PostFix for the MTE, SMTP server, when you go to some client to take
|
|
them over and they're using send mail, or what's the other one, or Q-mail, or one of those
|
|
kind of mail applications, which I'm unfamiliar with, you know, then I'll use Webman top
|
|
with the configuration, because I understand the concept behind parsing the mail server,
|
|
I don't need to know what all of the specific configuration options are for those different
|
|
servers. So that's when I'll also tend to use Webman when I'm feeling a little bit, you
|
|
know, I don't have enough time to read up on all of the different config options and I
|
|
understand, oh, and I want to make sure that it gets configured properly and has reasonable
|
|
defaults, then I'll use some in like Webman to assist with that.
|
|
Okay. Hen, Mark, you asked me if I had used any other remote and then tools, how about
|
|
yourself, the ones you're familiar with?
|
|
Well, as I say, I mainly use SSH to do the configuration from the command line. The other
|
|
remote tools I've been recently looking at is something called eBox, because what you
|
|
see is a whole sort of, all you call it, a Florence kind of software that's coming out
|
|
these days. You know, most of them sort of run on like firewalls, distributions, you'll
|
|
get like a GUI that can configure everything when DHCP servers, the DNS, and you know, obviously
|
|
the firewall and those kind of things, but you're also getting ones that help you demonstrate
|
|
users and the eBox looks like something that does that. So there's all things to be
|
|
looking into. It's smooth towards, Mark and he's smooth towards like a plants kind of
|
|
approach to networking and it's especially good for small businesses. And just like you
|
|
get your aches over to, you know, no one ever messes with that, you just turn it on and
|
|
turn it off and it works. You know, small businesses often lack that, you know, it's just
|
|
work. The switch it off, switch it on and it comes right. And I think that's where
|
|
a bunch of people are going to you with the sort of network management tool, basic networking
|
|
services as well. They don't want to have to set the click millions of buttons to get
|
|
something configured and working. And so this whole approach is sort of turning it into
|
|
an implant, it has a simple interface, click a few buttons, hit a few options, and then
|
|
it works. It's really where, you know, where a lot of the stuff is hitting. And I think
|
|
you'll see that as well with this whole administration of networks as well.
|
|
All right. And you also do you have some information like about the company that made a web
|
|
man or like there's philosophy at all? What I know is women a while ago they were run,
|
|
I think there was something across country or something like that was owned them. I see
|
|
now there is another company seems to have taken them over. So they've got a commercial
|
|
solution to the system as well. And I think that also leads a bit of a decline in the
|
|
community. Because you know, women at one stage was quite, you know, had quite a bit
|
|
of a man she seems to be decreasing over time. So I'm not sure whether that's related
|
|
to the changes in ownership of the code and the company that could just sort of basically
|
|
sponsoring the development for this application. But yeah, it does seem to be some issues
|
|
around there and maybe some of the listes out there will know a bit more about it. But,
|
|
you know, it seems, you know, that it's on the up and up in terms of using it as an open-source
|
|
solution in your business. And yourself and Darlene, have you had any feedback on using
|
|
web man? Yeah, it was, you know, I had recommended to me by several strong Linux users. And when
|
|
I had posted a comment that I was testing it on a bunch, right away, I had people come back saying
|
|
it was unsupported and, you know, this idea. And so I think to maybe they're not seeing it as
|
|
true open-source, but it is a valuable tool that you can integrate. And it does provide another
|
|
level of service and support to your system. So I think it's worth investigating.
|
|
Look, I think it does have value. A lot of these projects, I think it's one thing,
|
|
always going to look at when you actually use the open-source solution, is, you know,
|
|
which company is sponsoring the project. And this is a good community around the project.
|
|
And, you know, they all have a couple of these projects which were open-source and they seem to
|
|
have had a commercial entity take, take an interesting name. I think the podcast recently
|
|
about firewalls in one such distribution, for example, was RPCOP. And it does seem that there's,
|
|
you know, some companies are better to get the open-source mix route. So, yeah, so maybe they just
|
|
sort of need to find the way there and sort that out. But, you know, for you finally, we
|
|
some, I'm somebody on the other side of the radio broadcast now getting really frustrated because
|
|
you're not community, could be right ahead of the route, that idea was going on. But I think
|
|
that's our feeling on it. And, you know, if anybody knows any more about the company's
|
|
direction that is going, feel free to provide some feedback on it. I mean, I really think it's a
|
|
good project that, you know, indeed a bit more exposure and a bit more, could do with a bit more
|
|
people using a bit of community behind it. All right, well, that's all I have to share today, Mark,
|
|
and how about yourself? Yeah, that's, that's all for now. I think what we would do is look at
|
|
each episode, we've been getting out, maybe look at other tools that can be useful in multi-ministration.
|
|
But yeah, Whitman was the one that we covered today and I hope that some of our listeners find
|
|
this useful. So just to wrap up today, I really enjoyed the opportunity to co-host with you
|
|
and I look forward to our next podcast together. Let's go. Yeah. Okay, thanks, Tallin, for, for
|
|
Kai's in the show with me. I'd like to thank all our listeners for, for tuning into this
|
|
episode and we'll be releasing more episodes in the future in the future. So keep tuned. Thank you
|
|
very much. Thank you for listening to the Africa Public Radio. HPR is sponsored by Carol.net.
|
|
So head on over to C-A-R-O dot N-E-C for all of us here.
|
|
Thank you for listening to the Africa Public Radio.
|
|
Thank you for listening to the Africa Public Radio. HPR is sponsored by Carol.net. So head on
|
|
over to C-A-R-O dot N-E-C for all of us here.
|