- MCP server with stdio transport for local use - Search episodes, transcripts, hosts, and series - 4,511 episodes with metadata and transcripts - Data loader with in-memory JSON storage 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
348 lines
30 KiB
Plaintext
348 lines
30 KiB
Plaintext
Episode: 4388
|
|
Title: HPR4388: BSD Overview
|
|
Source: https://hub.hackerpublicradio.org/ccdn.php?filename=/eps/hpr4388/hpr4388.mp3
|
|
Transcribed: 2025-10-26 00:05:46
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
This is Hacker Public Radio Episode 4388 for Wednesday the 28th of May 2025.
|
|
Today's show is entitled BSD Overview.
|
|
It is hosted by Norrist and is about 43 minutes long.
|
|
It carries a clean flag.
|
|
The summary is Norrist describes how you can be a real hacker and run BSD.
|
|
So I wanted to give kind of an intro or an overview of the BSDs and maybe a little bit
|
|
about how I know BSDs.
|
|
Personally I use free BSD and open BSD around the house quite a bit.
|
|
I've never had a job where I'm used either one but I use them at home a lot.
|
|
There's also net BSD, I don't use that very much.
|
|
I've installed it a few times just to kind of mess around with it but it never really
|
|
stuck around.
|
|
That doesn't have anything to do with the capabilities of net BSD.
|
|
It's just not something that stuck around for me.
|
|
And then there's another kind of a big BSD called Dragonfly BSD.
|
|
I'm going to kind of intentionally leave that one out of the discussion mostly because
|
|
the development on that project has really slowed down in the last few years.
|
|
It had some momentum for several years and had some really cool technologies kind of
|
|
coming out of it, especially the file system.
|
|
There's a hammer file system.
|
|
But like I said, that's slowed down and I don't really know the feature of the Dragonfly
|
|
BSD.
|
|
So other than what we just talked about, I'll probably leave that one out.
|
|
So there's been a handful of HPR episodes already on BSDs.
|
|
Probably the quickest way to find some is to look at the tags page on HPR.
|
|
There's several BSD related tags.
|
|
And there's been a few hosts that have done several BSD related podcasts.
|
|
Claudio Miranda's got a few.
|
|
I've got a few where in episode 3, 7, 9, 9, I talked about my home routers and I mentioned
|
|
that I used Open BSD there.
|
|
In 3, 1, 8, 7, I talked about using Ansible to manage my home routers that run Open BSD.
|
|
That was like Swakad ad host to the DHCP configs and to the local DNS.
|
|
What else?
|
|
3, 1, 6, 8.
|
|
I did an episode on using 3 BSD Jails.
|
|
3 BSD Jails or it's like Jails are like a container technology.
|
|
If you're familiar with Docker, it's not exactly like Docker, but it's the same kind of virtualization.
|
|
But it's a good way to run applications in isolation.
|
|
So that was, I talked about that in 3, 1, 6, 8, and then lay back in 21-81, I talked
|
|
about launching the Open BSD installer from Grub, I don't.
|
|
The point of that episode was if you had a Linux, that you wanted to install Open BSD on,
|
|
this was kind of a shortcut to loading up the installer, I don't think it works anymore
|
|
though, the Grub supports loading BSD kernels, but I think for a few years now that hasn't
|
|
been turned on by default in the Linux distributions, I don't know specifically if you look at
|
|
like the Red Hat, Enterprise Linux, and its derivatives, it worked in Rail 7 and
|
|
it's into S7, but it hasn't worked in like 8 or non, so that episode probably deserves
|
|
an update, but anyway that's sort of a quick overview of my experience, and we'll talk
|
|
a little bit more about how I use BSD, so just kind of a really quick, I'm going to touch
|
|
just briefly on, very briefly on the history of BSD and what it is and kind of where it
|
|
comes from, I've got a couple of Wikipedia links in the show notes, the first one is
|
|
a history of BSD, and it's pretty long, kind of the key takeaway and I'll read a quote,
|
|
it's the history of the Berkeley software distribution, began in the 70s when at UC Berkeley
|
|
received a copy of Unix, the professors and students at the university began adding
|
|
software to the OS and released it as BSD to select universities, so what that means
|
|
is that the original Unix was given to these universities and they started adding things
|
|
to it, little bits here and there, and the little bits here and there turned into BSD,
|
|
so BSD is a direct descendent of the original Unix, then the other Wikipedia article I have
|
|
listed in the show notes is a comparison of the BSDs, and it's a good place to start
|
|
if you want to know more or learn more about the BSDs because one gives kind of a quick
|
|
intro to each of the BSDs and then it's like the page says it gives comparisons between
|
|
the BSDs and also it lists some of the derivatives, so for the free BSD project it will list some
|
|
other projects that have been based on free BSD, it's an interesting read, even if you
|
|
don't intend to install or use BSD, so because I'm pretty sure for the most part, HPR listeners
|
|
are familiar with Linux, I'll kind of start with Linux and make some comparisons of the BSDs
|
|
to Linux and just this kind of a jumping off point to talk about what BSD is, so when I make
|
|
some comparisons I want to be sure and emphasize that me personally, I'm not saying one is better
|
|
than the other, so when I talk about licensing I'm trying really hard not to say that
|
|
one type of license is better than another type of license or one type of way to manage
|
|
network cars is better than another type of way, I'm just pointing out the differences if it sounds
|
|
like expressing a preference that one is better over the other, I'm not, so the first thing
|
|
that's kind of different between BSD and Linux is, like I already mentioned, BSD is a direct
|
|
descendant of the original Unix, where Linux and sort of the typical pieces of software we
|
|
think about in a Linux distribution, like the kernel, the Linux kernel and the GNU
|
|
utilities and other bits that make up that operating system, you know those things were
|
|
written to be compatible with and to emulate the original Unix, but the BSDs are direct descendants
|
|
of the original Unix, the next thing we'll talk about with the BSDs is the, when we talk about
|
|
free BSD or open BSD, these aren't distributions like you would think about a Linux distribution,
|
|
it's not the free BSD versus open BSD, it's very different than comparing
|
|
Fedora to Ubuntu, so the BSDs longed, they started as a singular project coming out of Berkeley
|
|
and long, long time ago they split and split a couple more times and we have kind of the
|
|
three main projects today and they're all sort of direct descendants from the same place, but
|
|
they're very different projects now and they're not, you know free BSD is not a BSD distribution,
|
|
open BSD is not a BSD distribution, they're just, they're different projects with similar names
|
|
similar but the same origin, kind of the next compare some of the Linux we'll talk about is the
|
|
license, you've probably heard the term BSD style license before, if you haven't, the BSD
|
|
software license, there's not, well first there's not like a singular BSD license, there's several
|
|
licenses under different names, they're all a little bit different, but sort of the key to a BSD
|
|
licenses, one they're really simple, they're usually will fit on a page, you know if you're looking
|
|
at it, you can kind of see the whole thing at once and then sort of just to kind of quickly
|
|
summarize what a BSD license is, it basically says you can take this code and do anything you want
|
|
as long as you don't say that you wrote it, that's really, most of the time that's really the
|
|
only restrictions with a BSD license and I'm going to compare that to a copy left license,
|
|
something like the GPL, which Linux and most of the kind of Linux related software is released
|
|
under the copy left license, typically the GPL version two or three, and with that you know it's
|
|
similar to the BSD license where you can take the code, you can do anything you want with it,
|
|
as long as sort of the real key with these licenses is if you make any additions or derivative
|
|
works, those have to be under the same license, under the same copy left license, so just to kind
|
|
of put a fun point on it, if you have a, if you take a BSD license project and you make some changes
|
|
to it, those changes are yours and they belong to you and you don't necessarily have to license them
|
|
in a certain way or make them public or anything like that, whereas with a copy left license,
|
|
any additions or derivative works have to come under the copy left license,
|
|
so all right that's enough about license, another kind of key difference between the BSD projects
|
|
and what we typically think of as a Linux project is the BSD projects are,
|
|
everything is developed together under a single project and what I mean by that is the same project
|
|
and the same team will be doing work on the kernel, but they'll also be doing you know the same team
|
|
and the same project might be working on the C libraries or the kind of a core utility like
|
|
Grapor said, all these things, the kernel and all the things we typically think of as part of an operating
|
|
system, all these things are developed together in a single project, so the free BSD, open BSD,
|
|
net BSD, they're all doing all of the operating system work together and kind of compare that to
|
|
something like Fedora or Ubuntu, you know you've got a team doing the kernel and you've got another team
|
|
doing Grapor and another team doing said and it's the job of the distribution is to take all
|
|
these different parts and put them together into something we we think of as like a Linux distribution.
|
|
Most of the software that you typically think about has been able to run on Linux is going to be
|
|
available on most of the BSDs, there's going to be exceptions just like there are to everything,
|
|
but you know things like LibreOffice and Firefox and GNOME, KDE, BLC, FFMPEG, all these things are
|
|
that you're used to working with are available and can be built on a BSD. Speaking of software,
|
|
I'll mention ports and packages real quick, all of the BSDs have something called ports
|
|
or you may hear to it refer to as a port tree, what that is is ports or a port tree is a collection
|
|
of instructions to build software and if you're familiar with Gentoo or some other Linux
|
|
distribution that's source-based it's kind of like that where if you want to install some software
|
|
using a ports package you would find the specific instructions for that and the ports are in a
|
|
big giant directory it's kind of divided up by purpose so let's say you wanted to install something
|
|
like VLC you could find the VLC directory CD into the VLC directory and type of command something
|
|
like make install or something like that and then that would download the software and build
|
|
it and install it for you and any dependency would check for dependencies and if there's some
|
|
dependencies that it needs it would download and install those too so that is ports I'll compare
|
|
that to something called packages and this is more typical of what a Linux system would have
|
|
where the development team would do the compilation step for you and just give you the output or
|
|
make the output available for you to install so if you're on Fedora or Ubuntu or something like
|
|
that you want to install VLC you can just type DNF install VLC or apt install VLC so that is ports versus
|
|
packages all of the BSDs have ports and all of the BSDs also have packages so if you're on
|
|
pre BSD and you want to install VLC you got two ways to do it you can download the ports
|
|
CD into the ports directory for VLC and type make install and it'll do all the work for you
|
|
or you can do it the easy way into type package install VLC so that's ports versus packages
|
|
or ports as instructions for installing software packages are like pre-built software like
|
|
we used to with AfterYum something like that kind of the final comparison I'll make to Linux is
|
|
how some devices are named it might catch you by surprise specifically with network adapters
|
|
and disks so in the BSDs typically the network adapters are named after the driver
|
|
that that network adapter is using for example a very common driver is called the EM echo mic
|
|
EM driver that's the driver for Intel network cards so if you have two Intel network cards the
|
|
first one is going to be called EM0 and the second one is going to be called EM1 and if you got
|
|
another one named that uses the RAD driver I'm just making stuff up RAD if you got two of those it'll
|
|
be RAD0 and RAD1 and if you've got one EM and one RAD there'll be RAD0 and EM0 and that's different
|
|
you know used to be with Linux everything was ETH0 now I don't know I can't really keep up with
|
|
I don't know where the NENS 160 I don't know where they come from anymore but
|
|
the network card the names will be different between BSD and Linux so that's just something to look
|
|
out for the other thing to look out for is disks and partitions and file systems
|
|
just to give you a warning they are under the hood it's the same but they frequently refer to
|
|
them differently and it's very easy to get yourself in trouble if you have some Linux knowledge
|
|
and you're trying to apply that to a BSD system so it's not impossible to learn the BSD
|
|
disk management commands but I'll just say if you're going to work with disks and BSD be careful
|
|
do it somewhere where it doesn't matter do it on a spare disk or somewhere that you don't have
|
|
to back up you can destroy the disk so now I'll dig into each of the BSDs a little bit maybe talk
|
|
about like what what kind of separates them a little bit maybe what's what's unique or distinctive
|
|
about open versus free versus net BSD what are some standouts so first is free BSD it is
|
|
generally accepted to be the most popular and most widely used you know there's really no
|
|
real way to know that but most people assume probably correctly that most BSD usage is free BSD
|
|
free BSD has a lot of commercial projects that are based on free BSD and I won't name them because
|
|
I'll probably if I tried to I'll probably get it wrong but there's a lot of commercial projects that
|
|
are if it's based on BSD it's probably based on free BSD and most of that is due to the you know
|
|
we were talking about earlier with the license the premise of license one thing that's really
|
|
really stands out about free BSD a big feature is it's tightly integrated with ZFS the kind of
|
|
next generation file system it is it natively supports free BSD natively supports ZFS or the ZFS
|
|
supports built into the kernel with you know Linux projects there's some debate about whether or not
|
|
you can include the ZFS code because of the license if you can include it with the kernel some people
|
|
again not it's not for me to know or decide but there does seem to be some incompatibilities
|
|
between them ZFS license and the DPL that's not an issue with free BSD because it's not under
|
|
the DPL so the ZFS code is right in free BSD so you don't there's no extra work or anything you have
|
|
to do to get ZFS work in and then a lot of the tools will have ZFS integration for example whenever
|
|
you if you do if you stick to the defaults when you do the installation you'll be using ZFS
|
|
partitions and then whenever you do something like updates it will automatically ZFS will automatically
|
|
take a snapshot and there will be something called a boot environment so when you reboot
|
|
you'll be given the option to delete into an old an old snapshot if you need to
|
|
another feature that really stands out with free BSD or jails I mentioned jails a little bit already
|
|
but it's a virtualization it's a way to virtualize and separate processes so it's like you get
|
|
if you're running if you have free BSD and use jails it's like you can have a second copy
|
|
of free BSD running inside of free BSD and that's what a jail is it's just like another
|
|
free BSD system that runs in charge or main free BSD system and it's really useful for
|
|
experimenting or running applications and there's a few tools I use IO cage that's a good tool
|
|
you don't you don't necessarily need an extra tool to manage free BSD jails but it can help
|
|
and then the other notable thing about free BSD is it's the base for a lot of
|
|
open source sort of appliance like distributions so primarily I'm thinking about firewall
|
|
appliances like pfSense and openSense and then previously it's changing now but free NAS and true NAS
|
|
NAS obviously NAS based operating systems with built-in features for like
|
|
making it really easy to set up file shares or things like that now they're newer versions are
|
|
not based on free BSD anymore but that's sort of the heritage of that project is free BSD based
|
|
next on the list is open BSD it is probably most well-known for us it's focus on security
|
|
that is almost a little backwards because it is a very secure OS but and the developers do focus
|
|
on security but their kind of main focus is on writing a correct operating system so
|
|
you know just it's a downstream effect of writing correct code and doing things the right way
|
|
downstream effect of that is that it's also a very secure operating system so the open BSD project is
|
|
a lot of times they're the first OS to introduce new features specifically around security
|
|
so things like ASLR or address space layout randomization it's something that all the operating
|
|
systems do now but open BSD is the one that's sort of developed and paved the way sort of proved out
|
|
that that technology can be implemented operating system wide and they'll do other things like
|
|
kernel relinking every time you reboot it sort of rearranges the kernel so the next time you
|
|
reboot it'll be the same kernel but everything's in a slightly different place in memory so it
|
|
makes it basically impossible to do to take advantage of security vulnerabilities that depend on
|
|
specific pieces of code being in specific places in memory open BSD does a lot of things to sort of
|
|
mitigate those types of vulnerabilities open BSD is the home of several projects
|
|
that have sort of made their way out into the wider ecosystem most notable is open SSH I know
|
|
everybody that's listening to me right now has used SSH or open SSH and that the open SSH you are
|
|
using is comes from the open BSD project they develop it for themselves and then make it available
|
|
to everyone else something else that's kind of distinctive about open BSD is it in the base
|
|
installation it includes Xorg and a very minimal window manager so with the other BSDs and with a
|
|
lot of Linuxes when you do kind of the base install you just get a console and a bunch of utilities
|
|
but with open BSD it comes with like I said Xorg and a display log-in manager and I think
|
|
it's FVWM is the one it ships with but it's not it's not pretty to look at but sort of the
|
|
default install like I said includes if you choose if you choose to enable it or and boot it sort
|
|
of comes with a log-in manager and a window manager and then finally for open BSD the last thing
|
|
I'll say about it is that its documentation is extraordinarily good and specifically the man
|
|
pages if you're someone who struggles reading man pages or has a hard time bonding information
|
|
in man pages that's just because a lot of man pages aren't easy to read they're not easy for
|
|
users to read open BSD man pages are an exception of that they're very straightforward very easy to
|
|
use very easy to understand and the key is they always have examples at the bottom so if you're
|
|
looking for some new software you want to try out and you're not quite sure how to do it or how to
|
|
use it you open the man page and you read through it and you still you're not any closer to actually
|
|
being able to use it than you were before if you can look at an open BSD man page it's just so
|
|
refreshing to see an example that's probably what you want to do probably the reason you open
|
|
the man page is to learn how to do something and that something is probably going to be spelled out
|
|
at the end of the man page exactly what you want so that's the last thing I'll say about
|
|
open BSD the document all of the BSD projects have good documentation the open BSD documentation is
|
|
phenomenal the last one on the list is net BSD and unfortunately I don't have a lot to say about it
|
|
because like I said earlier very minimal exposure to it it's not something of a brand
|
|
with any for any real purpose other than just when installing that BSD you just kind of see what it
|
|
is that's really all I've ever done with it the two things I know they really stand out about it one
|
|
is that it's one of the project goals is to support the widest amount of hardware available
|
|
so net BSD will run on things that no other operating system will run on if it's a computer with
|
|
a CPU and RAM regardless of the architecture when it was built who built it how unique it is there's
|
|
a pretty good chance that net BSD won't run on it the other thing it's kind of a standout for
|
|
net BSD is the packaging system it's called package src package src it is built to be portable so
|
|
what that means is even though it's it's intended for net BSD it's the default on net BSD you can
|
|
also install it on other unixes so if for some reason you're not happy with the package manager on
|
|
your flavor of unix you can go to the the net BSD site has instructions for using their packages
|
|
and their package manager on your flavor of unix including Linux or sleras or several others but
|
|
they build their packages with the intent of making it available to not just their project but to
|
|
other projects so next I'll talk about how me personally how I use BSD where I use it sometimes
|
|
the wires sometimes the wires are just arbitrary but maybe it'll help help you kind of figure out
|
|
if you want to use BSD and how and where you might want to use it so the first thing I'll mention
|
|
is my home router I go in a little more detail in the hpr episode I mentioned earlier but
|
|
my network is sort of the entry into my home network is bounded by a router historically it's
|
|
ran open BSD and I have to recently migrate from open BSD to free BSD and really the only
|
|
reason I've had to updone that is because the I needed to upgrade the hardware from a home router
|
|
wanted to get some like 2.5 gigabit networking and open BSD supports 2.5 gigabit networking but
|
|
I kept buying these cheap firewall appliances I'll AliExpress and I bought a couple different ones
|
|
and they both have the same problem where the on paper open BSD supports them but in reality I
|
|
ran to a lot of problems doing the installation and getting the keeping the network adapters working
|
|
through through the installation process and then after but with free BSD they worked just
|
|
on so I was able to port all of my configs and everything from open BSD to free BSD haven't had
|
|
any trouble that was about a year ago so for years and years I ran open BSD as sort of my home
|
|
gateway firewall appliance and recently switched to free BSD.
|
|
So the next place I use BSD at home is like workstation so I've got a laptop and a desktop
|
|
the laptop dual boots arch Linux and open BSD I've given you some warnings about dual
|
|
booting and I'll probably mention it one more time it's definitely possible to dual boot
|
|
BSD and Linux or BSD and Windows but you just need to be really careful if you do it
|
|
so having given having given you that warning one of the ways I use open BSD is on a laptop
|
|
like I said I'll dual boot just kind of go back and forth between the two one downside using open BSD
|
|
is that because they focus on code correctness they weren't happy with their implementation of
|
|
the Bluetooth stack and they didn't really they didn't have the developer to work on it
|
|
and it was the code was getting kind of old and they weren't happy with it anyway so
|
|
instead of leaving something there that they didn't like they just took it out so open BSD doesn't
|
|
have any Bluetooth support which on a laptop is a little limiting especially if you're using
|
|
like Bluetooth headphones and stuff but otherwise open BSD runs just on a it's on a think pad it's
|
|
well supported on open BSD as well supported on think pads the other way I use open BSD is I'm
|
|
going to as a workstation is I've got a look at a kind of old desktop form factor PC that I use
|
|
to do my banking and financial kind of stuff on and I do that mostly because I like having a
|
|
separate system for doing sensitive work I just don't want to risk accidentally leaking some
|
|
banking credentials or something like that and since I'm going to have something separate it may
|
|
as well be something that I feel good about the security so I have an open BSD system I turn it on
|
|
just you know maybe once a week log in do whatever financial or baking work I need to do and then
|
|
turn it off and you know like I said earlier all of the kind of all of the software that you're
|
|
used to on Linux is probably going to be available on BSD so I'm able to use Firefox and
|
|
LibreOffice and all these all these things work just fine on open BSD so I don't have any trouble
|
|
using open BSD to take care of my kind of everyday everyday sort of normal work
|
|
and then last place I use BSD at home is with like my home NAS runs free BSD
|
|
sort of a quick history many many years ago I bought like an old HP micro server it's a
|
|
roast kind of a small form factor server it's got four disk bays in the front when I bought it
|
|
I put originally put a true NAS on it and then decided to just bite the bullet and go just like
|
|
straight plain old free BSD and so I would use it like I said for a NAS so lots of storage and
|
|
network shares and then out of jails on it for running like self hosted apps run those things
|
|
inside BSD jails and I'm going to use the ZFS pools for the storage at some point a couple of
|
|
years ago I wanted to upgrade my home server hardware and when I when I did that I decided to use
|
|
Proxmox instead of as sort of on the bare metal that way I could do you know I have some other
|
|
virtual machines and stuff so what I did was installed free BSD you know Proxmox VM and then
|
|
just took the disks out of the HP micro server put them in the Proxmox server and just did
|
|
like a disk pass through so the VM sees it as just just sees the raw disks and it's the same
|
|
disk that I was using before and I was able to copy the configs over so my free BSD NAS even though
|
|
it's a virtual machine it's just running free BSD directly connected to drives and I use it the same
|
|
way just NAS storage CFS NFS Samba as well as having some self hosted home lab kind of applications
|
|
running in free BSD jails so a few recommendations if you want to try out BSD what what these are some
|
|
I'd recommend you try one if you want to try out a building your own home router I would go two
|
|
different ways if you really want to dig in and learn and write some configs and do a bunch of
|
|
DIY stuff I'd personally I'd start with open BSD just because the documentation is so good if
|
|
you don't want to do that any of the BSDs will work just fine and then if you want something a little
|
|
easier to manage a little more familiar to manage if you started with something like open
|
|
sense or PF sense these are appliances that are based on free BSD that have like a web management
|
|
UI and it would be really similar to like man if you have a home router with DDW RT or something
|
|
like that you could basically get the same experience just getting some old computer hardware put a
|
|
couple of network adapters in it and install open sense and then they would give you sort of some
|
|
easy exposure to BSD as a home router next recommendation is if you have a think pad that you're
|
|
not really doing anything else with try open BSD on it open BSD is very well supported on think pads
|
|
because the open BSD project is the developers make that project for themselves and then they
|
|
just kind of share it with everyone else so because of that they do a lot of dog fooding they all
|
|
work on open BSD to develop open BSD so and a lot of the developers have think pads so think pads
|
|
good laptops everything is going to work just fine on them but they're particularly open BSD is
|
|
particularly well suited for think pads because that's what a lot of the developers have
|
|
if you have some other hardware or you don't want to use open BSD as a workstation or desktop or
|
|
laptop the next thing I'd recommend is one of there's two derivatives of free BSD that are sort of
|
|
desktop focused ghost BSD or midnight BSD or the two that I'm thinking about I've never used
|
|
either one but I haven't heard anything about them and they are just sort of um
|
|
they're free BSD based they're really the free BSD true free BSD under the hood
|
|
they just come with some little some extras and some uh it help you get
|
|
desktops going so if you want to try um free BSD or any of the BSDs on a desktop
|
|
either ghost or midnight BSD or you know free BSD isn't by itself isn't all that hard to
|
|
get going on a desktop or workstation but might be a little easier to start with something like
|
|
ghost BSD or midnight BSD then if you've got a server or something like that you want to set up
|
|
um free BSD is a great server OS I've talked about how I use it with zfs and jails
|
|
um if you've got a kind of a little weird piece of hardware maybe like a raspberry power or
|
|
something all the BSDs that will support it but um it'll be a good chance to try net BSD because
|
|
they'll have really good support for all kinds of warehouse hardware um and then the last thing
|
|
I'll leave you with is I think this is the third time I've given you the warning um disc management
|
|
on BSD um is it's not harder to do is just different so um if you're used to managing disk
|
|
with Linux or using the Linux commands um that might not help you um managing disk and
|
|
partitions and dual booting and things like that might not help you do those things on BSD so
|
|
just keep that in mind um if you want to try BSD I encourage you to use real hardware um but at the
|
|
same time I'll say uh when you do the installation if you can uh install it on a disk uh just maybe
|
|
you have a spare disk or a spare laptop or something like that or if you uh make a mistake and
|
|
override a partition or override a disk you you want to do that on some hardware where it doesn't
|
|
matter um it's not impossible to dual boot uh BSD and Linux I do it uh but like I said it's
|
|
it can be tricky uh so avoid it if you can use real hardware if you can but avoid dual booting
|
|
again uh and with that warning I think that's all uh had to talk about so try BSD it's um it's a
|
|
little different than Linux it's a little um uh like an uncanny valley kind of situation where it's
|
|
familiar but just a little different but um it's worth trying out it's worth using um then you
|
|
can always claim to be a real hacker uh if you can run open BSD or free BSD all right that's it
|
|
I'll see you on the next one
|
|
you have been listening to Hacker Public Radio at Hacker Public Radio does work
|
|
today's show was contributed by a HBR listener like yourself if you ever thought of recording
|
|
and click on our contribute link to find out how easy it really is hosting for HBR has been
|
|
kindly provided by an onsthost.com the internet archive and our synch.net on the Sadois status
|
|
today's show is released on our creative commons attribution 4.0 international license
|