All checks were successful
Build App / compute-version (push) Successful in 2s
Build App / build-macos (push) Successful in 2m47s
Build Container / build-container (push) Successful in 9m0s
Build App / build-linux (push) Successful in 4m41s
Build App / build-windows (push) Successful in 5m33s
Build App / create-tag (push) Successful in 3s
Build App / sync-to-github (push) Successful in 10s
The mission-control (Flight Control) project is being closed upstream. This embeds the project files directly in the repo under container/mission-control/, bakes them into the Docker image at /opt/mission-control, and copies them into place at container startup instead of git cloning from GitHub. Also adds missing osc52-clipboard, audio-shim, and triple-c-sso-refresh to the programmatic Docker build context in image.rs. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
183 lines
6.6 KiB
Markdown
183 lines
6.6 KiB
Markdown
# Flight Operations Quick Reference
|
|
|
|
> For full methodology docs, see [mission-control](https://github.com/msieurthenardier/mission-control)
|
|
|
|
## Before You Start
|
|
|
|
**Read these files in order:**
|
|
1. `.flightops/ARTIFACTS.md` — Where and how artifacts are stored (project-specific)
|
|
2. The **flight log** for your active flight — Ground truth for what happened
|
|
3. The **leg artifact** you're implementing — Your acceptance criteria
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Project Crew & Phases
|
|
|
|
Each phase of the Flight Control workflow has a crew definition in `.flightops/agent-crews/`:
|
|
|
|
| Crew | Purpose |
|
|
|------|---------|
|
|
| `mission-design.md` | Crew for `/mission` (e.g., Architect validates viability) |
|
|
| `flight-design.md` | Crew for `/flight` (e.g., Architect reviews spec) |
|
|
| `leg-execution.md` | Crew for `/agentic-workflow` (e.g., Developer + Reviewer) |
|
|
| `flight-debrief.md` | Crew for `/flight-debrief` (e.g., Developer provides perspective) |
|
|
| `mission-debrief.md` | Crew for `/mission-debrief` (e.g., Architect provides perspective) |
|
|
|
|
Crew files define: roles, models, interaction protocols, prompts, and signals. Customize these to change your project's agent configuration.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Multi-Agent Workflow
|
|
|
|
Legs must be implemented by a **separate Developer instance** and reviewed by a **separate Reviewer instance** (or whatever crew is defined in `leg-execution.md`). Mission Control designs legs and orchestrates — it does NOT implement code directly.
|
|
|
|
The Reviewer has no knowledge of the Developer's reasoning — only the resulting changes. This separation provides objective code review. Use the `/agentic-workflow` skill in mission-control to drive this cycle.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## ⚠️ Leg Completion Checklist (MANDATORY)
|
|
|
|
**You MUST complete ALL of these before emitting `[COMPLETE:leg]`:**
|
|
|
|
| Step | Action |
|
|
|------|--------|
|
|
| 1 | All acceptance criteria verified |
|
|
| 2 | Tests passing |
|
|
| 3 | **Update flight log** — Add leg progress entry (see below) |
|
|
| 4 | **Mark leg completed** — Update leg status to `completed` |
|
|
| 5 | **Update flight** — Check off the leg in flight artifact |
|
|
| 6 | **Commit/save with all artifact updates** |
|
|
|
|
**Flight log entry MUST include:**
|
|
- Leg status, started date, completed date
|
|
- Changes Made (what was implemented)
|
|
- Verification (how acceptance criteria were confirmed)
|
|
- Any decisions, deviations, or anomalies
|
|
|
|
Refer to `.flightops/ARTIFACTS.md` for exact locations and formats.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Workflow Signals
|
|
|
|
Emit at the end of your response, on its own line:
|
|
|
|
| Signal | When |
|
|
|--------|------|
|
|
| `[HANDOFF:review-needed]` | Artifact changes ready for validation |
|
|
| `[HANDOFF:confirmed]` | Review complete, no issues |
|
|
| `[BLOCKED:reason]` | Cannot proceed |
|
|
| `[COMPLETE:leg]` | Leg done AND checklist complete |
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Implementing a Leg
|
|
|
|
### Pre-Implementation
|
|
1. Read mission, flight, and leg artifacts
|
|
2. Read flight log for context from prior legs
|
|
3. Verify leg accuracy against existing code
|
|
4. **Update leg status** to `in-flight`
|
|
5. Present summary and get approval before proceeding
|
|
|
|
### Implementation
|
|
5. Implement to acceptance criteria
|
|
6. Run tests with a timeout — use the test runner's timeout flag (e.g., `--timeout`,
|
|
`--test-timeout`, `-timeout`) so hanging tests fail fast instead of stalling.
|
|
If a test hangs, kill it, isolate the hanging test, and fix the root cause before
|
|
continuing. Log hanging tests and their resolution in the flight log.
|
|
7. Run code review, fix Critical/Major issues
|
|
8. Re-review until clean
|
|
|
|
### Post-Implementation
|
|
9. Propagate changes (project docs, flight artifacts if scope changed)
|
|
10. **Complete the Leg Completion Checklist above**
|
|
11. Signal `[COMPLETE:leg]`
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Just-in-Time Planning
|
|
|
|
Flights and legs are created one at a time, not upfront.
|
|
|
|
| Reviewing... | Should exist | Should NOT exist yet |
|
|
|--------------|--------------|----------------------|
|
|
| Mission | Mission artifact | Flight artifacts (only listed) |
|
|
| Flight | Flight artifact | Leg artifacts (only listed) |
|
|
| Leg | Leg artifact | Ready to implement |
|
|
|
|
Listed flights/legs are **tentative suggestions** that evolve based on discoveries.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Reviewing Artifacts
|
|
|
|
When reviewing a mission, flight, or leg:
|
|
|
|
1. Read the artifact thoroughly
|
|
2. Validate against project goals and existing code
|
|
3. Check for ambiguities or missing details
|
|
4. Make changes directly if needed
|
|
5. Describe any changes made
|
|
6. Signal `[HANDOFF:confirmed]` if no issues, or describe changes for validation
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Code Review Gate
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
Implement → Test → Review → Fix → Re-review → Complete
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
| Severity | Action |
|
|
|----------|--------|
|
|
| Critical | Must fix |
|
|
| Major | Must fix |
|
|
| Minor | Fix if safe, else defer |
|
|
|
|
Deferred issues go in the flight log.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## ⚠️ Flight Completion Checklist (MANDATORY)
|
|
|
|
**When you complete the FINAL leg of a flight, also complete these steps:**
|
|
|
|
| Step | Action |
|
|
|------|--------|
|
|
| 1 | Complete all items in the Leg Completion Checklist above |
|
|
| 2 | **Update flight log** — Add flight completion entry with summary |
|
|
| 3 | **Update flight status** — Set `**Status**: landed` in flight.md |
|
|
| 4 | **Update mission** — Check off this flight in mission.md |
|
|
| 5 | **Verify all legs** — Confirm all legs show `completed` status |
|
|
| 6 | **Update project docs** — Ensure CLAUDE.md, README, and other docs reflect any new commands, endpoints, configuration, or APIs introduced during the flight |
|
|
| 7 | Signal `[COMPLETE:leg]` (the orchestrator will trigger Phase 4) |
|
|
|
|
The orchestrator will then:
|
|
- Mark the PR ready for human review
|
|
|
|
The flight debrief is a separate step run via `/flight-debrief`, which transitions the flight from `landed` to `completed`.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Database Schema Changes
|
|
|
|
When a flight modifies database schemas:
|
|
|
|
1. **Include migration steps in the leg** — schema changes need explicit CREATE/ALTER statements or migration commands
|
|
2. **Verify migrations run** — acceptance criteria must include confirming the migration executed successfully against the live database
|
|
3. **Update SCHEMA docs** — if the project maintains a SCHEMA reference, update it in the same leg that creates the migration
|
|
4. **Test against real DB** — unit tests with mocks are not sufficient for schema changes; verify against the actual database
|
|
|
|
A table defined in SCHEMA but never created via migration is a gap — treat schema documentation and migration execution as a single atomic operation.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Key Principles
|
|
|
|
1. **Flight log is ground truth** — Read it first, update it always
|
|
2. **Never modify in-flight legs** — Create new ones instead
|
|
3. **Binary acceptance criteria** — Met or not met
|
|
4. **Log everything** — Decisions, deviations, anomalies
|
|
5. **Signal clearly** — End of response, own line
|