fix(config): write blocked_ips.map atomically; close review gaps

Follow-up to 9d16151 (take the rollback backup BEFORE writing the new config).
Review findings, none of them blockers, plus two corrections to the record.

blocked_ips.map was still written with a plain open(path,'w'). `haproxy -c`
LOADS that file - hap_listener.tpl matches on
map_ip(/etc/haproxy/blocked_ips.map,0) - and a half-written final line is a
FATAL config error, not one dropped entry. Verified against HAProxy 2.8: a
truncated "198.51.10" gives "is not a valid IPv4 or IPv6 address at line 2 of
file ..." and the whole configuration is rejected. That is precisely the
failure shape the backup-ordering fix exists to prevent, on a different file,
reachable from all five /api/blocked-ips routes. It now goes through the same
write_config_atomically() as haproxy.cfg and coraza-spoe.cfg. (A truncation
that happens to land on a line boundary is not fatal - it silently drops
blocks - which is its own reason to write the file atomically.)

The previous commit message claimed the fast path adds "no `haproxy -c`
latency to customer-facing API calls". That was measured on an idle box and is
false in this fleet's normal pattern: update_blocked_ips_map() is called from
those five routes OUTSIDE generate_config(), so the live map drifts from its
backup and the NEXT config change misses create_backup()'s fast path. Measured
`haproxy -c` runs per domain add: 1 steady state, 2 after an IP block. This
fleet blocks IPs automatically, so the 2x recurred on the customer-facing call
indefinitely. update_blocked_ips_map() now promotes the map it just wrote to
its backup, restoring the steady state - guarded twice: nothing is promoted
unless a config backup set already exists (never fabricate a rollback target),
and not unless the map parses as IPs/CIDRs, so promotion cannot leave a
"rollback target" HAProxy would refuse to load. generate_config() passes
promote_backup=False: it took the snapshot moments earlier and the map is part
of the not-yet-validated change, so refreshing the backup there would be the
original bug again. The remaining 2 is the first generation after this upgrade
(coraza-spoe.cfg has no backup yet); that is once per host, by construction.

Two claims in 9d16151's message are wrong and are corrected here rather than by
rewriting a pushed commit:

* "12 of the 17 fail against the previous code" - it is 14 of 17 (6 failures +
  8 errors). 12 was measured before two fast-path tests were added and never
  re-measured.
* "a missing haproxy binary is not read as a bad config" - true of
  create_backup() only. validate_haproxy_config() collapses both 'invalid' and
  'unavailable' to False, so in the reload path a missing validator still
  triggers a full rollback labelled "Config validation failed". The behaviour
  is right (without a working validator we cannot claim the new config is
  safe, and the reload path is where guessing wrong takes the edge down); the
  sentence was broader than the code. Now documented on the function.

Tests: 26 (was 17), all green; 22 fail against main. New coverage closes the
review's mutation survivors:

* the "Refusing to regenerate config" guard, previously entirely uncovered;
* the invalid/unavailable split, previously zero coverage - both the verdict
  and the consequence create_backup() draws from it;
* the byte-compare loop, with a same-size-different-content config, which is
  the exact case the "not filecmp.cmp" rationale exists for. Building that
  fixture found a bug in the test itself: sizing the drifted config with
  len(str) instead of bytes made it pass for the wrong reason, because the
  rendered config contains non-ASCII.
* test_failed_write_leaves_the_previous_file_intact was vacuous: its bare
  assertRaises(Exception) swallowed the AttributeError from
  write_config_atomically not existing, so it passed against main and would
  have kept passing if the function were deleted. Narrowed to TypeError -
  proven by deleting the function and watching it go red.
* test_backup_set_covers_every_file_generate_config_writes restated the three
  files it expected, so it could never have noticed a fourth. It now derives
  the set - observed on disk for the branches the fixture can execute, read
  out of generate_config()'s source for the env-gated one that writes a
  hardcoded /etc/haproxy path - and requires anything unbacked-up to be on a
  documented exclusion list (suspended_domains.list, cluster-secret, each with
  its reason). Proven by adding a fourth written file and watching it fail.

Every change above was mutation-proved: 11 mutations, 0 survivors, each
reddening only the tests that cover it. Two review items were confirmed
untestable in-process and are deliberately skipped: the fsync (M11) and a
log-line-only mutation (M15).

Left alone deliberately, all pre-existing on main and unchanged here: the
outer `except Exception` in reload_haproxy_safely() does not roll back (narrow
window, now commented at the site); stale .tmp files after SIGKILL are never
swept (verified inert - nothing globs /etc/haproxy, and the only
directory-wide load is `crt /etc/haproxy/certs`, which nothing here writes to);
a partial backup-copy failure can leave a mixed-vintage backup set (very
narrow, and generate_config() correctly refuses to write).

VERSION stays 2026.08.1. NOTE: fix/cert-write-safety, which is stacked on this
branch, carries the same 2026.08.1. If both land on main as separate commits,
CI pushes :2026.08.1 twice with different content. Either that branch moves to
2026.08.2 or the two land as a single merge - not decided here.

No template, QUIC or HTTP/3 changes.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
2026-08-06 09:45:35 -07:00
co-authored by Claude Opus 5
parent 9d16151120
commit 233044fb1d
2 changed files with 427 additions and 16 deletions
+316 -8
View File
@@ -31,8 +31,10 @@ __BROKEN__, which is how the tests inject an invalid configuration.
"""
import os
import re
import sys
import shutil
import inspect
import sqlite3
import logging
import tempfile
@@ -412,12 +414,79 @@ class TestBackupPrimitives(RollbackTestCase):
self.assertEqual(self.read(hm.HAPROXY_BACKUP_PATH), good)
def test_backup_set_covers_every_file_generate_config_writes(self):
pairs = dict(hm._config_backup_pairs())
for path in (hm.HAPROXY_CONFIG_PATH, hm.BLOCKED_IPS_MAP_PATH,
hm.CORAZA_SPOE_CONFIG_PATH):
self.assertIn(path, pairs,
f'{path} is written by generate_config() but is not '
'part of the backed-up config set')
"""Derived, not restated.
An earlier version of this test listed the three files it expected and
checked they were in the backup set, so it could never have noticed a
FOURTH file being added. Here the set of files generate_config() writes
is observed (and, for env-gated branches this fixture cannot safely
execute, read out of the source), and anything not backed up has to be
on the documented exclusion list below.
"""
# Written by generate_config() but deliberately NOT restorable, with
# the reason. Everything else must be in the backup set: `haproxy -c`
# validates the config as a set, so a file it loads that is not
# restored alongside haproxy.cfg breaks rollback.
excluded = {
# Only ever created empty-when-missing (haproxy refuses to start
# with an ACL -f pointing at a missing file); its contents are
# owned by the /suspended API, not by generate_config(), so there
# is nothing here for a config rollback to undo.
'suspended_domains.list',
# Generated once and then read, never rewritten with new content.
# Its value is rendered INTO haproxy.cfg, so restoring an older
# haproxy.cfg alongside the current secret file is consistent.
'cluster-secret',
}
backed_up = {os.path.basename(p) for p, _ in hm._config_backup_pairs()}
# 1. Observed: run a generation with every patchable optional branch on
# and see what actually changed on disk.
self.add_domain('derive.example.com', 'derive_backend')
os.environ['HAPROXY_CORAZA_SPOE_BACKEND'] = '127.0.0.1:9000'
self.addCleanup(os.environ.pop, 'HAPROXY_CORAZA_SPOE_BACKEND', None)
before = self._snapshot_etc()
hm.generate_config()
after = self._snapshot_etc()
touched = {name for name, blob in after.items()
if before.get(name) != blob}
self.assertIn('coraza-spoe.cfg', touched,
'fixture precondition: the Coraza branch did not run')
# 2. Read out of the source: branches this fixture must not execute
# (suspension writes a hardcoded /etc/haproxy path that no test
# global can redirect) still have to be accounted for.
touched |= {
os.path.basename(m)
for m in re.findall(r"'(/etc/haproxy/[\w.+-]+)'",
inspect.getsource(hm.generate_config))
}
unaccounted = touched - backed_up - excluded
self.assertEqual(
unaccounted, set(),
f'generate_config() writes {sorted(unaccounted)}, which is neither '
'in the backup set nor on the documented exclusion list - a '
'rollback would restore a mixed-vintage config set')
def _snapshot_etc(self):
"""Contents of every plain file in the fake /etc/haproxy.
Skips the backup halves (they are the thing being maintained), the
SQLite database and its journals, and the stats socket.
"""
skip_prefixes = (os.path.basename(hm.DB_FILE),
os.path.basename(hm.HAPROXY_SOCKET_PATH))
state = {}
for name in os.listdir(self.etc):
path = os.path.join(self.etc, name)
if not os.path.isfile(path) or name.endswith('.backup'):
continue
if name.startswith(skip_prefixes):
continue
with open(path, 'rb') as fh:
state[name] = fh.read()
return state
def test_coraza_spoe_config_round_trips(self):
self.generate_good_config()
@@ -452,8 +521,12 @@ class TestAtomicWrite(RollbackTestCase):
fh.write('old content\n')
# Anything that makes f.write() blow up mid-flight stands in for a full
# disk / killed container.
with self.assertRaises(Exception):
# disk / killed container. TypeError specifically, not Exception: a
# bare assertRaises(Exception) also swallows the AttributeError raised
# when write_config_atomically does not exist at all, so this test
# passed against the pre-fix tree and would keep passing if the
# function were deleted.
with self.assertRaises(TypeError):
hm.write_config_atomically(path, object())
self.assertEqual(self.read(path), 'old content\n',
@@ -462,6 +535,241 @@ class TestAtomicWrite(RollbackTestCase):
self.assertEqual(leftovers, [], f'temp files left behind: {leftovers}')
class TestBackupFailureGuard(RollbackTestCase):
"""generate_config() refuses to write when no rollback target could be taken."""
def test_a_failed_backup_stops_the_config_from_being_written(self):
good = self.generate_good_config()
self.block_ip('192.0.2.10')
hm.update_blocked_ips_map()
good_map = self.read(hm.BLOCKED_IPS_MAP_PATH)
real_create_backup = hm.create_backup
hm.create_backup = lambda *a, **kw: (False, 'error')
self.addCleanup(setattr, hm, 'create_backup', real_create_backup)
self.add_domain('second.example.com', 'second_backend', '10.0.0.3')
with self.assertRaises(Exception) as ctx:
hm.generate_config()
self.assertIn('Refusing to regenerate', str(ctx.exception),
'a backup failure was not reported as a refusal')
self.assertEqual(
self.read(hm.HAPROXY_CONFIG_PATH), good,
'a new config was written even though the snapshot failed - a bad '
'change could not have been rolled back')
self.assertEqual(
self.read(hm.BLOCKED_IPS_MAP_PATH), good_map,
'the blocked IPs map was rewritten even though the snapshot failed')
class TestValidatorAvailability(RollbackTestCase):
"""'the validator could not run' is not the same as 'the config is bad'."""
def _hide_the_haproxy_binary(self):
empty = os.path.join(self.tmp, 'empty-bin')
os.makedirs(empty, exist_ok=True)
os.environ['PATH'] = empty
# setUp's cleanup restores the original PATH.
def test_a_missing_validator_is_unavailable_not_invalid(self):
good = self.generate_good_config()
self._hide_the_haproxy_binary()
status, message = hm.validate_config_file(hm.HAPROXY_CONFIG_PATH)
self.assertEqual(status, 'unavailable',
'a validator that could not run was reported as a '
f'verdict on the config ({status}: {message})')
# And the consequence create_backup() draws from it: a config it could
# not check is still snapshotted, because refusing would leave the box
# with no rollback target at all. Contrast
# test_a_broken_current_config_does_not_replace_a_good_backup, where a
# real 'invalid' verdict yields 'kept_previous'.
with open(hm.HAPROXY_CONFIG_PATH, 'w') as fh:
fh.write('hand written, unverifiable\n')
ok, status = hm.create_backup()
self.assertTrue(ok)
self.assertEqual(status, 'created',
'an unverifiable config was treated as a rejected one')
self.assertEqual(self.read(hm.HAPROXY_BACKUP_PATH),
'hand written, unverifiable\n')
self.assertNotEqual(self.read(hm.HAPROXY_BACKUP_PATH), good)
class TestFileComparison(RollbackTestCase):
"""The fast path compares bytes, not sizes."""
def test_same_size_different_content_is_not_identical(self):
a = os.path.join(self.etc, 'a')
b = os.path.join(self.etc, 'b')
with open(a, 'w') as fh:
fh.write('aaaa\n')
with open(b, 'w') as fh:
fh.write('aaba\n')
self.assertEqual(os.path.getsize(a), os.path.getsize(b),
'fixture: the two files must be the same size')
self.assertFalse(hm._files_identical(a, b),
'two same-size files with different bytes compared equal')
def test_a_same_size_drifted_config_still_hits_the_validation_gate(self):
"""The case the byte-compare exists for.
A config edited in place without changing its length (one character
swapped, a hostname replaced by another of the same width) must not be
mistaken for the known-good backup and waved through.
"""
good = self.generate_good_config()
# Sized in BYTES, not characters: the rendered config contains
# non-ASCII (em dashes in template comments), so len(str) would be
# smaller than the file and this test would pass for the wrong reason.
size = os.path.getsize(hm.HAPROXY_CONFIG_PATH)
broken = f'# {BROKEN_TOKEN}\n'.encode()
broken += b'#' * (size - len(broken) - 1) + b'\n'
with open(hm.HAPROXY_CONFIG_PATH, 'wb') as fh:
fh.write(broken)
self.assertEqual(os.path.getsize(hm.HAPROXY_CONFIG_PATH), size,
'fixture: the drifted config must be the same size')
ok, status = hm.create_backup()
self.assertTrue(ok)
self.assertEqual(
status, 'kept_previous',
'a same-size broken config was accepted as unchanged and skipped '
'the validation gate')
self.assertEqual(self.read(hm.HAPROXY_BACKUP_PATH), good,
'the known-good backup was overwritten')
class TestBlockedIpsMapWrites(RollbackTestCase):
"""blocked_ips.map is loaded by `haproxy -c`, so it gets the same care.
Verified against HAProxy 2.8: with the map referenced by
map_ip(/etc/haproxy/blocked_ips.map,0), a half-written final line makes the
WHOLE configuration invalid ("'198.51.10' is not a valid IPv4 or IPv6
address at line 2 of file ..."), not merely a dropped entry.
"""
def test_the_map_goes_through_the_atomic_writer(self):
seen = []
real_write = hm.write_config_atomically
def spy(path, content, *args, **kwargs):
seen.append(path)
return real_write(path, content, *args, **kwargs)
hm.write_config_atomically = spy
self.addCleanup(setattr, hm, 'write_config_atomically', real_write)
self.block_ip('192.0.2.10')
self.assertTrue(hm.update_blocked_ips_map())
self.assertIn(hm.BLOCKED_IPS_MAP_PATH, seen,
'the blocked IPs map was written without the atomic '
'writer - a truncated map is a fatal config')
def test_a_crash_before_the_rename_leaves_the_old_map_intact(self):
self.block_ip('192.0.2.10')
hm.update_blocked_ips_map()
good_map = self.read(hm.BLOCKED_IPS_MAP_PATH)
real_replace = os.replace
def boom(src, dst, *args, **kwargs):
if dst == hm.BLOCKED_IPS_MAP_PATH:
raise OSError('simulated crash between write and rename')
return real_replace(src, dst, *args, **kwargs)
os.replace = boom
self.addCleanup(setattr, os, 'replace', real_replace)
self.block_ip('198.51.100.20')
self.assertFalse(hm.update_blocked_ips_map(),
'a failed map write was reported as success')
os.replace = real_replace
self.assertEqual(
self.read(hm.BLOCKED_IPS_MAP_PATH), good_map,
'an interrupted map write clobbered the map HAProxy is running')
leftovers = [n for n in os.listdir(self.etc) if n.endswith('.tmp')]
self.assertEqual(leftovers, [], f'temp files left behind: {leftovers}')
def test_a_malformed_map_is_not_recorded_as_known_good(self):
"""The map backup must stay something HAProxy would actually load."""
self.generate_good_config()
good_map = self.read(hm.BLOCKED_IPS_MAP_BACKUP_PATH)
# Straight into the table, the way a bad row gets there in the first
# place - the API route is not the only writer.
self.block_ip('not-an-ip')
hm.update_blocked_ips_map()
self.assertEqual(
self.read(hm.BLOCKED_IPS_MAP_BACKUP_PATH), good_map,
'a map HAProxy cannot parse was promoted to the rollback target')
def test_no_map_backup_is_fabricated_before_a_config_exists(self):
"""Nothing to stay in step with means nothing to write."""
self.block_ip('192.0.2.10')
self.assertTrue(hm.update_blocked_ips_map())
self.assertFalse(
os.path.exists(hm.BLOCKED_IPS_MAP_BACKUP_PATH),
'a rollback target was invented out of a map write alone')
class TestValidationCost(RollbackTestCase):
"""`haproxy -c` runs are the customer-facing cost of a config change.
generate_config() runs synchronously inside the API call that adds a
domain, and on an edge with hundreds of certificates `haproxy -c` is the
expensive part. These counts are the contract; changing them should be a
deliberate decision, not a side effect.
"""
def _count_validations(self, action):
calls = []
real_validate = hm.validate_config_file
def spy(path):
calls.append(path)
return real_validate(path)
hm.validate_config_file = spy
try:
action()
finally:
hm.validate_config_file = real_validate
return len(calls)
def test_blocking_an_ip_does_not_add_a_validation_to_the_next_change(self):
self.generate_good_config()
def add(domain, backend, address):
self.add_domain(domain, backend, address)
hm.generate_config()
steady = self._count_validations(
lambda: add('a.example.com', 'a_backend', '10.0.0.4'))
self.assertEqual(
steady, 1,
'a steady-state config change should cost exactly one `haproxy -c` '
'(the pre-reload gate); the known-good fast path should skip the '
f'other one, but {steady} ran')
# What POST /api/blocked-ips does: rewrite the map outside
# generate_config(). This fleet blocks IPs automatically, so it happens
# between most config changes.
self.block_ip('192.0.2.10')
hm.update_blocked_ips_map()
after_block = self._count_validations(
lambda: add('b.example.com', 'b_backend', '10.0.0.5'))
self.assertEqual(
after_block, steady,
'an IP block left the map out of step with its backup, so the next '
f'domain add paid {after_block} `haproxy -c` runs instead of '
f'{steady} - on the customer-facing call')
if __name__ == '__main__':
print(f"testing haproxy_manager from: {MODULE_DIR}")
unittest.main(verbosity=2)