HPR/hpr_hub
5
0
Fork 2
Code Issues 45 Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

New opus feed #41

New Issue
Open
opened 2024-05-31 16:18:44 +00:00 by ken_fallon · 3 comments
ken_fallon commented 2024-05-31 16:18:44 +00:00
Owner
Copy Link

We already produce opus files, so we should have a opus feed.

This should have a ideal name that we never need to change again ;-)

If we follow the convention of ??????(english grammer word here)???? eg 'hosts, series, eps. Then feeds would be logical.

Followed by specific "slug" for the item itself.

Should feeds be in ${WEB_ROOT}/feeds/opus.rss

We already produce opus files, so we should have a opus feed. This should have a ideal name that we never need to change again ;-) If we follow the convention of ??????(english grammer word here)???? eg 'hosts, series, eps. Then feeds would be logical. Followed by specific "[slug](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clean_URL#Slug)" for the item itself. Should feeds be in `${WEB_ROOT}/feeds/opus.rss`
davmo commented 2024-06-04 19:01:28 +00:00
Owner
Copy Link

Is this a hub issue, or is it an issue for the static site, or the hub now but the static site later?

I can add an opus feed to the static site if required.

At the moment all of the static feeds are under public_html, but, as you indicate, having them in a more meaningful hierarchy would be preferable - such as public_html/feeds/. Should this change (which would affect all feeds) be a new issue rather than part of this one?

Is this a hub issue, or is it an issue for the static site, or the hub now but the static site later? I can add an opus feed to the static site if required. At the moment all of the static feeds are under `public_html`, but, as you indicate, having them in a more meaningful hierarchy would be preferable - such as `public_html/feeds/`. Should this change (which would affect all feeds) be a new issue rather than part of this one?
ken_fallon commented 2024-10-21 16:28:23 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

It would probably be easier to implement this as a php addition first.

It would probably be easier to implement this as a php addition first.
ken_fallon commented 2024-10-29 18:35:20 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

Working on getting all the files transcoded

Working on getting all the files transcoded
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
No items
No Label
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
davmo jknapp ken_fallon norrist rho_n
No Assignees
2 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: HPR/hpr_hub#41
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?