- MCP server with stdio transport for local use - Search episodes, transcripts, hosts, and series - 4,511 episodes with metadata and transcripts - Data loader with in-memory JSON storage 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
165 lines
13 KiB
Plaintext
165 lines
13 KiB
Plaintext
Episode: 754
|
|
Title: HPR0754: The Language Frontier Episode 6
|
|
Source: https://hub.hackerpublicradio.org/ccdn.php?filename=/eps/hpr0754/hpr0754.mp3
|
|
Transcribed: 2025-10-08 01:55:55
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
.
|
|
Is it a function of a new millennium that language would just all of a sudden prove itself updated?
|
|
In an emerging infrastructure that connects the over six and a half billion human citizens of planet Earth,
|
|
we use language because it's our only option.
|
|
But 7,000 languages really seems like some added steps that actually get in the way of real communication.
|
|
There is another form of universal language though, and it is icons and logos, which in many cases are the same thing.
|
|
But again, that only goes so far.
|
|
All they really convey is general recognition, and one must use language to build a basis for this recognition in the form of commercials.
|
|
Pictures can only take us so far.
|
|
So what is the answer? Let's look to the scientific community.
|
|
Is there a scientific language? Well, if there was one, it could be used at medical conferences.
|
|
Now, one of the major arguments against a universal language for science is the need for secrecy and security with regard to certain scientific advances and whatnot.
|
|
Which personally I think is a rather unfortunate concern, but many people would probably say in response to that,
|
|
that it's just one of those necessary evils that is humanities cross the bear.
|
|
What can I say? But hypothetically, if humanity were to overcome our relentless need for secrecy and security,
|
|
and a universal language was able to be implemented for science, it could then be used by any industry worldwide.
|
|
And it wouldn't have to be the only language. It could be the one supplemental language that we all use for interacting with people whose language we don't speak.
|
|
So the question is, is humanity close to such a thing as a universal auxiliary language?
|
|
I've hinted toward it a few times earlier in the podcast. There is a language that did not develop organically. It's called Esperanto.
|
|
It was invented just over a hundred years ago for the sole purpose of helping the native speakers of different languages communicate with one another.
|
|
This language borrows heavily from a few different languages, and it gained a fairly sizable following back in the 1800s when it first came out.
|
|
And it's not like this guy totally reinvented the wheel here.
|
|
The inventor of the language lived in an area where different languages were being spoken regularly. His idea was to invent a language that no one would be tied to nationally.
|
|
One of its primary objectives was to be easy to learn, which is more than you can say for HTML, and still we see how quickly people have become fluent in the hybrid text markup language.
|
|
And in all languages you have many verb conjugations, but in Esperanto there are many, many less. Everything is one gender. You don't have a masculine and feminine forms, say, for example, a feminine table and a masculine pencil.
|
|
Those elements of beauty that we mentioned in episode two found again in languages like Latin or French are not part of the makeup of Esperanto. Esperanto is a purely functional language.
|
|
It simply borrows from lots of other languages, and it's easy to learn. And I think everybody knows, especially after a room came out, people became hit to the idea that almost all languages have certain commonalities and words.
|
|
Many words bear striking similarities to their counterparts in other languages, spoken in other countries and continents.
|
|
Esperanto capitalizes on those similarities and tries to find as many common sounding words for each thing and is reminiscent of different languages, like Papoli is actually people.
|
|
That just sounds like a variation on pronunciation, doesn't it? And the really cool thing about Esperanto is that actually millions of people speak it. It's a language that's alive. There's even a library of books in Esperanto over in Europe.
|
|
This is a language that is actually alive. People are using it. What we need to do is take a lesson from HTML in my space here.
|
|
The Hypertext Markup language, it was developed to be a simple computer language. It's not as complicated as C++, Pearl, or even JavaScript, which is a simple programming language.
|
|
People have been using and learning HTML even more so than we've expected. Programs like Microsoft, Front Page, Mac, or Media, Dreamweaver that have been designed to make HTML even simpler are seem redundant.
|
|
Because people are learning the code itself. The time that it really took off was with the personal web spaces like MySpace and Facebook, like the young kids have nowadays, where it was really in their own interest to download images or upload computer movies, what not.
|
|
On their friends is web spaces. Personally, I think people who are learning if this HTML will continue to do so if it benefits them directly.
|
|
People will want to learn something that will allow them to make flashy web banners that or even animate gifts or whatnot.
|
|
My opinion, the reason why people are learning it is because there's something in it for them.
|
|
Obviously it worked for MySpace. There was no cheat. You had to learn the language of raw code. What might people want that would make Esperanto attractive? Connecting to more people? Maybe not. Maybe something else.
|
|
I've heard people that is human beings, have a desire in the abstract or theoretical sense to connect with other members of the species, but putting that into practice is another matter. All sorts of things come up.
|
|
It could be an emergency option, lots of different types of events, clothes, refugees. I'm sure some of those people must face language barrier issues.
|
|
The thing is, people are very adaptable. If their life depends on it, they will make themselves understood. They will adapt.
|
|
If you are in survival mode, you can start speaking another language within days and weeks. A switch seems to get turned on in the mind or laugh at.
|
|
You can totally have that potential, but what is going to make people want to learn a universal language? I don't know. I have no idea in that.
|
|
But fear and with the spirit of man could accomplish it. The Lord said, let us go down and confuse their language so that they may not understand one another's speech.
|
|
Wow, man could accomplish anything. That's heavy. What could man accomplish?
|
|
Hell, Greek. 3000 years ago, which is as advanced as we are, so what are these barriers that teach people from reaching anywhere near their real potential?
|
|
The answer to that is found in another question and that's it. Which is the most universal human characteristic? Fear or lazy?
|
|
Men don't live up to their potential. That's nothing new. Fear, yes. Well, why do we have fear? Part of it has to do with not having a common language.
|
|
But the paradox is that the barrier keeps us safe, but what do we say from? What could men accomplish if we all spoke the same language and didn't have this formidable barrier?
|
|
Look, cancer is something we cannot just step around. It's something we really have to study and defeat, but language is obviously something that we can sidestep. It's that easy.
|
|
We could get rid of the language barrier as quickly as if we actually had a dormant ability in our minds to all understand each other like in room.
|
|
This problem is one thing that humanity could actually strike off the list. We don't need billions of dollars to build solar panels on the tops of all the schools in America or a multi-billion dollar grant to fix social security.
|
|
All we need is the internet and our brains. No time to learn a new language, you say? Look, I walk by the Starbucks all the time and I see all these people, people just like you, hang out online.
|
|
You got time to surf the web at Cybercafe. You got time to learn Esperanto. And I have a feeling that if this does catch on, it's going to be with the kids. Just like the HTML thing.
|
|
Well, you know, I've had my space for a while and I'll give an example. When I go to people's random people's mindsets, you know, and I see just the boring old white black text and everything on that.
|
|
I get bored and I don't want to add them. I don't want to message them. I see people with cool mindsets with tons of pictures, flashing scroll bars and all that fun shit.
|
|
I want to add them and message them. I don't want people to see my profile. He's boring. It's an identity to me. I get to show who I really am through this site.
|
|
You know, message boards and people posting pictures of them, pictures of their houses, pictures of their rooms. You know, I want to be a part of that. So I started reading about, you know, reading on sites, pimping in my space and learning HTML through that.
|
|
There is actually one educational organization that is working to put laptop computers into the hands of every child on the planet called one laptop or child.org.
|
|
Many argue that the default language on these computers should be Esperanto. It is possible that these types of international movements could literally sweep across the planet with the internet what it is.
|
|
And if one doesn't start considering this possibility, when and if it actually does happen, they might just be in for a rude awakening.
|
|
Now, I understand people have families in PTA and Rotary clubs and that doesn't leave a lot of free time to take on learning a new language.
|
|
I'm the first one to admit that soccer practice and other time consuming responsibilities come first. So for you family men and women, I say that learning Esperanto could be a fun family activity.
|
|
Well folks, we're out of time. We've come to the end of the show. You've participated, you've learned, you've listened, now go out and contribute.
|
|
Hey, there's actually a website I want to throw out at you all. It's www.esperanto.net. There you can find information about Esperanto in 62, count on 62 different languages.
|
|
And there's also a link on there that takes you to a course that will help you learn Esperanto and that's free of charge.
|
|
Hey, I'm sorry if you don't speak English and you weren't able to understand this show. We're really sorry about that, but it's not our fault.
|
|
Hey, hit that website and have a great life.
|
|
Well, everyone is free to take a walk on a beautiful day like we are like we are.
|
|
All the past is catching up. Future is filled with tears. Seems that we've been astray from our nature for far too many years.
|
|
If it's truly over, I can't wait to start again. I know it could do better. So until then, I'm not in a perfect world.
|
|
Language was the first reason for nationhood. Nations survive only by being territorial. Territorialism is a primary cause of war.
|
|
Nationhood is a man-made distinction and concept. Language is a voluntary method of communication. Communication is broad and is not limited to language.
|
|
Language makes itself ineffective when two different languages attempt to communicate. A system which nullifies its own system is a null system. Language is self perpetuating, encouraging variation and ever mutating in the form of silence.
|
|
Language is subjective even when it has a fixed meaning. People consciously choose to use language as a method of communication.
|
|
People use language in an attempt to communicate ideas which were formed before translated into the form of language. Language is not necessary for understanding or communicating. It is simply a form of communication.
|
|
Language is currently a voluntary added step between an idea being understood by one person and that idea being understood by another.
|
|
We do not think in any language. We translate thoughts into language in order to make them known to others. Language is an ancient and out of date attempt at communication.
|
|
Seeing is no other animal but humans. Other forms of language may exist in some animals but are as yet not understood by humans.
|
|
But seem to express only rudimentary active commando requests. Language is a distinctly human invention based on an attempt to communicate rather than to experience.
|
|
Language is an ancient and out of date attempt to communicate ideas which were formed before translated into the form of language.
|
|
Language is an ancient and out of date attempt to communicate ideas which were formed before translated into the form of language.
|
|
Language is an ancient and out of date attempt to communicate ideas which were formed before translated into the form of language.
|
|
Language is an ancient and out of date attempt to communicate ideas which were formed before translated into the form of language.
|
|
Language is an ancient and out of date attempt to communicate ideas which were formed before translated into the form of language.
|
|
Language is an ancient and out of date attempt to communicate ideas which were formed before translated into the form of language.
|
|
Language is an ancient and out of date attempt to communicate ideas which were formed before translated into the form of language.
|
|
Language is an ancient and out of date attempt to communicate ideas which were formed before translated into the form of language.
|
|
Language is an ancient and out of date attempt to communicate ideas which were formed before translated into the form of language.
|
|
Language is an ancient and out of date attempt to communicate ideas which were formed before translated into the form of language.
|
|
Thank you for watching.
|