Files
site-builder/craft/src/components/forms/ContactForm.toHtml.test.ts
T
shadowdaoandClaude Opus 5 422697acec fix(site-builder): review findings on the webhook destination controls
I-1: WebhookSecretField now mounts with key={selectedId}. GuidedStyles renders
FormStylePanel with no key, so a selection change re-rendered rather than
remounted it and React kept `draft`/`status`. Since a failed store deliberately
retains the draft, clicking a second contact form showed node A's raw secret in
node B's field, and the next blur assigned the returned secret_id to the wrong
form (burning a slot against the per-site cap). The status banner leaked the
same way. Both pinned by the reviewer's repro sequence.

I-2: the button is "Clear", not "Remove", and says so -- nothing deletes a
stored key file, so the 50-per-site cap counts stores-ever. Labelling it Remove
told the customer they had reclaimed a slot right up until the 429 that said
otherwise. Actually deleting the file is Task 8's territory.

M-1: inline warning when the webhook URL is blank or not absolute https. The
publish step does refuse these, but into an error_log the customer never reads.
Warning only -- isHttpsWebhookUrl never edits the value or blocks the publish,
since either would trade a loud server-side refusal for a silently inert form.

M-2: the BYTE-IDENTITY test now compares against a literal marker captured by
executing the emitter at 071f3447, not against another head-revision output. The
self-comparison could only catch a drift affecting one side; a uniform one
passed it. Verified: a uniform `<!-- WHP-FORM` drift now fails this assertion.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-10 15:57:38 -07:00

289 lines
14 KiB
TypeScript

import { describe, test, expect } from 'vitest';
import { ContactForm } from './ContactForm';
const toHtml = (ContactForm as any).toHtml;
describe('ContactForm.toHtml relay wiring', () => {
test('with recipientEmail: emits marker, placeholder action, honeypot', () => {
const { html } = toHtml({ recipientEmail: 'a@b.com', thankYouUrl: '/thx', fields: [] }, '');
expect(html).toMatch(/<!--WHP-FORM id="F_[0-9a-z]+" recipient="a@b.com" thankyou="\/thx"-->/);
expect(html).toMatch(/action="__WHP_FORM_ACTION__F_[0-9a-z]+__"/);
expect(html).toContain('method="POST"');
expect(html).toContain('name="_gotcha"');
// marker id and action id match
const mid = html.match(/id="(F_[0-9a-z]+)"/)![1];
expect(html).toContain(`__WHP_FORM_ACTION__${mid}__`);
});
test('without recipientEmail: no marker, falls back to formAction', () => {
const { html } = toHtml({ formAction: '/legacy', fields: [] }, '');
expect(html).not.toContain('WHP-FORM');
expect(html).toContain('action="/legacy"');
expect(html).not.toContain('_gotcha');
// Backward-compat: ensure non-relay output is byte-identical (no extra blank lines from honeypot)
expect(html).not.toMatch(/<form[^>]*>\n\s*\n/);
});
test('without recipientEmail + real fields: byte-clean legacy output (realistic case)', () => {
// The empty-fields case is NOT byte-identical to the old code (the old
// template emitted a stray whitespace line when fields was empty; the new
// ternary drops it). Real forms always have fields, so pin THAT scenario:
// no marker, no honeypot, and no whitespace-only line between <form> and
// the first field.
const fields = [{ type: 'text', label: 'Name', name: 'name', placeholder: 'Your name', required: true }];
const { html } = toHtml({ formAction: '/legacy', fields }, '');
expect(html).not.toContain('WHP-FORM');
expect(html).not.toContain('_gotcha');
expect(html).toContain('action="/legacy"');
expect(html).not.toMatch(/<form[^>]*>\n\s*\n/);
// First field renders directly after the form tag (no stray blank line).
expect(html).toMatch(/<form[^>]*>\n\s*<div/);
expect(html).toContain('Name');
});
});
describe('ContactForm.toHtml successMessage', () => {
// The published form-sender relay (form-sender/app/submit.php) delivers
// success via a full-page 303 redirect to thankYouUrl or a hosted
// thanks.php page -- there is no in-page JS to reveal an inline success
// element. So successMessage is emitted as a forward-compatible data
// attribute for a future AJAX/JS submission mode, not a live DOM element.
test('with successMessage set: emits it as an escaped data attribute on the form', () => {
const { html } = toHtml({ successMessage: "We'll be in touch!", fields: [] }, '');
expect(html).toContain('data-whp-success-message="We&#39;ll be in touch!"');
});
test('without successMessage: no data attribute emitted', () => {
const { html } = toHtml({ fields: [] }, '');
expect(html).not.toContain('data-whp-success-message');
});
test('escapes attribute-breakout attempts in successMessage', () => {
const { html } = toHtml({ successMessage: 'x" onerror="alert(1)', fields: [] }, '');
expect(html).not.toContain('onerror="alert(1)"');
});
});
describe('ContactForm.toHtml relay marker deterministic + unique via node id (no Math.random)', () => {
test('same node id -> identical marker+placeholder ids across two calls', () => {
const { html: html1 } = toHtml({ recipientEmail: 'a@b.com', thankYouUrl: '/thx', fields: [] }, '', 'node-cf1');
const { html: html2 } = toHtml({ recipientEmail: 'a@b.com', thankYouUrl: '/thx', fields: [] }, '', 'node-cf1');
expect(html1).toBe(html2);
});
test('marker id always equals the placeholder id it pairs with', () => {
const { html } = toHtml({ recipientEmail: 'a@b.com', thankYouUrl: '/thx', fields: [] }, '', 'node-cf1');
const mid = html.match(/<!--WHP-FORM id="([^"]+)"/)![1];
expect(html).toContain(`action="__WHP_FORM_ACTION__${mid}__"`);
});
test('two different node ids -> different fids', () => {
const { html: html1 } = toHtml({ recipientEmail: 'a@b.com', thankYouUrl: '/thx', fields: [] }, '', 'node-cf1');
const { html: html2 } = toHtml({ recipientEmail: 'a@b.com', thankYouUrl: '/thx', fields: [] }, '', 'node-cf2');
const mid1 = html1.match(/<!--WHP-FORM id="([^"]+)"/)![1];
const mid2 = html2.match(/<!--WHP-FORM id="([^"]+)"/)![1];
expect(mid1).not.toBe(mid2);
});
});
describe('ContactForm.toHtml accessibility (F2.1)', () => {
const fields = [
{ type: 'text' as const, label: 'Name', name: 'name', placeholder: 'Your name', required: true },
{ type: 'email' as const, label: 'Email', name: 'email', placeholder: 'you@example.com', required: true },
];
test('each field label for= matches its control id=, and ids are unique', () => {
const { html } = toHtml({ fields }, '');
const labelIds = [...html.matchAll(/<label for="([^"]+)"/g)].map((m) => m[1]);
const controlIds = [...html.matchAll(/<(?:input|textarea|select) id="([^"]+)"/g)].map((m) => m[1]);
expect(labelIds.length).toBe(2);
expect(controlIds.length).toBe(2);
expect(labelIds).toEqual(controlIds);
expect(new Set(controlIds).size).toBe(2);
});
test('ids are deterministic across repeated calls with the same fields', () => {
const { html: html1 } = toHtml({ fields }, '');
const { html: html2 } = toHtml({ fields }, '');
const ids1 = [...html1.matchAll(/<input id="([^"]+)"/g)].map((m) => m[1]);
const ids2 = [...html2.matchAll(/<input id="([^"]+)"/g)].map((m) => m[1]);
expect(ids1).toEqual(ids2);
});
});
describe('ContactForm.toHtml field type attribute sanitization', () => {
test('malicious field.type cannot break out of the input attribute; falls back to type="text"', () => {
const fields = [{ type: 'text"><img src=x onerror=alert(1)>' as any, label: 'Name', name: 'name', placeholder: 'Your name', required: false }];
const { html } = toHtml({ fields }, '');
expect(html).not.toContain('<img');
expect(html).not.toContain('onerror=');
expect(html).toContain('type="text"');
});
test('legitimate email field type still passes through unchanged', () => {
const fields = [{ type: 'email' as const, label: 'Email', name: 'email', placeholder: 'you@example.com', required: false }];
const { html } = toHtml({ fields }, '');
expect(html).toContain('type="email"');
});
});
// F1: the field editor (FormStylePanel) can now create fields of every type
// in sanitizeInputType's allowlist, plus textarea/select. Verify each
// renders with the right control, label/for association, and required flag.
describe('ContactForm.toHtml renders every configured field type/label/required', () => {
const cases: { type: string; tag: string }[] = [
{ type: 'text', tag: 'input' },
{ type: 'email', tag: 'input' },
{ type: 'tel', tag: 'input' },
{ type: 'number', tag: 'input' },
{ type: 'password', tag: 'input' },
{ type: 'url', tag: 'input' },
{ type: 'search', tag: 'input' },
{ type: 'date', tag: 'input' },
{ type: 'checkbox', tag: 'input' },
{ type: 'radio', tag: 'input' },
];
test.each(cases)('type=$type renders a sanitized <$tag type="$type"> with label + for/id wiring', ({ type, tag }) => {
const fields = [{ type: type as any, label: `Field ${type}`, name: `f_${type}`, placeholder: '', required: true }];
const { html } = toHtml({ fields }, '');
expect(html).toContain(`<${tag}`);
expect(html).toContain(`type="${type}"`);
expect(html).toContain(`Field ${type}`);
// required renders the input attribute AND the visual asterisk
expect(html).toMatch(/ required/);
expect(html).toContain('*</span>');
const labelFor = html.match(/<label for="([^"]+)"/)![1];
expect(html).toContain(`id="${labelFor}"`);
});
test('type=textarea renders a <textarea>, not an <input>', () => {
const fields = [{ type: 'textarea' as const, label: 'Message', name: 'message', placeholder: '', required: false }];
const { html } = toHtml({ fields }, '');
expect(html).toMatch(/<textarea[^>]*name="message"/);
expect(html).not.toMatch(/<input[^>]*name="message"/);
});
test('type=select renders a <select> with escaped <option> values from field.options', () => {
const fields = [{ type: 'select' as const, label: 'Plan', name: 'plan', placeholder: 'Choose one', required: false, options: ['Basic', 'Pro', '"><script>alert(1)</script>'] }];
const { html } = toHtml({ fields }, '');
expect(html).toMatch(/<select[^>]*name="plan"/);
expect(html).toContain('<option value="Basic">Basic</option>');
expect(html).toContain('<option value="Pro">Pro</option>');
expect(html).not.toContain('<script>alert(1)</script>');
});
test('a non-required field omits both the required attribute and the asterisk', () => {
const fields = [{ type: 'text' as const, label: 'Nickname', name: 'nickname', placeholder: '', required: false }];
const { html } = toHtml({ fields }, '');
expect(html).not.toMatch(/ required/);
expect(html).not.toContain('*</span>');
});
});
// Box-model / animation / visibility rollout (common enh-batch pattern):
// these are top-level props consumed generically by the export's
// buildDataAttrs() -- this just confirms the defaults are present on
// craft.props so the panel controls render and the props survive save/load.
describe('ContactForm.craft.props includes animation/visibility defaults', () => {
test('has blank/false defaults for animation, animationDelay, hideOnDesktop/Tablet/Mobile', () => {
expect(ContactForm.craft!.props).toMatchObject({
animation: '',
animationDelay: '',
hideOnDesktop: false,
hideOnTablet: false,
hideOnMobile: false,
});
});
});
/* ---------- Webhook destination (Task 10) ----------
This file builds props inline rather than spreading a shared object, so
`defaultProps` is introduced here for the destination cases only; every
pre-existing test above is untouched. */
const defaultProps = { fields: [] as any[], formAction: '#' };
describe('ContactForm.craft.props includes the destination defaults', () => {
// The trap this pins: FormStylePanel renders each destination control behind
// `nodeProps.X !== undefined`, so a prop omitted from these defaults yields an
// invisible control and the whole feature looks like it does nothing.
test('destinationType/webhookUrl/webhookSecretId/webhookAuthMode are all present', () => {
expect(ContactForm.craft!.props).toMatchObject({
destinationType: 'email',
webhookUrl: '',
webhookSecretId: '',
webhookAuthMode: 'signature',
});
});
test('no craft prop holds a raw secret -- only an id', () => {
const keys = Object.keys(ContactForm.craft!.props as object);
expect(keys).toContain('webhookSecretId');
expect(keys.filter((k) => /secret/i.test(k))).toEqual(['webhookSecretId']);
});
});
describe('ContactForm.toHtml destination marker', () => {
test('email destination emits the legacy marker unchanged', () => {
const out = toHtml(
{ ...defaultProps, destinationType: 'email', recipientEmail: 'a@example.com', thankYouUrl: '' }, '');
expect(out.html).toContain('<!--WHP-FORM');
expect(out.html).toContain('recipient="a@example.com"');
expect(out.html).not.toContain('type="webhook"');
});
test('BYTE-IDENTITY: an email destination emits exactly what a pre-feature form emits', () => {
// The guarantee every already-published site depends on: a marker with no
// `type` still provisions an email endpoint, so its bytes must not drift by
// so much as a space.
//
// FROZEN LITERAL, not a self-comparison. Comparing two head-revision outputs
// to each other only catches a drift that affects ONE of them -- a uniform
// change passes it. This string was captured from `071f3447` (the revision
// deployed to production before this feature) and is the actual reference:
// if it has to be edited, every already-published site's forms have changed
// shape and that is the thing to stop, not the test.
const FROZEN_LEGACY_MARKER =
'<!--WHP-FORM id="F_3hodg" recipient="a@example.com" thankyou="/thx"-->';
const legacy = toHtml({ ...defaultProps, recipientEmail: 'a@example.com', thankYouUrl: '/thx' }, '', 'n1');
expect(legacy.html.startsWith(`${FROZEN_LEGACY_MARKER}<form `)).toBe(true);
// ...and the new props, set to their defaults, change nothing about it.
const explicit = toHtml(
{ ...defaultProps, destinationType: 'email', webhookUrl: '', webhookSecretId: '',
webhookAuthMode: 'signature', recipientEmail: 'a@example.com', thankYouUrl: '/thx' }, '', 'n1');
expect(explicit.html).toBe(legacy.html);
});
test('webhook destination emits type, url, secret id and auth mode', () => {
const out = toHtml(
{ ...defaultProps, destinationType: 'webhook', webhookUrl: 'https://hooks.example.com/x',
webhookSecretId: 'sec-1', webhookAuthMode: 'bearer', recipientEmail: 'fb@example.com' }, '');
expect(out.html).toContain('type="webhook"');
expect(out.html).toContain('url="https://hooks.example.com/x"');
expect(out.html).toContain('secret="sec-1"');
expect(out.html).toContain('authmode="bearer"');
expect(out.html).toContain('recipient="fb@example.com"');
});
test('a raw secret value is never emitted, only its id', () => {
const out = toHtml(
{ ...defaultProps, destinationType: 'webhook', webhookUrl: 'https://hooks.example.com/x',
webhookSecretId: 'sec-1', webhookSecret: 'SUPERSECRET' } as any, '');
// Non-vacuous: the marker IS emitted (so there is something that could have
// carried the secret) and carries the id, but not the value.
expect(out.html).toContain('secret="sec-1"');
expect(out.html).not.toContain('SUPERSECRET');
});
test('a webhook form with no fallback email still emits a marker (never a bare formAction)', () => {
const out = toHtml(
{ ...defaultProps, destinationType: 'webhook', webhookUrl: 'https://hooks.example.com/x' }, '');
expect(out.html).toContain('type="webhook"');
expect(out.html).toContain('recipient=""');
expect(out.html).toMatch(/action="__WHP_FORM_ACTION__F_[0-9a-z]+__"/);
expect(out.html).toContain('name="_gotcha"');
});
});