Remove some long-standing commented code (#4242)
This actually was implemented elsewhere for eventing but the commented code wasn't removed. We can finally be free.
This commit is contained in:
1 parent
5505833702
commit
e07503add4
1 file changed
-90
@@ -711,93 +711,3 @@ func wrapHandlerWithCallbackInterceptor(h http.Handler, c *Controller) http.Hand
|
||||
h.ServeHTTP(w, req)
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
func WrapForwardedForHandler(h http.Handler, authorizedAddrs []*sockaddr.SockAddrMarshaler, rejectNotPresent, rejectNonAuthz bool, hopSkips int) http.Handler {
|
||||
return http.HandlerFunc(func(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
|
||||
headers, headersOK := r.Header[textproto.CanonicalMIMEHeaderKey("X-Forwarded-For")]
|
||||
if !headersOK || len(headers) == 0 {
|
||||
if !rejectNotPresent {
|
||||
h.ServeHTTP(w, r)
|
||||
return
|
||||
}
|
||||
respondError(w, http.StatusBadRequest, fmt.Errorf("missing x-forwarded-for header and configured to reject when not present"))
|
||||
return
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
host, port, err := net.SplitHostPort(r.RemoteAddr)
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
// If not rejecting treat it like we just don't have a valid
|
||||
// header because we can't do a comparison against an address we
|
||||
// can't understand
|
||||
if !rejectNotPresent {
|
||||
h.ServeHTTP(w, r)
|
||||
return
|
||||
}
|
||||
respondError(w, http.StatusBadRequest, errwrap.Wrapf("error parsing client hostport: {{err}}", err))
|
||||
return
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
addr, err := sockaddr.NewIPAddr(host)
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
// We treat this the same as the case above
|
||||
if !rejectNotPresent {
|
||||
h.ServeHTTP(w, r)
|
||||
return
|
||||
}
|
||||
respondError(w, http.StatusBadRequest, errwrap.Wrapf("error parsing client address: {{err}}", err))
|
||||
return
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
var found bool
|
||||
for _, authz := range authorizedAddrs {
|
||||
if authz.Contains(addr) {
|
||||
found = true
|
||||
break
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
if !found {
|
||||
// If we didn't find it and aren't configured to reject, simply
|
||||
// don't trust it
|
||||
if !rejectNonAuthz {
|
||||
h.ServeHTTP(w, r)
|
||||
return
|
||||
}
|
||||
respondError(w, http.StatusBadRequest, fmt.Errorf("client address not authorized for x-forwarded-for and configured to reject connection"))
|
||||
return
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// At this point we have at least one value and it's authorized
|
||||
|
||||
// Split comma separated ones, which are common. This brings it in line
|
||||
// to the multiple-header case.
|
||||
var acc []string
|
||||
for _, header := range headers {
|
||||
vals := strings.Split(header, ",")
|
||||
for _, v := range vals {
|
||||
acc = append(acc, strings.TrimSpace(v))
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
indexToUse := len(acc) - 1 - hopSkips
|
||||
if indexToUse < 0 {
|
||||
// This is likely an error in either configuration or other
|
||||
// infrastructure. We could either deny the request, or we
|
||||
// could simply not trust the value. Denying the request is
|
||||
// "safer" since if this logic is configured at all there may
|
||||
// be an assumption it can always be trusted. Given that we can
|
||||
// deny accepting the request at all if it's not from an
|
||||
// authorized address, if we're at this point the address is
|
||||
// authorized (or we've turned off explicit rejection) and we
|
||||
// should assume that what comes in should be properly
|
||||
// formatted.
|
||||
respondError(w, http.StatusBadRequest, fmt.Errorf("malformed x-forwarded-for configuration or request, hops to skip (%d) would skip before earliest chain link (chain length %d)", hopSkips, len(headers)))
|
||||
return
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
r.RemoteAddr = net.JoinHostPort(acc[indexToUse], port)
|
||||
h.ServeHTTP(w, r)
|
||||
return
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
*/
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user